
GITHUB . COM {
}
Detected CMS Systems:
- Wordpress (2 occurrences)
Title:
[selectors] :autofill pseudo-class Β· Issue #5775 Β· w3c/csswg-drafts
Description:
See whatwg/html#6181 for the reasons why I think we should add this pseudo-class. I think this is mostly uncontroversial, is there any reason people would think this is a bad idea / bad naming?
Website Age:
17 years and 8 months (reg. 2007-10-09).
Matching Content Categories {π}
- Mobile Technology & AI
- Social Networks
- Technology & Computing
Content Management System {π}
What CMS is github.com built with?
Github.com is powered by WORDPRESS.
Traffic Estimate {π}
What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?
ππ Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month
Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,000,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.
check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush
How Does Github.com Make Money? {πΈ}
Subscription Packages {π³}
We've located a dedicated page on github.com that might include details about subscription plans or recurring payments. We identified it based on the word pricing in one of its internal links. Below, you'll find additional estimates for its monthly recurring revenues.How Much Does Github.com Make? {π°}
Subscription Packages {π³}
Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($).
They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 4,989,889 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $20,957,532.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $251,490,385.
Wordpress Themes and Plugins {π¨}
What WordPress theme does this site use?
It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.
What WordPress plugins does this website use?
It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.
Keywords {π}
pseudoclass, selectors, autofill, emilio, csspseudo, commented, sign, current, work, loirooriol, projects, issue, closed, whatwghtml, added, contributor, edits, resolution, cssmeetingbot, group, privacy, navigation, pull, requests, actions, security, add, bad, agenda, mentioned, autofilled, user, match, author, removed, heycam, css, accepted, csswg, github, commenter, type, milestone, footer, skip, content, menu, product, solutions, resources,
Topics {βοΈ}
privacy-tracker group bringing autofill pseudo-class discussed [css-pseudo css working group personal information [selectors] pseudo-class full irc log comment metadata assignees csswg resolution emilio changed autofilled form fields resolution / edits privacy group type projects pseudo-elements css projects milestone user edits privacy reason people browsers agree ua styling needing response milestone relationships selectors [selectors] github author autofilled user skip jump sign reasons add uncontroversial activity clarify matches match defined guess require override agreed resolved free join conversation account
Payment Methods {π}
- Braintree
Questions {β}
- Already have an account?
- Can you clarify what exactly it matches?
- I think this is mostly uncontroversial, is there any reason people would think this is a bad idea / bad naming?
- The CSS Working Group just discussed [css-pseudo?
- Would we also require that UA styling of autofilled form fields be done in CSS so that the author can override them?
- [css-pseudo?
- Css-pseudo is for pseudo-elements, this is a pseudo-class, so I guess it would be in selectors?
Schema {πΊοΈ}
DiscussionForumPosting:
context:https://schema.org
headline:[selectors] :autofill pseudo-class
articleBody:See https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/6181 for the reasons why I think we should add this pseudo-class.
I think this is mostly uncontroversial, is there any reason people would think this is a bad idea / bad naming?
author:
url:https://github.com/emilio
type:Person
name:emilio
datePublished:2020-12-10T01:58:31.000Z
interactionStatistic:
type:InteractionCounter
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:19
url:https://github.com/5775/csswg-drafts/issues/5775
context:https://schema.org
headline:[selectors] :autofill pseudo-class
articleBody:See https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/6181 for the reasons why I think we should add this pseudo-class.
I think this is mostly uncontroversial, is there any reason people would think this is a bad idea / bad naming?
author:
url:https://github.com/emilio
type:Person
name:emilio
datePublished:2020-12-10T01:58:31.000Z
interactionStatistic:
type:InteractionCounter
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:19
url:https://github.com/5775/csswg-drafts/issues/5775
Person:
url:https://github.com/emilio
name:emilio
url:https://github.com/emilio
name:emilio
InteractionCounter:
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:19
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:19
External Links {π}(2)
Analytics and Tracking {π}
- Site Verification - Google
Libraries {π}
- Clipboard.js
- D3.js
- Lodash
Emails and Hosting {βοΈ}
Mail Servers:
- aspmx.l.google.com
- alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
Name Servers:
- dns1.p08.nsone.net
- dns2.p08.nsone.net
- dns3.p08.nsone.net
- dns4.p08.nsone.net
- ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
- ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
- ns-421.awsdns-52.com
- ns-520.awsdns-01.net