Here's how RFC-EDITOR.ORG makes money* and how much!

*Please read our disclaimer before using our estimates.
Loading...

RFC-EDITOR . ORG {}

  1. Analyzed Page
  2. Matching Content Categories
  3. CMS
  4. Monthly Traffic Estimate
  5. How Does Rfc-editor.org Make Money
  6. Keywords
  7. Topics
  8. Questions
  9. External Links
  10. Libraries
  11. Hosting Providers

We are analyzing https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5785.html.

Title:
RFC 5785: Defining Well-Known Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)
Description:
No description found...
Website Age:
27 years and 1 months (reg. 1998-05-15).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

  • Technology & Computing
  • Video & Online Content
  • Telecommunications

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is rfc-editor.org built with?

Custom-built

No common CMS systems were detected on Rfc-editor.org, and no known web development framework was identified.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of rfc-editor.org audience?

🌟 Strong Traffic: 100k - 200k visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 100,772 visitors per month in the current month.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Rfc-editor.org Make Money? {💸}

We can't tell how the site generates income.

Earning money isn't the goal of every website; some are designed to offer support or promote social causes. People have different reasons for creating websites. This might be one such reason. Rfc-editor.org could be secretly minting cash, but we can't detect the process.

Keywords {🔍}

wellknown, rfc, uri, uris, document, standards, page, nottingham, hammerlahav, track, april, information, defining, ietf, resource, registration, references, metadata, web, specification, http, internet, request, memo, defines, path, locations, considerations, policy, review, section, documents, iana, appendix, designated, applications, world, wide, errata, engineering, uniform, publication, provide, obtained, bcp, registry, sitewide, access, privacy, location,

Topics {✒️}

hammer-lahav updates standards track issn standards-track rfcs home page uri simplified bsd license [rfc home] [text org/license-info internet standards org/info/rfc5785 web-based protocols nottingham request site-wide metadata code components extracted frequently asked questions segment-nz production normal load issues breno de medeiros org mailing list protocol-specific details path component begins rec-webarch-20041215] trust legal provisions pre-existing resources received public review client-perceived latency general information retrieval dns rebinding attacks e-mail address uniform resource identifiers additional path components privacy preferences [w3c pre-existing uris pre-existing uri uri path segment rfc 2119 [rfc2119] discover privacy policy [rfc3986] berners-lee sites' uri space rfc-editor document authors iana considerations section errata normative references informative references privacy preferences 1 registration template berners-lee review list path prefix discovering policy

Questions {❓}

  • Aren't well-known locations bad for the Web?
  • Why aren't per-directory well-known locations defined?
  • Well-known?

Libraries {📚}

  • Hammer.js

Emails and Hosting {✉️}

Mail Servers:

  • mail2.ietf.org

Name Servers:

  • jill.ns.cloudflare.com
  • ken.ns.cloudflare.com
1.88s.