PYTHON-NOTES . CURIOUSEFFICIENCY . ORG {}

Detected CMS Systems:

Blogger (2 occurrences)

Analyzed Page
Matching Content Categories
CMS
Monthly Traffic Estimate
How Does Python-notes.curiousefficiency.org Make Money
Keywords
Topics
Questions
Social Networks
External Links

We are analyzing https://python-notes.curiousefficiency.org/en/latest/python3/questions_and_answers.html.

Title:
Python 3 Q & A - Alyssa Coghlan's Python Notes
Description:
No description found...
Website Age:
13 years and 11 months (reg. 2011-07-22).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

Technology & Computing
Telecommunications
Education

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is python-notes.curiousefficiency.org built with?

Python-notes.curiousefficiency.org operates using BLOGGER.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of python-notes.curiousefficiency.org audience?

🚦 Initial Traffic: less than 1k visitors per month

Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 19 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Python-notes.curiousefficiency.org Make Money? {💸}

We don’t know how the website earns money.

Not all websites are made for profit; some exist to inform or educate users. Or any other reason why people make websites. And this might be the case. Python-notes.curiousefficiency.org could be getting rich in stealth mode, or the way it's monetizing isn't detectable.

Keywords {🔍}

python, support, unicode, text, code, release, data, system, users, pep, type, default, binary, core, development, language, migration, model, encoding, linux, developers, module, time, ascii, make, compatible, library, applications, version, made, red, change, cpython, years, posix, project, string, point, platform, handling, file, line, published, based, web, print, standard, systems, isnt, utf,

Topics {✒️}

cx-freeze binary creators org/en/latest/releasenotes/v2 compiler-assisted string interpolation cross-platform command clients pre-release design period cpython toggle navigation f-string formatting syntax python-modernize variant performs a-service offering bytecode-focused implementations targeting cross-version compatible access pylint --py3k utility printf-style interpolation native asyncio-based alternatives pylint --py3k option ed schofield based offering commercial support continuum analytics provide python-ideas mailing lists huawei enterprise cloud enterprise linux vendors bytes-centric posix applications multicore processing support $ touch dir1/nspkg/__init__ pylint --py3k flag red hat specialises jit compilation support constrained plugin ecosystems code freeze date early adopter crowd flexible python-specific str contents sidebar skip encode character u'\xe9' enterprise linux distributions binary interpolation support implicit jit support single source support rhel/centos user base single biggest gain linux distribution vendors samba protocol server permits silent promotion unicode literal support software collections model general guiding philosophy software collections runtimes ascii compatible segments �ascii compatible segments wire protocol development receive significant support

Questions {❓}

7 coming out?
8 release help ease the transition?
April 2006: Guido published PEP 3000, laying the ground rules for Python 3 development, and detailing the proposed migration strategy for Python 2 projects (the recommended porting approach has changed substantially since then, see What other changes have occurred that simplify migration?
Aren’t you abandoning Python 2 users?
Aren’t you concerned Python 2 users will abandon Python over this?
But uptake is so slow, doesn’t this mean Python 3 is failing as a platform?
Didn’t you strand the major alternative implementations on Python 2?
Doesn’t this make Python look like an immature and unstable platform?
Editor/IDE support for Python 3 in: PyDev, Spyder, Python Tools for Visual Studio, PyCharm, WingIDE, Komodo (others?
Embedded Python 3 support in: Blender, Kate, vim, gdb, gcc, LibreOffice (others?
For the inverse question relating to the concern that the existing migration plan is too aggressive, see Aren’t you abandoning Python 2 users?
For the inverse question relating to the concern that the existing migration plan is too conservative, see But uptake is so slow, doesn’t this mean Python 3 is failing as a platform?
For these users, the question isn’t necessarily “Why would I start using Python 3?
Is Python 3 a better language to teach beginning programmers?
Is Python 3 more convenient than Python 2 in every respect?
Is the ultimate success of Python 3 as a platform assured?
OK, that explains Unicode, but what about all the other incompatible changes?
Out of the box, why is Python 3 better than Python 2?
Python 3 is meant to fix Unicode, so why is still broken?
Python 3 is meant to make Unicode easier, so why is harder?
Should I learn Python 2 or Python 3?
Should I migrate it to Python 3?
Should I teach Python 2 or Python 3?
Should I use Python 2 or Python 3?
The Python 3 model also required more complex impedance matching on POSIX platforms, which is covered by a separate question: What’s up with POSIX systems in Python 3?
The are also more specific questions covering the state of the WSGI middleware interface for web services, and the issues that can arise when dealing with What’s up with POSIX systems in Python 3?
This means that while conservative users that are already using Python are likely to stick with Python 2 for the time being (“if it isn’t broken for us, why change it?
Well, why not just add JIT compilation, then?
What about ?
What actually changed in the text model between Python 2 and Python 3?
What are (or were) some of the key dates in the Python 3 transition?
What changes in Python 3 have been made specifically to simplify migration?
What future changes in Python 3 are expected to further simplify migration?
What other changes have occurred that simplify migration?
What other notable changes in Python 3 depend on the text model change?
What would it take to make you change your minds about the current plan?
What’s up with POSIX systems in Python 3?
What’s up with WSGI in Python 3?
When can we expect Python 2 to be a purely historical relic?
When did Python 3 become the obvious choice for new projects?
Where’s the disconnect?
While part of the problem was simply the sheer amount of code to be reviewed and potentially updated, the core of the delay was the issues discussed in the answer to What’s up with POSIX systems in Python 3?
Why did Apple decide not to ship Python 3?
Why have Linux distributions taken so long to migrate away from Python 2?
Why not just assume UTF-8 and avoid having to decode at system boundaries?
Why was Python 3 made incompatible with Python 2?
Why wasn’t I consulted?

Social Networks {👍}(3)

External Links {🔗}(160)

4.56s.