LISTS . W3 . ORG {}

Analyzed Page
Matching Content Categories
CMS
Monthly Traffic Estimate
How Does Lists.w3.org Make Money
Keywords
Topics
Questions
External Links

We are analyzing https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0109.html.

Title:
[CSSWG] Minutes Telecom 2015-08-12 from Dael Jackson on 2015-08-12 ([email protected] from August 2015)
Description:
No description found...
Website Age:
31 years and 0 months (reg. 1994-07-06).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

Graphic Design
Telecommunications
Video & Online Content

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is lists.w3.org built with?

Website use hypermail 3.0.0, see https://github.com/hypermail-project/hypermail/.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of lists.w3.org audience?

🚄 Respectable Traffic: 10k - 20k visitors per month

Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Lists.w3.org Make Money? {💸}

We don't see any clear sign of profit-making.

Not all websites focus on profit; some are designed to educate, connect people, or share useful tools. People create websites for numerous reasons. And this could be one such example. Lists.w3.org has a secret sauce for making money, but we can't detect it yet.

Keywords {🔍}

smallcaps, jdaggett, fantasai, font, plinss, fallback, fonts, tabatkins, dont, youre, gregwhitworth, synthetic, chrisl, leaverou, myles, astearns, bold, message, isnt, caps, case, dauwhe, author, put, make, tantek, people, features, tests, support, test, lot, real, turn, feature, back, good, work, fontsynthesis, resolved, wait, suite, defined, flex, add, doesnt, behavior, thing, theyre, transform,

Topics {✒️}

org/archives/public/www-style/2015jul/0463 org/archives/public/www-style/2015jul/0429 org/archives/public/www-style/2015aug/0058 tab atkins jr unprefix min/max content david baron supporting true small-caps real small-caps situation selecting real small-caps bert' org message-id max-content contribution options related messages pre-multiplied true small-caps small-caps variant hear designer opinions synthesized small-caps synthesized small-caps genuine small-caps mailing list underlying technical implications wrt fallback stuf changing animation-delay real world designs introducing small-caps synthetic small-caps max-content historically synthetic bold font feature values creating opt-outs font selection property small-caps feature real capital glyphs basic test suite progressive enhancement support small-caps time small-caps full test suite message previous message message body respond font-weight bold archives search synthetic bold/italics random content add topics text-transform lowercase css fonts 3 css 3 fonts [css-animations]

Questions {❓}

do we have a test suite for these?
ChrisL: Could you justify that?
ChrisL: You mean which version?
Re: [css-animations] Should changing animation-delay cause an animation to run?
TabAtkins: Anyone object?
TabAtkins: Has fantasai gone silent?
To the F2F?
Authors do this?
Control and it doesn't matter?
Fantasai: Have you heard back from any moz devs?
Fantasai: Why is it bold and italic are and small-caps isn't?
Gregwhitworth: Do we have a test suite?
Gregwhitworth: So you don't have any reservations?
Jdaggett, you said you can live with it?
Jdaggett: So astearns you think this is necessary?
Jdaggett: What was the motivation for this?
Leaverou: So is that what you want in the markup?
Mailing list?
Need to get it done?
No @font?
Not load right?
Plinss: Aaaaaaanyone?
Plinss: Anything else?
Plinss: Can you sum up in a sentence or two?
Plinss: Does anyone have anything to add?
Plinss: Okay, do we want to action them to look?
Plinss: Who wants to talk about these?
Properties?
Small-caps as well, no?
Small-caps, but what do you do instead?
Thing with super and subscript fonts?

External Links {🔗}(7)

2.12s.