Here's how RFC-EDITOR.ORG makes money* and how much!

*Please read our disclaimer before using our estimates.
Loading...

RFC-EDITOR . ORG {}

  1. Analyzed Page
  2. Matching Content Categories
  3. CMS
  4. Monthly Traffic Estimate
  5. How Does Rfc-editor.org Make Money
  6. Keywords
  7. Topics
  8. Questions
  9. External Links
  10. Hosting Providers

We are analyzing https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8941.html.

Title:
RFC 8941: Structured Field Values for HTTP
Description:
This document describes a set of data types and associated algorithms that are intended to make it easier and safer to define and handle HTTP header and trailer fields, known as "Structured Fields", "Structured Headers", or "Structured Trailers". It is intended for use by specifications of new HTTP fields that wish to use a common syntax that is more restrictive than traditional HTTP field values.
Website Age:
27 years and 1 months (reg. 1998-05-15).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

  • Books & Literature
  • Sports
  • TV

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is rfc-editor.org built with?

Custom-built

No common CMS systems were detected on Rfc-editor.org, and no known web development framework was identified.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of rfc-editor.org audience?

🌟 Strong Traffic: 100k - 200k visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 100,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Rfc-editor.org Make Money? {💸}

We can't see how the site brings in money.

Some websites aren't about earning revenue; they're built to connect communities or raise awareness. There are numerous motivations behind creating websites. This might be one of them. Rfc-editor.org has a revenue plan, but it's either invisible or we haven't found it.

Keywords {🔍}

inputstring, section, field, parsing, return, rfc, output, parameters, string, fail, character, result, append, http, serializing, fields, empty, structured, item, running, list, ascii, header, dictionary, members, characters, values, integer, defined, serialization, types, boolean, lists, note, decimal, key, byte, strings, sequence, implementations, abnf, specification, data, char, document, items, membervalue, outputstring, parsers, parsed,

Topics {✒️}

sf-binary = augmented backus-naur form net/ poul-henning kamp 1sp sf-item violating field-specific constraints simplified bsd license top-level data structure = sf-item / sf-string sf-token = range %x20 sf-boolean = escaped = sf-integer sf-integer = [ hypertext transfer protocol single bare item standards track published i-json message format org/license-info legal provisions relating frequently asked questions resulting memory commitment anne van kesteren top-level types top-level serialize common test suite trust legal provisions expected wire representations floating-point arithmetic sf intentionally strict processing ascii encoding [rfc0020] org/info/rfc8941 code components extracted range %x00-1f case-insensitively match widely shared feelings base64-decoding [rfc4648] b64_content short textual words escape double quotes ascii string suitable multiple header instances illustrate expected syntax extremely large fields add additional constraints alternative rounding strategy preferably utf-8 [std63] specification specifically disallows existing http fields

Questions {❓}

  • A Boolean is indicated with a leading "?
  • Append "?
  • Example-Boolean: ?
  • Example-Dict: a=?
  • Why Not JSON?
  • Sf-boolean = "?
  •   Why Not JSON?

Emails and Hosting {✉️}

Mail Servers:

  • mail2.ietf.org

Name Servers:

  • jill.ns.cloudflare.com
  • ken.ns.cloudflare.com
2.54s.