GITHUB . COM {
}
Detected CMS Systems:
- Wordpress (2 occurrences)
Title:
[css-grid] editorial: ambiguities in §12.5 · Issue #507 · w3c/csswg-drafts
Description:
There are a couple of ambiguities in §12.5. Resolve Intrinsic Track Sizes, under "For auto minimums: ", 2nd paragraph: Otherwise, set its base size to the maximum of its items’ min-size contributions: the value specified by its respectiv...
Website Age:
17 years and 8 months (reg. 2007-10-09).
Matching Content Categories {📚}
- Graphic Design
- Telecommunications
- Books & Literature
Content Management System {📝}
What CMS is github.com built with?
Github.com is powered by WORDPRESS.
Traffic Estimate {📈}
What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?
🚀🌠 Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month
Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,653,780 visitors per month in the current month.
check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush
How Does Github.com Make Money? {💸}
Subscription Packages {💳}
We've located a dedicated page on github.com that might include details about subscription plans or recurring payments. We identified it based on the word pricing in one of its internal links. Below, you'll find additional estimates for its monthly recurring revenues.How Much Does Github.com Make? {💰}
Subscription Packages {💳}
Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($).
They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 5,316,107 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $22,327,651.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $267,931,808.
Wordpress Themes and Plugins {🎨}
What WordPress theme does this site use?
It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.
What WordPress plugins does this website use?
It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.
Keywords {🔍}
fantasai, cssgrid, closed, definition, added, sign, editorial, issue, tabatkins, text, projects, ambiguities, matspalmgren, auto, size, items, minsize, relevant, contribution, clear, reference, commented, navigation, pull, requests, actions, security, minimums, paragraph, contributions, properties, whichever, axis, sentence, term, separate, accepted, commenter, response, pending, point, tracked, doc, milestone, github, type, footer, skip, content, menu,
Topics {✒️}
min-width/height values earlier doc css-grid-1 type items’ min-size contributions css-sizing min-content contribution min-size contribution definition respective min-width min-height properties width/height properties editorial tracked org/show_bug comment metadata assignees type projects separate chapter early address point 2 content contribution fantasai reopened tabatkins closed base size word size 2nd paragraph final period good idea standalone paragraph //drafts csswg separate sentence 100% complete relationships auto minimums definition includes whichever matches github entire text size term relevant axis sign auto definition sentence whichever axis relevant text skip jump ambiguities couple set maximum
Payment Methods {📊}
- Braintree
Questions {❓}
- Already have an account?
- It seems you did not address point 2?
- Computing the value to be used for the "auto minimums" clause?
Schema {🗺️}
DiscussionForumPosting:
context:https://schema.org
headline:[css-grid] editorial: ambiguities in §12.5
articleBody:There are a couple of ambiguities in §12.5. Resolve Intrinsic Track Sizes,
under "For auto minimums: ", 2nd paragraph:
> Otherwise, set its base size to the maximum of its items’ **_min-size contributions_**: the value specified by its respective min-width or min-height properties (whichever matches the relevant axis) if the specified **size** is auto, or else the item’s min-content contribution.
1. it's not clear what the word size is referring to there, it could be a reference to the min-width/height values earlier in the same sentence ,or it could be a reference to the width/height properties (whichever is relevant for the axis).
It appears that @tabatkins already agreed that it's the latter and that the text needs to be clearer:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1255393#c4
2. it's not clear how far the definition of the term 'min-size contributions' reaches.
Is it the entire text that follows, or is it just up to the first comma and that the "or else the item’s
in-content contribution" is not part of the definition, but rather something that just relevant to
computing the value to be used for the "auto minimums" clause?
(I will assume for now that the definition includes all the text up to the final period.)
In general, I think it would be a good idea to break out each definition of a term to
a standalone paragraph, rather than embedding it together with other text.
Perhaps in a separate chapter early in the document, like how it's done in css-sizing:
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing/#terms
author:
url:https://github.com/MatsPalmgren
type:Person
name:MatsPalmgren
datePublished:2016-09-21T00:11:53.000Z
interactionStatistic:
type:InteractionCounter
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:3
url:https://github.com/507/csswg-drafts/issues/507
context:https://schema.org
headline:[css-grid] editorial: ambiguities in §12.5
articleBody:There are a couple of ambiguities in §12.5. Resolve Intrinsic Track Sizes,
under "For auto minimums: ", 2nd paragraph:
> Otherwise, set its base size to the maximum of its items’ **_min-size contributions_**: the value specified by its respective min-width or min-height properties (whichever matches the relevant axis) if the specified **size** is auto, or else the item’s min-content contribution.
1. it's not clear what the word size is referring to there, it could be a reference to the min-width/height values earlier in the same sentence ,or it could be a reference to the width/height properties (whichever is relevant for the axis).
It appears that @tabatkins already agreed that it's the latter and that the text needs to be clearer:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1255393#c4
2. it's not clear how far the definition of the term 'min-size contributions' reaches.
Is it the entire text that follows, or is it just up to the first comma and that the "or else the item’s
in-content contribution" is not part of the definition, but rather something that just relevant to
computing the value to be used for the "auto minimums" clause?
(I will assume for now that the definition includes all the text up to the final period.)
In general, I think it would be a good idea to break out each definition of a term to
a standalone paragraph, rather than embedding it together with other text.
Perhaps in a separate chapter early in the document, like how it's done in css-sizing:
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing/#terms
author:
url:https://github.com/MatsPalmgren
type:Person
name:MatsPalmgren
datePublished:2016-09-21T00:11:53.000Z
interactionStatistic:
type:InteractionCounter
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:3
url:https://github.com/507/csswg-drafts/issues/507
Person:
url:https://github.com/MatsPalmgren
name:MatsPalmgren
url:https://github.com/MatsPalmgren
name:MatsPalmgren
InteractionCounter:
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:3
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:3
External Links {🔗}(4)
Analytics and Tracking {📊}
- Site Verification - Google
Libraries {📚}
- Clipboard.js
- D3.js
- Lodash
Emails and Hosting {✉️}
Mail Servers:
- aspmx.l.google.com
- alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
Name Servers:
- dns1.p08.nsone.net
- dns2.p08.nsone.net
- dns3.p08.nsone.net
- dns4.p08.nsone.net
- ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
- ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
- ns-421.awsdns-52.com
- ns-520.awsdns-01.net