GITHUB . COM {
}
Detected CMS Systems:
- Wordpress (2 occurrences)
Title:
[css-sizing-3] max-content contribution of replaced only-aspect-ratio elements might be improvable · Issue #4218 · w3c/csswg-drafts
Description:
We appear to have no interop on this case: <!DOCTYPE html> <div style="width: max-content; border: thick double;"> <svg style="float:left;" viewBox="0 0 200 100"></svg> Chrome gives it 0x0, Firefox gives it ICB width and then ratio heigh...
Website Age:
17 years and 8 months (reg. 2007-10-09).
Matching Content Categories {📚}
- Careers
- Science
- Personal Finance
Content Management System {📝}
What CMS is github.com built with?
Github.com is built with WORDPRESS.
Traffic Estimate {📈}
What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?
🚀🌠 Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month
Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 14,040,467 visitors per month in the current month.
check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush
How Does Github.com Make Money? {💸}
Subscription Packages {💳}
We've located a dedicated page on github.com that might include details about subscription plans or recurring payments. We identified it based on the word pricing in one of its internal links. Below, you'll find additional estimates for its monthly recurring revenues.How Much Does Github.com Make? {💰}
Subscription Packages {💳}
Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($).
They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 7,006,023 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $29,425,298.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $353,103,574.
Wordpress Themes and Plugins {🎨}
What WordPress theme does this site use?
It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.
What WordPress plugins does this website use?
It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.
Keywords {🔍}
fantasai, csssizing, maxcontent, contribution, replaced, elements, improvable, added, sign, onlyaspectratio, closed, projects, issue, commented, cssmeetingbot, navigation, pull, requests, actions, security, tabatkins, svg, width, ratio, height, behavior, current, work, mentioned, jensimmons, agenda, edits, onlyar, removed, accepted, csswg, resolution, testcase, wpt, github, type, milestone, footer, skip, content, menu, product, solutions, resources, open,
Topics {✒️}
[css-sizing-3] max-content contribution [css-grid-1][css-sizing-3] aspect-ratio completed fantasai removed max-content css working group csswg resolution aspect-ratio elements full irc log comment metadata assignees type projects projects milestone ratio height ar elements improvable thick double milestone relationships icb width github 300px width width 300px skip jump sign replaced interop case border float left viewbox= 0x0 firefox spec suggest ff' behavior arbitrary boxes size agree agreed resolved firefox' testcase wpt free join conversation account
Payment Methods {📊}
- Braintree
Questions {❓}
- Already have an account?
Schema {🗺️}
DiscussionForumPosting:
context:https://schema.org
headline:[css-sizing-3] max-content contribution of replaced only-aspect-ratio elements might be improvable
articleBody:We appear to have no interop on this case:
```html
<!DOCTYPE html>
<div style="width: max-content; border: thick double;">
<svg style="float:left;" viewBox="0 0 200 100"></svg>
```
Chrome gives it 0x0, Firefox gives it ICB width and then ratio height. The spec says 300px width and ratio height.
We suggest to go with FF's behavior, as this seems more useful than 0, and less arbitrary than 300px.
author:
url:https://github.com/tabatkins
type:Person
name:tabatkins
datePublished:2019-08-19T18:17:32.000Z
interactionStatistic:
type:InteractionCounter
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:3
url:https://github.com/4218/csswg-drafts/issues/4218
context:https://schema.org
headline:[css-sizing-3] max-content contribution of replaced only-aspect-ratio elements might be improvable
articleBody:We appear to have no interop on this case:
```html
<!DOCTYPE html>
<div style="width: max-content; border: thick double;">
<svg style="float:left;" viewBox="0 0 200 100"></svg>
```
Chrome gives it 0x0, Firefox gives it ICB width and then ratio height. The spec says 300px width and ratio height.
We suggest to go with FF's behavior, as this seems more useful than 0, and less arbitrary than 300px.
author:
url:https://github.com/tabatkins
type:Person
name:tabatkins
datePublished:2019-08-19T18:17:32.000Z
interactionStatistic:
type:InteractionCounter
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:3
url:https://github.com/4218/csswg-drafts/issues/4218
Person:
url:https://github.com/tabatkins
name:tabatkins
url:https://github.com/tabatkins
name:tabatkins
InteractionCounter:
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:3
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:3
External Links {🔗}(2)
Analytics and Tracking {📊}
- Site Verification - Google
Libraries {📚}
- Clipboard.js
- D3.js
- Lodash
Emails and Hosting {✉️}
Mail Servers:
- aspmx.l.google.com
- alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
Name Servers:
- dns1.p08.nsone.net
- dns2.p08.nsone.net
- dns3.p08.nsone.net
- dns4.p08.nsone.net
- ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
- ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
- ns-421.awsdns-52.com
- ns-520.awsdns-01.net