Here's how GITHUB.COM makes money* and how much!

*Please read our disclaimer before using our estimates.
Loading...

GITHUB . COM {}

Detected CMS Systems:

  1. Analyzed Page
  2. Matching Content Categories
  3. CMS
  4. Monthly Traffic Estimate
  5. How Does Github.com Make Money
  6. How Much Does Github.com Make
  7. Wordpress Themes And Plugins
  8. Keywords
  9. Topics
  10. Payment Methods
  11. Questions
  12. Schema
  13. External Links
  14. Analytics And Tracking
  15. Libraries
  16. Hosting Providers

We are analyzing https://github.com/w3c/epub-specs/issues/1944.

Title:
What happens to features that do not get enough implementation in CR? · Issue #1944 · w3c/epub-specs
Description:
The title tells it all... In an average W3C Recommendation process, the answer to this question would be to remove this feature from the specification. However, the backward compatibility requirement of our charter forbids us to remove a...
Website Age:
17 years and 9 months (reg. 2007-10-09).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

  • Dating & Relationships
  • Movies
  • Video & Online Content

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is github.com built with?


Github.com uses WORDPRESS.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?

🚀🌠 Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,666,346 visitors per month in the current month.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Github.com Make Money? {💸}


Subscription Packages {💳}

We've located a dedicated page on github.com that might include details about subscription plans or recurring payments. We identified it based on the word pricing in one of its internal links. Below, you'll find additional estimates for its monthly recurring revenues.

How Much Does Github.com Make? {💰}


Subscription Packages {💳}

Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($). They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 5,347,483 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $22,459,429.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $269,513,148.

Wordpress Themes and Plugins {🎨}

What WordPress theme does this site use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.

What WordPress plugins does this website use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.

Keywords {🔍}

features, feature, commented, implementation, iherman, specification, mattgarrish, issue, future, member, question, epub, implementations, current, risky, sign, issues, remove, dauwhe, experience, implemented, authors, musts, deprecated, optional, beta, content, projects, answer, backward, compatibility, contributor, author, unsupported, spec, legacy, rss, implement, epubcheck, decide, standard, incubated, navigation, open, pull, requests, actions, security, description, recommendation,

Topics {✒️}

aligning epub terminology expect epub check backward compatibility requirement harm backward compatibility working group call digestion pipelines make comment metadata assignees type projects projects milestone independent interoperable implementations implementations publicly deployed 3 revision spec-epub3 adequate implementation experience formal terms open question future status listing optional features content document add risky class core epub 3 current description implementation experience current specification implemented standard feature process document recommendation type unsupported features content issue affects current spec implementations created epub 3 optional features implementation landscape title tells charter forbids transition request ralph swick sufficiently clear normative statements migration paths older specifications actively discouraged intermediate stage migration path precisely documented case listed put forward wg thinks optional feature

Payment Methods {📊}

  • Braintree

Questions {❓}

  • (If something is impractical, for example, why isn't it deprecated?
  • Aligning EPUB terminology on outdated features with HTML5?
  • Already have an account?
  • Clarification: are we talking only about the MUSTs, or all the normative statements?
  • Does that imply they will be supported in the future?
  • What about just calling these "beta" features?
  • What happens to features that do not get enough implementation in CR?
  • Are implementations publicly deployed?
  • Are there implementations created by people other than the authors of the specification?
  • Are there independent interoperable implementations of the current specification?
  • Are there reports of difficulties or problems with implementation?
  • Is each feature of the current specification implemented, and how is this demonstrated?
  • Is there implementation experience at all levels of the specification’s ecosystem (authoring, consuming, publishing…)?

Schema {🗺️}

DiscussionForumPosting:
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:What happens to features that do not get enough implementation in CR?
      articleBody:The title tells it all... In an average W3C Recommendation process, the answer to this question would be to _remove_ this feature from the specification. However, the backward compatibility requirement of our charter forbids us to remove an existing feature (unless is is specifically 3.3 only), hence the question in the issue. This question must have a clean answer _before_ we ask for a transition request. I copy this issue to Ralph Swick (@swickr) because his opinion is crucial on what we propose to do.
      author:
         url:https://github.com/iherman
         type:Person
         name:iherman
      datePublished:2021-11-30T16:26:45.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:15
      url:https://github.com/1944/epub-specs/issues/1944
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:What happens to features that do not get enough implementation in CR?
      articleBody:The title tells it all... In an average W3C Recommendation process, the answer to this question would be to _remove_ this feature from the specification. However, the backward compatibility requirement of our charter forbids us to remove an existing feature (unless is is specifically 3.3 only), hence the question in the issue. This question must have a clean answer _before_ we ask for a transition request. I copy this issue to Ralph Swick (@swickr) because his opinion is crucial on what we propose to do.
      author:
         url:https://github.com/iherman
         type:Person
         name:iherman
      datePublished:2021-11-30T16:26:45.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:15
      url:https://github.com/1944/epub-specs/issues/1944
Person:
      url:https://github.com/iherman
      name:iherman
      url:https://github.com/iherman
      name:iherman
InteractionCounter:
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:15
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:15

External Links {🔗}(6)

Analytics and Tracking {📊}

  • Site Verification - Google

Libraries {📚}

  • Clipboard.js
  • D3.js
  • GSAP
  • Lodash

Emails and Hosting {✉️}

Mail Servers:

  • aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

Name Servers:

  • dns1.p08.nsone.net
  • dns2.p08.nsone.net
  • dns3.p08.nsone.net
  • dns4.p08.nsone.net
  • ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
  • ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
  • ns-421.awsdns-52.com
  • ns-520.awsdns-01.net
8.97s.