GITHUB . COM {}

Matching Content Categories {📚}

• Mobile Technology & AI
• Social Networks
• Technology & Computing

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is github.com built with?

Github.com employs WORDPRESS.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?

🚀🌠 Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,000,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Github.com Make Money? {💸}

Subscription Packages {💳}

How Much Does Github.com Make? {💰}

Subscription Packages {💳}

Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($). They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 4,989,889 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $20,957,532.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $251,490,385.

Wordpress Themes and Plugins {🎨}

What WordPress theme does this site use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.

What WordPress plugins does this website use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.

Keywords {🔍}

image, data, commented, hidden, offtopic, tabatkins, schenneychromium, exif, orientation, chrishtr, cssimages, respect, sign, eeeps, projects, impls, issue, closed, imageorientation, fromimage, firefox, bug, chrome, current, author, navigation, pull, requests, actions, security, comment, reasonable, incompatible, streaming, display, progressively, render, flip, mentioned, changing, safari, support, pngs, png, spec, react, svgeesus, work, github, type,

Topics {✒️}

personal information [css-images-3] ignoring image-derived orientation [css-images] tabatkins mentioned type projects orientation data showing comment metadata assignees put exif data supporting image-orientation png spec technically respect exif data respect image-orientation /png-exif-orientation/ hidden image data 'image-orientation' respect orientation image libraries changing orientation 3 exif recommendations webkit bug streaming display progressively render uncertain complexity unnecessarily constrains future usage changing initial diversion due latest versions test linked rendering pipeline assumed satisfied 88% complete relationships support exif fairly reasonable github firefox bug chrome bug apparently safari' image image respect orientation png exif comment spec support reasonable chrome

Payment Methods {📊}

• Braintree

Questions {❓}

• Already have an account?

Schema {🗺️}

DiscussionForumPosting:
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:[css-images-3] Allow impls to not respect exif data if it's after the image data
      articleBody:In <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3799#issuecomment-610443730>, @eeeps brings up the fact that none of the browsers currently supporting `image-orientation: from-image;` respect the orientation if it comes *after* the image data. ([firefox bug](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1627423#c3), [webkit bug](https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210021#c4), [chrome bug](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1067846)) This is fairly reasonable, as it would be incompatible with streaming display of the image; it would progressively render in one orientation, and then flip around once it's finished. This is not only somewhat jarring, it seems to be incompatible with current browser image loading architectures, without some refactoring of uncertain complexity. I suggest that we explicitly allow impls to not respect orientation if it comes after the image data; possibly we should *restrict* them from doing so, tho I'm not sure if this unnecessarily constrains their future usage of image libraries.
      author:
         url:https://github.com/tabatkins
         type:Person
         name:tabatkins
      datePublished:2020-04-07T22:37:51.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:25
      url:https://github.com/4929/csswg-drafts/issues/4929
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:[css-images-3] Allow impls to not respect exif data if it's after the image data
      articleBody:In <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3799#issuecomment-610443730>, @eeeps brings up the fact that none of the browsers currently supporting `image-orientation: from-image;` respect the orientation if it comes *after* the image data. ([firefox bug](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1627423#c3), [webkit bug](https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210021#c4), [chrome bug](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1067846)) This is fairly reasonable, as it would be incompatible with streaming display of the image; it would progressively render in one orientation, and then flip around once it's finished. This is not only somewhat jarring, it seems to be incompatible with current browser image loading architectures, without some refactoring of uncertain complexity. I suggest that we explicitly allow impls to not respect orientation if it comes after the image data; possibly we should *restrict* them from doing so, tho I'm not sure if this unnecessarily constrains their future usage of image libraries.
      author:
         url:https://github.com/tabatkins
         type:Person
         name:tabatkins
      datePublished:2020-04-07T22:37:51.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:25
      url:https://github.com/4929/csswg-drafts/issues/4929
Person:
      url:https://github.com/tabatkins
      name:tabatkins
      url:https://github.com/tabatkins
      name:tabatkins
InteractionCounter:
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:25
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:25

External Links {🔗}(7)

• Check the income stats for https://github.blog
• What's the monthly money flow for https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1627423#c3?
• How much income is https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210021#c4 earning monthly?
• What's the monthly money flow for https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1067846?
• Financial intake of https://ericportis.com/etc/PNG-EXIF-orientation/
• Monthly income for http://ftp-osl.osuosl.org/pub/libpng/documents/pngext-1.5.0.html#C.eXIf
• Get to know https://www.githubstatus.com/'s earnings

Analytics and Tracking {📊}

• Site Verification - Google

Libraries {📚}

• Clipboard.js
• D3.js
• Lodash

Emails and Hosting {✉️}

Mail Servers:

• aspmx.l.google.com
• alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

Name Servers:

• dns1.p08.nsone.net
• dns2.p08.nsone.net
• dns3.p08.nsone.net
• dns4.p08.nsone.net
• ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
• ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
• ns-421.awsdns-52.com
• ns-520.awsdns-01.net