Here's how DATATRACKER.IETF.ORG makes money* and how much!

*Please read our disclaimer before using our estimates.
Loading...

DATATRACKER . IETF . ORG {}

  1. Analyzed Page
  2. Matching Content Categories
  3. CMS
  4. Monthly Traffic Estimate
  5. How Does Datatracker.ietf.org Make Money
  6. Keywords
  7. Topics
  8. Questions
  9. External Links
  10. Analytics And Tracking
  11. Libraries

We are analyzing https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5785.

Title:
RFC 5785 - Defining Well-Known Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)
Description:
This memo defines a path prefix for "well-known locations", "/.well-known/", in selected Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) schemes. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Website Age:
30 years and 3 months (reg. 1995-03-11).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

  • Technology & Computing
  • Telecommunications
  • Video & Online Content

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is datatracker.ietf.org built with?

Custom-built

No common CMS systems were detected on Datatracker.ietf.org, and no known web development framework was identified.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of datatracker.ietf.org audience?

🌟 Strong Traffic: 100k - 200k visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 100,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Datatracker.ietf.org Make Money? {💸}

We can't tell how the site generates income.

Many websites are intended to earn money, but some serve to share ideas or build connections. Websites exist for all kinds of purposes. This might be one of them. Datatracker.ietf.org has a secret sauce for making money, but we can't detect it yet.

Keywords {🔍}

wellknown, rfc, uri, uris, document, draftnottinghamsitemeta, nottingham, hammerlahav, standards, april, track, information, page, defining, ietf, resource, registration, references, metadata, web, specification, http, internet, request, memo, defines, path, locations, considerations, policy, review, section, authors, documents, iana, appendix, designated, applications, world, wide, email, engineering, uniform, publication, errata, provide, obtained, bcp, registry, sitewide,

Topics {✒️}

draft-nottingham-site-meta site-wide metadata site nottingham request hammer-lahav updates standards track issn rfc 2119 [rfc2119] standards-track rfcs rfc-editor org/license-info org/info/rfc5785 datatracker bug rfc 5741 rfc 2119 rfc 3986 rfc 5226 rfc 2616 rfc 4918 home page uri errata simplified bsd license media type media-type internet standards web-based protocols code components extracted frequently asked questions segment-nz production normal load issues breno de medeiros org mailing list protocol-specific details path component begins rec-webarch-20041215] trust legal provisions document authors pre-existing resources received public review client-perceived latency general information retrieval dns rebinding attacks e-mail address uniform resource identifiers additional path components privacy preferences [w3c pre-existing uris pre-existing uri uri path segment discover privacy policy [rfc3986] berners-lee

Questions {❓}

  • Aren't well-known locations bad for the Web?
  • Why aren't per-directory well-known locations defined?
  • Well-known?

Analytics and Tracking {📊}

  • Piwik/Matomo

Libraries {📚}

  • Bootstrap
  • Hammer.js
  • Select2
  • Vue.js

2.02s.