GITHUB . COM {}

Detected CMS Systems:

Wordpress (2 occurrences)

Analyzed Page
Matching Content Categories
CMS
Monthly Traffic Estimate
How Does Github.com Make Money
How Much Does Github.com Make
Wordpress Themes And Plugins
Keywords
Topics
Payment Methods
Questions
Schema
External Links
Analytics And Tracking
Libraries
Hosting Providers

We are analyzing https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6471.

Title:
[cssom] Serialization of large numbers should use scientific notation · Issue #6471 · w3c/csswg-drafts
Description:
https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom/#serialize-a-css-component-value in the section has a note that says "scientific notation is not used." While this makes sense for small values so we serialize "0" instead of "6.123233995736766e-17" and thi...
Website Age:
17 years and 9 months (reg. 2007-10-09).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

Graphic Design
Science
TV

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is github.com built with?

Github.com employs WORDPRESS.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?

🚀🌠 Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month

Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,000,003 visitors per month in the current month.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Github.com Make Money? {💸}

Subscription Packages {💳}

We've located a dedicated page on github.com that might include details about subscription plans or recurring payments. We identified it based on the word pricing in one of its internal links. Below, you'll find additional estimates for its monthly recurring revenues.

How Much Does Github.com Make? {💰}

Subscription Packages {💳}

Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($). They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 5,013,418 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $21,056,355.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $252,676,258.

Wordpress Themes and Plugins {🎨}

What WordPress theme does this site use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.

What WordPress plugins does this website use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.

Keywords {🔍}

numbers, large, scientific, notation, agenda, cssom, current, sign, serialization, commented, number, digits, added, projects, issue, achristensen, behavior, script, work, tabatkins, scinot, integer, smfr, removed, cssmeetingbot, navigation, open, pull, requests, actions, security, note, makes, small, values, webkit, body, multiple, httpsbugswebkitorgshowbugcgiid, member, agreed, spec, syntax, decimal, point, isnt, dlibby, terms, documentbodystylelineheight, documentdocumentelementstylelineheight,

Topics {✒️}

discussed [cssom] serialization css working group style['line-height'] = 1e+26 current syntax spec completed astearns reopened full irc log comment metadata assignees multiple serialized representations earlier work [css-flexbox] type projects scinot automatically makes serializing large numbers web compat match serialization current behavior projects milestone ['line-height'] csswg resolution id=228190 based terms org/show_bug scientific notation '1e+06px' loirooriol mentioned //drafts makes sense multiple forms amend syntax large numbers csswg shortest form negative exponents tyler wilcock reflect reality small wrinkle z-index produce integers decimal point exponent exceeds expected behaviors numbers larger flex-grow milestone relationships id= true document small values serialize precision digits github

Payment Methods {📊}

Braintree

Questions {❓}

Already have an account?
Maybe we should specify that for numbers < X, use a set number of precision digits (in Blink I believe this is 6 currently), but numbers larger should use N precision digits where N is the number of digits (maybe +2?

Schema {🗺️}

DiscussionForumPosting:
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:[cssom] Serialization of large numbers should use scientific notation
      articleBody:https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom/#serialize-a-css-component-value in the <number> section has a note that says "scientific notation is not used." While this makes sense for small values so we serialize "0" instead of "6.123233995736766e-17" and this matches the behavior of Chrome and Firefox and I'm looking into implementing this in WebKit, for large numbers all browsers do use scientific notation, as illustrated by this simple example: ``` <body onload='checkLargeValues()'> <script> function checkLargeValues() { let target = document.getElementById('p'); target.style['line-height'] = 1e+26; alert(window.getComputedStyle(target)['line-height']) } </script> <p id="p"></p> </body> ``` The phrase "in the shortest form possible" is already in the text, which suggests to me that multiple forms are possible. I suggest the note be clarified to say something like "scientific notation is not used with negative exponents."
      author:
         url:https://github.com/achristensen07
         type:Person
         name:achristensen07
      datePublished:2021-07-23T01:38:53.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:8
      url:https://github.com/6471/csswg-drafts/issues/6471
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:[cssom] Serialization of large numbers should use scientific notation
      articleBody:https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom/#serialize-a-css-component-value in the <number> section has a note that says "scientific notation is not used." While this makes sense for small values so we serialize "0" instead of "6.123233995736766e-17" and this matches the behavior of Chrome and Firefox and I'm looking into implementing this in WebKit, for large numbers all browsers do use scientific notation, as illustrated by this simple example: ``` <body onload='checkLargeValues()'> <script> function checkLargeValues() { let target = document.getElementById('p'); target.style['line-height'] = 1e+26; alert(window.getComputedStyle(target)['line-height']) } </script> <p id="p"></p> </body> ``` The phrase "in the shortest form possible" is already in the text, which suggests to me that multiple forms are possible. I suggest the note be clarified to say something like "scientific notation is not used with negative exponents."
      author:
         url:https://github.com/achristensen07
         type:Person
         name:achristensen07
      datePublished:2021-07-23T01:38:53.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:8
      url:https://github.com/6471/csswg-drafts/issues/6471
Person:
      url:https://github.com/achristensen07
      name:achristensen07
      url:https://github.com/achristensen07
      name:achristensen07
InteractionCounter:
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:8
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:8

External Links {🔗}(5)

Analytics and Tracking {📊}

Site Verification - Google

Libraries {📚}

Clipboard.js
D3.js
GSAP
Lodash

Emails and Hosting {✉️}

Mail Servers:

aspmx.l.google.com
alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

Name Servers:

dns1.p08.nsone.net
dns2.p08.nsone.net
dns3.p08.nsone.net
dns4.p08.nsone.net
ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
ns-421.awsdns-52.com
ns-520.awsdns-01.net

9.45s.