Here's how LISTS.W3.ORG makes money* and how much!

*Please read our disclaimer before using our estimates.
Loading...

LISTS . W3 . ORG {}

  1. Analyzed Page
  2. Matching Content Categories
  3. CMS
  4. Monthly Traffic Estimate
  5. How Does Lists.w3.org Make Money
  6. Keywords
  7. Topics
  8. Questions
  9. External Links

We are analyzing https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0111.html.

Title:
[CSSWG] Minutes Paris F2F 2015-08-27 Part III: Selectors [selectors4] from Dael Jackson on 2015-09-14 ([email protected] from September 2015)
Description:
No description found...
Website Age:
30 years and 11 months (reg. 1994-07-06).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

  • Dating & Relationships
  • Graphic Design
  • Technology & Computing

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is lists.w3.org built with?

Website use hypermail 3.0.0, see https://github.com/hypermail-project/hypermail/.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of lists.w3.org audience?

🚄 Respectable Traffic: 10k - 20k visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,334 visitors per month in the current month.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Lists.w3.org Make Money? {💸}

We can't tell how the site generates income.

Not every website is profit-driven; some are created to spread information or serve as an online presence. Websites can be made for many reasons. This could be one of them. Lists.w3.org might have a hidden revenue stream, but it's not something we can detect.

Keywords {🔍}

fantasai, tabatkins, tantek, dbaron, dont, florian, resolved, selector, selectors, pseudoelements, things, match, people, valid, drop, empty, column, spec, plinss, case, invalid, pseudoclass, add, pseudoclasses, change, element, atrisk, level, syntax, combinators, doesnt, content, user, matches, make, theyre, leaverou, authors, section, elements, accept, hover, combinator, userinvalid, select, work, issue, pseudo, uservalid, single,

Topics {✒️}

org/tr/html5/disabled-elements org/tr/2012/wd-selectors4-20120823/ individually enable pseudo-classes moz-number-spin-box single-colon pseudo-element syntax user-action pseudo-classes pseudo-classing pseudo-elements moz-ui-valid - polyfilled moz-submit-invalid appears public real world org/mid/55aeabe6 user-error pseudo-class moz-range-progress moz-progress-bar moz-number-spin moz-range-thumb moz-color-swatch css resembles perl moz-meter-bar requires applying styles moz-number-wrapper text/css files /docs/web/css/ moz-number-text syntactic pseudo-classes options related messages resolution pending agreement pseudo-class combinations pseudo-class combos putting pseudo-class selectors module provided org message-id moz-range-track selectors specifically interact split pseudo-elements click handler pops click event handling internal structure easily consistent forward writing-mode values moz-ui-invalid define css differently 3 people cc'ed scoping module inside pseudo-elements moz-ui-valid moz-submit-invalid open naming discussions selectors [selectors4] change] [css-snappoints]

Questions {❓}

  • what about ::attr():hover?
  • you're using generated content to create UI?
  • Are we confident we're not going to change this?
  • Are you okay with this dbaron?
  • ChrisL: And how does rewriting it affect the HTML WG?
  • ChrisL: How does this work with spanning?
  • ChrisL: Why is it different?
  • Does that sound good?
  • Florian: Can we?
  • Florian: Does that match implementations?
  • Florian: Hasn't it shipped?
  • Florian: So Apple since you have more are the rest used?
  • Florian: So should it be at risk?
  • Florian: They're in gecko prefix and ?
  • SimonSapin: Do we want a single selector or more than one?
  • TabAtkins: What are they caring about?
  • Behave like that?
  • Changed or deleted or whatever?
  • Com/twbs/bootstrap/search?
  • Dbaron: Aren't they in 3?
  • Dbaron: Aren't they not new?
  • Dbaron: Did you fix the what counts as white space?
  • Dbaron: Is anyone planning to implementing this in the near future?
  • Dbaron: Is the thing they want to reference is the algorithm?
  • Demand?
  • Empty?
  • Erroneously & didn't match, but now will start matching?
  • Fantasai: ::first-line:not(:focus)?
  • Fantasai: Any opinions to add?
  • Fantasai: Anybody else?
  • Fantasai: As a syntax error, or never match?
  • Fantasai: Do they need to be in?
  • Fantasai: Do you want to?
  • Fantasai: Does that all work for everyone?
  • Fantasai: Everybody agrees?
  • Fantasai: How is that different than pseudo-elements?
  • Fantasai: Other opinions?
  • Fantasai: You can't hook into nth-of-type code?
  • Have marked it as :user-invalid, but it's valid?
  • Have never shown up?
  • Implemented it unprefixed?
  • In invalid?
  • Interested in implementing?
  • Invalid, valid but not matching?
  • Leaverou: Is this solved by the last issue?
  • Leaverou: So is this a pseudo-class that relies on DP?
  • Leaverou: What selectors would that pseudoclass accept?
  • Liam: The contents of :not have the same restrictions?
  • Make the selector invalid?
  • Next level?
  • Of code to figure that out?
  • Plinss: Can we move on?
  • Plinss: Has anyone heard from jdaggett?
  • Plinss: Have we published a FPWD of this?
  • Plinss: Is it completely equivalent to :has?
  • Plinss: So not ready to publish?
  • Say pseudo-element:not(p)?
  • Section might be changed?
  • Selecting an element based on its content?
  • Tags and they can have attr and types?
  • Tantek: And active requires hit testing?
  • Tantek: Are there limits that can go on the spec?
  • Tantek: Because it's a WD why not 4?
  • Tantek: Has anyone else implemented?
  • Tantek: Implementations?
  • Tantek: Is there anyone else that will implement?
  • Tantek: It couldn't have began with shadow to distinguish?
  • Tantek: Should not must?
  • Tantek: So how useful is that?
  • Tantek: So is this the distinction is between active and valid?
  • Tantek: The HTML group?
  • Tantek: What case of generated content before you hover?
  • Tantek: Why is this useful?
  • Tantek: You don't like nth?
  • Testing?
  • That element?
  • There be compat problems?
  • There were issues?
  • This in?
  • User-invalid and add :user-valid as its opposite?
  • Years?
  • Your markup, right?

External Links {🔗}(33)

2.61s.