Here's how NCBI.NLM.NIH.GOV makes money* and how much!

*Please read our disclaimer before using our estimates.
Loading...

NCBI . NLM . NIH . GOV {}

  1. Analyzed Page
  2. Matching Content Categories
  3. CMS
  4. Monthly Traffic Estimate
  5. How Does Ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Make Money
  6. Keywords
  7. Topics
  8. Questions
  9. Social Networks
  10. External Links
  11. Analytics And Tracking
  12. Libraries
  13. Hosting Providers
  14. CDN Services

We began analyzing https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7610724/, but it redirected us to https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7610724/. The analysis below is for the second page.

Title[redir]:
A manifesto for reproducible science - PMC
Description:
Improving the reliability and efficiency of scientific research will increase the credibility of the published scientific literature and accelerate discovery. Here we argue for the adoption of measures to optimize key elements of the scientific ...

Matching Content Categories {📚}

  • Education
  • Science
  • Careers

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is ncbi.nlm.nih.gov built with?

Custom-built

No common CMS systems were detected on Ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, and no known web development framework was identified.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of ncbi.nlm.nih.gov audience?

🌠 Phenomenal Traffic: 5M - 10M visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 5,000,005 visitors per month in the current month.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Make Money? {💸}

We can't see how the site brings in money.

Not all websites are made for profit; some exist to inform or educate users. Or any other reason why people make websites. And this might be the case. Ncbi.nlm.nih.gov has a revenue plan, but it's either invisible or we haven't found it.

Keywords {🔍}

doi, research, pubmed, google, scholar, data, science, reporting, results, open, pmc, study, article, free, analysis, guidelines, scientific, review, studies, design, practices, published, journals, psychol, researchers, incentives, statistical, transparency, outcomes, evaluation, evidence, preregistration, peer, measures, methods, reproducibility, power, trials, journal, sciences, process, social, publication, plos, quality, authors, bias, systematic, box, public,

Topics {✒️}

gov/grants/nih-public-access-plan org/independent-statistical-standing-committee/ trialling ‘results-free’ review multi-site collaborative projects low-powered research persists pmc beta search heterogeneous meta-analysis compared de/open-science-hiring-practices/ post-publication peer review inflated false-positive rates decisions remain data-independent chdi management/chdi foundation grant number bb/n019660/1 data-contingent exploratory research high-impact-factor journals abnormal-social psychological research null-hypothesis significance testing32 org/apps/p-hacker/ data-independent confirmatory research medical research council acknowledge open-science practices promoting study pre-registration pre-publication independent replications high-dimensional dataset publisher site pdf competing interests results-blind publishing model piloting funding mechanisms post-publication review de groot ad magnetic resonance imaging conduct pre-registered research altering incentive structures pre-clinical animal studies post hoc origin7 diversifying peer review high-dimensional data preregistration challenge workflow web-based modules large-scale replication efforts statistically significant finding alter reward structures full disclosure refers post-publication services report pre-registered outcomes [google scholar] 22 [google scholar] 23 [google scholar] 48 [google scholar] 79 open peer review

Questions {❓}

  • Content area experts as authors: helpful or harmful for systematic reviews and meta-analyses?
  • Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies?
  • Replications in psychology research: how often do they really occur?
  • Sifting the evidence—what's wrong with significance tests?
  • What proportion of published research is likely to be false?

Social Networks {👍}(6)

External Links {🔗}(185)

Analytics and Tracking {📊}

  • Google Analytics
  • Google Analytics 4
  • Google Tag Manager

Libraries {📚}

  • Foundation
  • jQuery
  • jQuery module (jquery-3.6.0)

Emails and Hosting {✉️}

Mail Servers:

  • nihcesxway.hub.nih.gov
  • nihcesxway2.hub.nih.gov
  • nihcesxway3.hub.nih.gov
  • nihcesxway4.hub.nih.gov
  • nihcesxway5.hub.nih.gov

Name Servers:

  • dns1-ncbi.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  • dns2-ncbi.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  • lhcns1.nlm.nih.gov
  • lhcns2.nlm.nih.gov

CDN Services {📦}

  • Ncbi

3.83s.