Here's how GITHUB.COM makes money* and how much!

*Please read our disclaimer before using our estimates.
Loading...

GITHUB . COM {}

Detected CMS Systems:

  1. Analyzed Page
  2. Matching Content Categories
  3. CMS
  4. Monthly Traffic Estimate
  5. How Does Github.com Make Money
  6. How Much Does Github.com Make
  7. Wordpress Themes And Plugins
  8. Keywords
  9. Topics
  10. Payment Methods
  11. Questions
  12. Schema
  13. External Links
  14. Analytics And Tracking
  15. Libraries
  16. Hosting Providers

We are analyzing https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983.

Title:
[css-display] "flow-root" for property "display" is harmful · Issue #983 · w3c/csswg-drafts
Description:
"display: flow-root" is harmful: requires to use an extra Element spec doesn't support display multiple values like display: flex flow-root Please implement a new/different property f...
Website Age:
17 years and 9 months (reg. 2007-10-09).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

  • Technology & Computing
  • Mobile Technology & AI
  • Virtual Reality

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is github.com built with?


Github.com is based on WORDPRESS.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?

🚀🌠 Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,000,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Github.com Make Money? {💸}


Subscription Packages {💳}

We've located a dedicated page on github.com that might include details about subscription plans or recurring payments. We identified it based on the word pricing in one of its internal links. Below, you'll find additional estimates for its monthly recurring revenues.

How Much Does Github.com Make? {💰}


Subscription Packages {💳}

Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($). They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 5,013,426 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $21,056,387.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $252,676,649.

Wordpress Themes and Plugins {🎨}

What WordPress theme does this site use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.

What WordPress plugins does this website use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.

Keywords {🔍}

display, flowroot, laukstein, fantasai, block, cssdisplay, flex, div, formatting, context, sign, property, harmful, issue, closed, selector, commented, projects, values, classselectordiv, elements, added, invalid, reason, container, fieldset, content, navigation, pull, requests, actions, security, requires, extra, element, support, multiple, apply, clearfix, thousands, edited, edits, author, current, work, collaborator, inline, rejected, dont, btw,

Topics {✒️}

personal information [css-display] laukstein edits author activity laukstein mentioned binyamin laukstein wrote multiple values support [css-display] extra element spec fantasai closed legacy rendering rules backwards-compatibility requirements comment metadata assignees type projects inline automatically establish email collaborator apply `formatting context' min-content apply flow-root flow-root needed projects milestone flex flow-root display values invalid tracked display types min-height formatting context 'formatting context' flow-root //drafts csswg issue flex element list-item quirkier days older web milestone relationships elements/cases clearfix github makes reason existing property selector display invalid 2 thousands harmful elements inline elements cases flex

Payment Methods {📊}

  • Braintree

Questions {❓}

  • Already have an account?
  • Any more elements/cases like that?
  • BTW any reason why
    has 'formatting context', example?
  • Imagine if flow-root needed for 2 thousands of Elements - will you require to add in DOM extra 2 thousands Elements only for "clearfix"?
  • Com/pobiluyusu/quiet>?
  • Org/css-box/#min-max?
  • Selector?

Schema {🗺️}

DiscussionForumPosting:
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:[css-display] "flow-root" for property "display" is harmful
      articleBody:"display: flow-root" is harmful: 1. requires to use an extra Element 2. spec doesn't support display multiple values like `display: flex flow-root` Please implement a new/different property for "flow-root"! Seems any existing property without multiple values support will be harmful ... How you would want to apply **flow-root** for **flex** Element .selector? .selector { display: flex; } <div class=selector></div> It requires: .clearfix { display: flow-root; } .selector { display: flex; } <div class=clearfix> <div class=selector></div> </div> If nothing changed, the the old approach is perhaps better: .selector { display: flex; } .selector:after { content: “”; display: block; clear: both; } <div class=selector></div> Imagine if **flow-root** needed for 2 thousands of Elements - will you require to add in DOM extra 2 thousands Elements only for "clearfix"? ...
      author:
         url:https://github.com/laukstein
         type:Person
         name:laukstein
      datePublished:2017-01-25T10:03:23.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:4
      url:https://github.com/983/csswg-drafts/issues/983
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:[css-display] "flow-root" for property "display" is harmful
      articleBody:"display: flow-root" is harmful: 1. requires to use an extra Element 2. spec doesn't support display multiple values like `display: flex flow-root` Please implement a new/different property for "flow-root"! Seems any existing property without multiple values support will be harmful ... How you would want to apply **flow-root** for **flex** Element .selector? .selector { display: flex; } <div class=selector></div> It requires: .clearfix { display: flow-root; } .selector { display: flex; } <div class=clearfix> <div class=selector></div> </div> If nothing changed, the the old approach is perhaps better: .selector { display: flex; } .selector:after { content: “”; display: block; clear: both; } <div class=selector></div> Imagine if **flow-root** needed for 2 thousands of Elements - will you require to add in DOM extra 2 thousands Elements only for "clearfix"? ...
      author:
         url:https://github.com/laukstein
         type:Person
         name:laukstein
      datePublished:2017-01-25T10:03:23.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:4
      url:https://github.com/983/csswg-drafts/issues/983
Person:
      url:https://github.com/laukstein
      name:laukstein
      url:https://github.com/laukstein
      name:laukstein
InteractionCounter:
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:4
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:4

External Links {🔗}(6)

Analytics and Tracking {📊}

  • Site Verification - Google

Libraries {📚}

  • Clipboard.js
  • D3.js
  • GSAP
  • Lodash

Emails and Hosting {✉️}

Mail Servers:

  • aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

Name Servers:

  • dns1.p08.nsone.net
  • dns2.p08.nsone.net
  • dns3.p08.nsone.net
  • dns4.p08.nsone.net
  • ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
  • ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
  • ns-421.awsdns-52.com
  • ns-520.awsdns-01.net
9.1s.