Here's how W3.ORG makes money* and how much!

*Please read our disclaimer before using our estimates.
Loading...

W3 . ORG {}

  1. Analyzed Page
  2. Matching Content Categories
  3. CMS
  4. Monthly Traffic Estimate
  5. How Does W3.org Make Money
  6. Keywords
  7. Topics
  8. Questions
  9. External Links
  10. Hosting Providers

We are analyzing https://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/.

Title:
Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Third Edition)
Description:
No description found...
Website Age:
31 years and 0 months (reg. 1994-07-06).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

  • History
  • Education
  • Careers

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is w3.org built with?

Custom-built

No common CMS systems were detected on W3.org, and no known web development framework was identified.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of w3.org audience?

🌍 Impressive Traffic: 500k - 1M visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 639,579 visitors per month in the current month.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does W3.org Make Money? {💸}

We're unsure how the site profits.

While profit motivates many websites, others exist to inspire, entertain, or provide valuable resources. Websites have a variety of goals. And this might be one of them. W3.org could be getting rich in stealth mode, or the way it's monetizing isn't detectable.

Keywords {🔍}

namespace, names, xml, attribute, document, element, namespaces, attributes, prefix, uri, default, specification, references, declaration, qualified, definition, declared, documents, scope, version, declarations, nonnormative, qname, markup, elements, prefixes, ncname, edition, errata, rfc, local, bound, case, note, nsc, unprefixed, production, reserved, part, constraint, xmlns, html, software, reference, uris, productions, defined, expanded, match, conforming,

Topics {✒️}

org/tr/2009/rec-xml-names-20091208/ latest version org/tr/xml-names/ previous versions org/tr/2006/rec-xml-names-20060816/ http org/tr/rec-xml/ org/xml/2009/xml-names-errata org/xml/xml-names-19990114-errata org/xml/2006/xml-names-errata excessive variance pub extensible markup language bad empty-element tags relative uri references special interest group uniform resource identifier attribute-based declaration syntax uri references [rfc3986] processing instruction targets produce greater consistency work reflects input org/rfc/rfc2141 namespace declaration declaring current w3c publications w3c metadata activity org/rfc/rfc2119 org/rfc/rfc3629 multiple markup vocabularies uri reference [rfc3986] org/rfc/rfc3986 w3c xml activity xml-names-20090806/ editors html highlighting differences satisfy cross-references include normative corrections prefixed markup occurs validating xml processor validating xml processor technology=xml-names namespace uri reference multiple software modules legal uri reference org/xml/1998/namespace nsattname eq attvalue w3c patent policy org/2003/03/translations/bytechnology org/~wilbur http xml documents conforming org/tr/2009/ org/tr/ default namespace declaration qname eq attvalue require validating processors

Questions {❓}

  • [12]    STag    ::=    '<' QName (S Attribute)* S?
  • [13]    ETag    ::=    '
  • [14]    EmptyElemTag    ::=    '<' QName (S Attribute)* S?
  • [18]    cp    ::=    (QName | choice | seq) ('?
  • [19]    Mixed    ::=    '(' S?
  • Org/2003/03/Translations/byTechnology?
  • | '(' S?

Emails and Hosting {✉️}

Mail Servers:

  • pan.w3.org
  • puck.w3.org

Name Servers:

  • jamie.ns.cloudflare.com
  • pranab.ns.cloudflare.com
2.66s.