We are analyzing https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40359-016-0135-2.

Title:
Psychology, replication & beyond | BMC Psychology
Description:
Modern psychology is apparently in crisis and the prevailing view is that this partly reflects an inability to replicate past findings. If a crisis does exists, then it is some kind of ‘chronic’ crisis, as psychologists have been censuring themselves over replicability for decades. While the debate in psychology is not new, the lack of progress across the decades is disappointing. Recently though, we have seen a veritable surfeit of debate alongside multiple orchestrated and well-publicised replication initiatives. The spotlight is being shone on certain areas and although not everyone agrees on how we should interpret the outcomes, the debate is happening and impassioned. The issue of reproducibility occupies a central place in our whig history of psychology.
Website Age:
28 years and 1 months (reg. 1997-05-29).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

Education
Science
Social Networks

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is link.springer.com built with?

Custom-built

No common CMS systems were detected on Link.springer.com, and no known web development framework was identified.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of link.springer.com audience?

🌠 Phenomenal Traffic: 5M - 10M visitors per month

Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 5,000,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Link.springer.com Make Money? {💸}

The income method remains a mystery to us.

Some websites aren't about earning revenue; they're built to connect communities or raise awareness. There are numerous motivations behind creating websites. This might be one of them. Link.springer.com could have a money-making trick up its sleeve, but it's undetectable for now.

Keywords {🔍}

psychology, replication, google, scholar, article, studies, findings, social, replications, effect, pubmed, psychol, metaanalysis, science, original, research, replicated, published, evidence, psychologists, issue, effects, replicate, data, study, project, soc, journals, bmc, open, psychological, labs, participants, priming, results, finding, journal, failed, pipeline, statistical, replicability, researchers, hypotheses, hypothesis, bias, collaboration, authors, reported, experiments, cited,

Topics {✒️}

natural-unconscious/201205/priming-effects-replicate experiencing physical warmth post-publication open evaluation article download pdf supplementing traditional meta-analysis pre-publication independent replications controlled meta-analysis conducted physical cleanliness reduce privacy choices/manage cookies meta-analysis partially replicate recalling moral behavior schizophrenia meta-analysis database creative commons license plain language…precognition interpersonal warmth seemingly incredible findings high impact journals high-impact journals “… high-impact journals publishing direct replications past 2 years including computer screen hid claims give rise unscrambling jumbled sentences convert existing things front comput neurosci adams jr ab serotonin transporter gene research groups examining conditions privacy policy anomalous retroactive influences social network opinions meta‐analytic integration soc behav pers open science collaboration meta-analysis rightly enduring historical abandonment warm therapeutic packs eye tracking machines extensive literature search confuses retrospective sanctification aesthetic standards grease noise reduction model address data sharing exp psychol gen single significant p significant effect size main content log parental interference lead mention “…adversarial collaboration

Questions {❓}

And how many of the effects have we established are false?
Behavioral priming: It’s all in the mind but whose mind?
Does cleanliness influence moral judgments?
Does it matter if we replicate a finding once, twice, or 20 times, what ratio of positive to negative outcomes do we find acceptable?
Does recalling moral behavior change the perception of brightness?
How often do direct and conceptual replications occur in psychology?
How preposterous can we get?
How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging?
Indeed, the authors paint a considered and faithful picture of what their findings mean when they conclude “…how many of the effects have we established are true?
Is it light or dark?
Is this a limitation of the project design?
Meta-analysis: rescue remedy or statistical alchemy?
On the other hand, if it is preposterous to start with, why test it?
Other notable examples exist such as cognitive neuropsychology, where the single case study has been predominant for decades – how can anyone recreate the brain injury and subsequent cognitive testing in a second patient?
Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur?
Science or art?
Should we not also try to replicate null findings?
This raises the thorny question of who should replicate?
What are we replicating and why?
Why are replication rates lower in the latter two projects?

Schema {🗺️}

WebPage:
      mainEntity:
         headline:Psychology, replication & beyond
         description:Modern psychology is apparently in crisis and the prevailing view is that this partly reflects an inability to replicate past findings. If a crisis does exists, then it is some kind of ‘chronic’ crisis, as psychologists have been censuring themselves over replicability for decades. While the debate in psychology is not new, the lack of progress across the decades is disappointing. Recently though, we have seen a veritable surfeit of debate alongside multiple orchestrated and well-publicised replication initiatives. The spotlight is being shone on certain areas and although not everyone agrees on how we should interpret the outcomes, the debate is happening and impassioned. The issue of reproducibility occupies a central place in our whig history of psychology.
         datePublished:2016-06-01T00:00:00Z
         dateModified:2016-06-01T00:00:00Z
         pageStart:1
         pageEnd:8
         license:http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
         sameAs:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0135-2
         keywords:
            Psychology Research
            Clinical Psychology
            Cognitive Psychology
         image:
         isPartOf:
            name:BMC Psychology
            issn:
               2050-7283
            volumeNumber:4
            type:
               Periodical
               PublicationVolume
         publisher:
            name:BioMed Central
            logo:
               url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
               type:ImageObject
            type:Organization
         author:
               name:Keith R. Laws
               affiliation:
                     name:School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire
                     address:
                        name:School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
                        type:PostalAddress
                     type:Organization
               email:[email protected]
               type:Person
         isAccessibleForFree:1
         type:ScholarlyArticle
      context:https://schema.org
ScholarlyArticle:
      headline:Psychology, replication & beyond
      description:Modern psychology is apparently in crisis and the prevailing view is that this partly reflects an inability to replicate past findings. If a crisis does exists, then it is some kind of ‘chronic’ crisis, as psychologists have been censuring themselves over replicability for decades. While the debate in psychology is not new, the lack of progress across the decades is disappointing. Recently though, we have seen a veritable surfeit of debate alongside multiple orchestrated and well-publicised replication initiatives. The spotlight is being shone on certain areas and although not everyone agrees on how we should interpret the outcomes, the debate is happening and impassioned. The issue of reproducibility occupies a central place in our whig history of psychology.
      datePublished:2016-06-01T00:00:00Z
      dateModified:2016-06-01T00:00:00Z
      pageStart:1
      pageEnd:8
      license:http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
      sameAs:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0135-2
      keywords:
         Psychology Research
         Clinical Psychology
         Cognitive Psychology
      image:
      isPartOf:
         name:BMC Psychology
         issn:
            2050-7283
         volumeNumber:4
         type:
            Periodical
            PublicationVolume
      publisher:
         name:BioMed Central
         logo:
            url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
            type:ImageObject
         type:Organization
      author:
            name:Keith R. Laws
            affiliation:
                  name:School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire
                  address:
                     name:School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
                     type:PostalAddress
                  type:Organization
            email:[email protected]
            type:Person
      isAccessibleForFree:1
["Periodical","PublicationVolume"]:
      name:BMC Psychology
      issn:
         2050-7283
      volumeNumber:4
Organization:
      name:BioMed Central
      logo:
         url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
         type:ImageObject
      name:School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire
      address:
         name:School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
         type:PostalAddress
ImageObject:
      url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
Person:
      name:Keith R. Laws
      affiliation:
            name:School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire
            address:
               name:School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
               type:PostalAddress
            type:Organization
      email:[email protected]
PostalAddress:
      name:School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK

External Links {🔗}(135)

Analytics and Tracking {📊}

Google Tag Manager

Libraries {📚}

Clipboard.js
Prism.js

CDN Services {📦}

Crossref

4.96s.

LINK . SPRINGER . COM {}