GITHUB . COM {}

Detected CMS Systems:

Wordpress (2 occurrences)

Analyzed Page
Matching Content Categories
CMS
Monthly Traffic Estimate
How Does Github.com Make Money
How Much Does Github.com Make
Wordpress Themes And Plugins
Keywords
Topics
Payment Methods
Questions
Schema
External Links
Analytics And Tracking
Libraries
Hosting Providers

We are analyzing https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5689.

Title:
[cssom] Is `round` special in CSSOM? · Issue #5689 · w3c/csswg-drafts
Description:
Context: moving the serialization of <color> values from CSSOM to CSS Color 4, per CSSWG resolution. I'm just checking that the new Color serialization section has everything needed befor...
Website Age:
17 years and 8 months (reg. 2007-10-09).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

Business & Finance
Family & Parenting
Dating & Relationships

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is github.com built with?

Github.com employs WORDPRESS.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?

🚀🌠 Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month

Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,000,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Github.com Make Money? {💸}

Subscription Packages {💳}

We've located a dedicated page on github.com that might include details about subscription plans or recurring payments. We identified it based on the word pricing in one of its internal links. Below, you'll find additional estimates for its monthly recurring revenues.

How Much Does Github.com Make? {💰}

Subscription Packages {💳}

Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($). They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 4,989,889 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $20,957,532.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $251,490,385.

Wordpress Themes and Plugins {🎨}

What WordPress theme does this site use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.

What WordPress plugins does this website use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.

Keywords {🔍}

round, cssom, css, commented, integer, svgeesus, rounded, current, work, issue, color, rounding, nearest, tabatkins, sign, values, argument, positive, added, member, fantasai, behavior, projects, special, serialization, part, infinity, matching, function, cssvalues, navigation, pull, requests, actions, security, closed, resolution, javascript, fractional, portion, absolute, decimal, place, half, wording, happy, csscolor, gibson, comment, agenda,

Topics {✒️}

serializing css values assigned labels closed css working group personal information [cssom] color serialization section full irc log commenter satisfied commenter type projects css color 4 rounding-driven tiebreaking comment metadata assignees halfway cases rounded included css change css color 4 spec css round positive numbers projects milestone ten values csswg resolution discussed [cssom] css issue rounding-positive equally close fractional portion higher absolute lower absolute decimal digit recommend rewording positive infinity plausible interpretation javascript ecosystem //drafts web platform internally consistent mathematical perspective /questions/3448/rules finite precision resolution / edits milestone relationships values round special `round` special round specially update round rounding behavior cssom pair nearest javascript math

Payment Methods {📊}

Braintree

Questions {❓}

Already have an account?
The CSS Working Group just discussed [cssom] Is `round` special in CSSOM?
Thus, is there utility in retaining this wording?
[cssom] Is `round` special in CSSOM?
[cssom] Is round special in CSSOM?

Schema {🗺️}

DiscussionForumPosting:
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:[cssom] Is `round` special in CSSOM?
      articleBody:Context: moving the serialization of <color> values from CSSOM to CSS Color 4, per CSSWG resolution. I'm just checking that [the new Color serialization section](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-color-4/#serializing-color-values) has everything needed before sending a PR to replace the corresponding part of CSSOM with a pointer. Several times in [Serializing CSS Values](https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom/#serialize-a-css-component-value) I see the phrase: > rounded to the closest integer (rounding up if two values are equally close) Looking at the documentation of [JavaScript `Math.round`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Math/round) > If the fractional portion of the argument is greater than 0.5, the argument is rounded to the integer with the next higher absolute value. If it is less than 0.5, the argument is rounded to the integer with the lower absolute value. If the fractional portion is exactly 0.5, the argument is rounded to the next integer in the direction of +∞. and again for [C++](http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/cmath/round/) > Returns the integral value that is nearest to x, with halfway cases rounded away from zero. Then, for positive numbers, this seems to be merely a restatement of part of the algorithm. In other words, the next decimal digit after the place to be rounded can take any one of ten values: `0`,`1`,`2`,`3`,`4`,`5`,`6`,`7`,`8`,`9` and of those, half of them (`0`,`1`,`2`,`3`,`4`) round down and half (`5`,`6`,`7`,`8`,`9`) round up. Thus, is there utility in retaining this wording? Or is it enough to just say "round". I'm happy either way, just want the Color 4 spec to be complete.
      author:
         url:https://github.com/svgeesus
         type:Person
         name:svgeesus
      datePublished:2020-10-31T13:52:45.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:10
      url:https://github.com/5689/csswg-drafts/issues/5689
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:[cssom] Is `round` special in CSSOM?
      articleBody:Context: moving the serialization of <color> values from CSSOM to CSS Color 4, per CSSWG resolution. I'm just checking that [the new Color serialization section](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-color-4/#serializing-color-values) has everything needed before sending a PR to replace the corresponding part of CSSOM with a pointer. Several times in [Serializing CSS Values](https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom/#serialize-a-css-component-value) I see the phrase: > rounded to the closest integer (rounding up if two values are equally close) Looking at the documentation of [JavaScript `Math.round`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Math/round) > If the fractional portion of the argument is greater than 0.5, the argument is rounded to the integer with the next higher absolute value. If it is less than 0.5, the argument is rounded to the integer with the lower absolute value. If the fractional portion is exactly 0.5, the argument is rounded to the next integer in the direction of +∞. and again for [C++](http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/cmath/round/) > Returns the integral value that is nearest to x, with halfway cases rounded away from zero. Then, for positive numbers, this seems to be merely a restatement of part of the algorithm. In other words, the next decimal digit after the place to be rounded can take any one of ten values: `0`,`1`,`2`,`3`,`4`,`5`,`6`,`7`,`8`,`9` and of those, half of them (`0`,`1`,`2`,`3`,`4`) round down and half (`5`,`6`,`7`,`8`,`9`) round up. Thus, is there utility in retaining this wording? Or is it enough to just say "round". I'm happy either way, just want the Color 4 spec to be complete.
      author:
         url:https://github.com/svgeesus
         type:Person
         name:svgeesus
      datePublished:2020-10-31T13:52:45.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:10
      url:https://github.com/5689/csswg-drafts/issues/5689
Person:
      url:https://github.com/svgeesus
      name:svgeesus
      url:https://github.com/svgeesus
      name:svgeesus
InteractionCounter:
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:10
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:10

External Links {🔗}(10)

Analytics and Tracking {📊}

Site Verification - Google

Libraries {📚}

Clipboard.js
D3.js
Lodash

Emails and Hosting {✉️}

Mail Servers:

aspmx.l.google.com
alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

Name Servers:

dns1.p08.nsone.net
dns2.p08.nsone.net
dns3.p08.nsone.net
dns4.p08.nsone.net
ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
ns-421.awsdns-52.com
ns-520.awsdns-01.net

9.61s.