LISTS . W3 . ORG {
}
Title:
Re: [css-counter-styles] Any chance of requiring a -- prefix on the names? from fantasai on 2016-02-24 ([email protected] from February 2016)
Description:
No description found...
Website Age:
31 years and 0 months (reg. 1994-07-06).
Matching Content Categories {📚}
- Social Networks
- Telecommunications
- Dating & Relationships
Content Management System {📝}
What CMS is lists.w3.org built with?
Website use hypermail 3.0.0, see https://github.com/hypermail-project/hypermail/.
Traffic Estimate {📈}
What is the average monthly size of lists.w3.org audience?
🚄 Respectable Traffic: 10k - 20k visitors per month
Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.
check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush
How Does Lists.w3.org Make Money? {💸}
We see no obvious way the site makes money.
Not all websites focus on profit; some are designed to educate, connect people, or share useful tools. People create websites for numerous reasons. And this could be one such example. Lists.w3.org might be making money, but it's not detectable how they're doing it.
Keywords {🔍}
names, message, csscounterstyles, chance, requiring, prefix, thread, tab, atkins, syntax, counterstyle, reply, françois, remy, wwwstyleworg, february, body, respond, messages, previous, fantasai, date, list, namespace, keywords, spec, customident, firefox, change, utc, mail, archives, home, mailing, lists, public, options, related, replies, fantasailistsinkedbladenet, tue, feb, jackalmagegmailcom, wwwstyle, messageid, cdbainkedbladenet, wrote, noted, recent, allowed,
Topics {✒️}
options related messages tab atkins jr [css-counter-styles] normal keywords meant message previous message message body respond [css-variables] message body previous message counter names message mail org february 2016 mistake - allowing funky things easily distinguishable v33 afaict legacy reasons wider syntax possibly indefinitely françois remy mail actions existing names animation names thread replies recent thread list spec today namespace prefixes archives search firefox message syntax respond names spec thread date archives chance requiring prefix reply tue 42 pm wrote noted allowed fill updated written
Questions {❓}
- > feasible?
- > the wider syntax for some period of time (possibly indefinitely)?
- Does anyone (Xidorn?
- Next in thread: François REMY: "RE: [css-counter-styles] Any chance of requiring a -- prefix on the names?
- Next message: François REMY: "RE: [css-counter-styles] Any chance of requiring a -- prefix on the names?
- Re: [css-counter-styles] Any chance of requiring a -- prefix on the names?
- Re: [css-variables] Why so inefficient?
- Reply: François REMY: "RE: [css-counter-styles] Any chance of requiring a -- prefix on the names?
- [css-counter-styles] Any chance of requiring a -- prefix on the names?