We are analyzing https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/bf01197559.

Title:
A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems | Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
Description:
A standard technique for generating the Pareto set in multicriteria optimization problems is to minimize (convex) weighted sums of the different objectives for various different settings of the weights. However, it is well-known that this method succeeds in getting points from all parts of the Pareto set only when the Pareto curve is convex. This article provides a geometrical argument as to why this is the case. Secondly, it is a frequent observation that even for convex Pareto curves, an evenly distributed set of weights fails to produce an even distribution of points from all parts of the Pareto set. This article aims to identify the mechanism behind this observation. Roughly, the weight is related to the slope of the Pareto curve in the objective space in a way such that an even spread of Pareto points actually corresponds to often very uneven distributions of weights. Several examples are provided showing assumed shapes of Pareto curves and the distribution of weights corresponding to an even spread of points on those Pareto curves.
Website Age:
28 years and 1 months (reg. 1997-05-29).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

Technology & Computing
Virtual Reality
Graphic Design

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is link.springer.com built with?

Custom-built

No common CMS systems were detected on Link.springer.com, and no known web development framework was identified.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of link.springer.com audience?

🌠 Phenomenal Traffic: 5M - 10M visitors per month

Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 5,000,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Link.springer.com Make Money? {💸}

We find it hard to spot revenue streams.

Not all websites are made for profit; some exist to inform or educate users. Or any other reason why people make websites. And this might be the case. Link.springer.com might be making money, but it's not detectable how they're doing it.

Keywords {🔍}

optimization, pareto, article, set, problems, multicriteria, privacy, cookies, content, points, distribution, access, springer, information, publish, research, search, dennis, weights, method, google, scholar, data, log, journal, structural, weighted, sums, objectives, convex, observation, curves, related, multiobjective, chapter, control, discover, design, york, download, optional, personal, parties, policy, find, track, closer, drawbacks, minimizing, generation,

Topics {✒️}

month download article/chapter standard technique multiple-objective problems objective space frequent observation generating pareto-optimal points multicriteria optimization problems bicriterial optimization problems privacy choices/manage cookies pareto-optimal solutions multicriteria design optimization full article pdf multicriteria truss optimization uneven distributions related subjects distribution control european economic area scope submit manuscript normal-boundary intersection reference point approximation proper equality constraints check access instant access conditions privacy policy evenly distributed set minimizing weighted sums structural optimization 14 pareto set generation accepting optional cookies main content log weight vector set journal finder publish multicriteria optimization article aims convex pareto curves sobieski rights privacy policy personal data article log books a article das weighted sums observation article cite pareto set optional cookies manage preferences distribution pareto curves data protection

Schema {🗺️}

WebPage:
      mainEntity:
         headline:A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems
         description:A standard technique for generating the Pareto set in multicriteria optimization problems is to minimize (convex) weighted sums of the different objectives for various different settings of the weights. However, it is well-known that this method succeeds in getting points from all parts of the Pareto set only when the Pareto curve is convex. This article provides a geometrical argument as to why this is the case. Secondly, it is a frequent observation that even for convex Pareto curves, an evenly distributed set of weights fails to produce an even distribution of points from all parts of the Pareto set. This article aims to identify the mechanism behind this observation. Roughly, the weight is related to the slope of the Pareto curve in the objective space in a way such that an even spread of Pareto points actually corresponds to often very uneven distributions of weights. Several examples are provided showing assumed shapes of Pareto curves and the distribution of weights corresponding to an even spread of points on those Pareto curves.
         datePublished:
         dateModified:
         pageStart:63
         pageEnd:69
         sameAs:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197559
         keywords:
            Civil Engineer
            Standard Technique
            Uneven Distribution
            Objective Space
            Frequent Observation
            Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
            Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis
            Engineering Design
         image:
         isPartOf:
            name:Structural optimization
            issn:
               1615-1488
               0934-4373
            volumeNumber:14
            type:
               Periodical
               PublicationVolume
         publisher:
            name:Springer-Verlag
            logo:
               url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
               type:ImageObject
            type:Organization
         author:
               name:I. Das
               affiliation:
                     name:Rice University of Houston
                     address:
                        name:Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice University of Houston, USA
                        type:PostalAddress
                     type:Organization
               type:Person
               name:J. E. Dennis
               affiliation:
                     name:Rice University of Houston
                     address:
                        name:Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice University of Houston, USA
                        type:PostalAddress
                     type:Organization
               type:Person
         isAccessibleForFree:
         hasPart:
            isAccessibleForFree:
            cssSelector:.main-content
            type:WebPageElement
         type:ScholarlyArticle
      context:https://schema.org
ScholarlyArticle:
      headline:A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems
      description:A standard technique for generating the Pareto set in multicriteria optimization problems is to minimize (convex) weighted sums of the different objectives for various different settings of the weights. However, it is well-known that this method succeeds in getting points from all parts of the Pareto set only when the Pareto curve is convex. This article provides a geometrical argument as to why this is the case. Secondly, it is a frequent observation that even for convex Pareto curves, an evenly distributed set of weights fails to produce an even distribution of points from all parts of the Pareto set. This article aims to identify the mechanism behind this observation. Roughly, the weight is related to the slope of the Pareto curve in the objective space in a way such that an even spread of Pareto points actually corresponds to often very uneven distributions of weights. Several examples are provided showing assumed shapes of Pareto curves and the distribution of weights corresponding to an even spread of points on those Pareto curves.
      datePublished:
      dateModified:
      pageStart:63
      pageEnd:69
      sameAs:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197559
      keywords:
         Civil Engineer
         Standard Technique
         Uneven Distribution
         Objective Space
         Frequent Observation
         Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
         Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis
         Engineering Design
      image:
      isPartOf:
         name:Structural optimization
         issn:
            1615-1488
            0934-4373
         volumeNumber:14
         type:
            Periodical
            PublicationVolume
      publisher:
         name:Springer-Verlag
         logo:
            url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
            type:ImageObject
         type:Organization
      author:
            name:I. Das
            affiliation:
                  name:Rice University of Houston
                  address:
                     name:Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice University of Houston, USA
                     type:PostalAddress
                  type:Organization
            type:Person
            name:J. E. Dennis
            affiliation:
                  name:Rice University of Houston
                  address:
                     name:Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice University of Houston, USA
                     type:PostalAddress
                  type:Organization
            type:Person
      isAccessibleForFree:
      hasPart:
         isAccessibleForFree:
         cssSelector:.main-content
         type:WebPageElement
["Periodical","PublicationVolume"]:
      name:Structural optimization
      issn:
         1615-1488
         0934-4373
      volumeNumber:14
Organization:
      name:Springer-Verlag
      logo:
         url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
         type:ImageObject
      name:Rice University of Houston
      address:
         name:Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice University of Houston, USA
         type:PostalAddress
      name:Rice University of Houston
      address:
         name:Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice University of Houston, USA
         type:PostalAddress
ImageObject:
      url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
Person:
      name:I. Das
      affiliation:
            name:Rice University of Houston
            address:
               name:Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice University of Houston, USA
               type:PostalAddress
            type:Organization
      name:J. E. Dennis
      affiliation:
            name:Rice University of Houston
            address:
               name:Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice University of Houston, USA
               type:PostalAddress
            type:Organization
PostalAddress:
      name:Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice University of Houston, USA
      name:Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice University of Houston, USA
WebPageElement:
      isAccessibleForFree:
      cssSelector:.main-content

External Links {🔗}(32)

Analytics and Tracking {📊}

Google Tag Manager

Libraries {📚}

Clipboard.js
Prism.js

CDN Services {📦}

Crossref

4.51s.

LINK . SPRINGER . COM {}