GITHUB . COM {}

Matching Content Categories {📚}

• Dating & Relationships
• DIY & Home Improvement
• Home & Garden

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is github.com built with?

Github.com is powered by WORDPRESS.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?

🚀🌠 Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,653,780 visitors per month in the current month.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Github.com Make Money? {💸}

Subscription Packages {💳}

How Much Does Github.com Make? {💰}

Subscription Packages {💳}

Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($). They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 5,316,107 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $22,327,651.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $267,931,808.

Wordpress Themes and Plugins {🎨}

What WordPress theme does this site use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.

What WordPress plugins does this website use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.

Keywords {🔍}

space, sum, cssgrid, flex, ratios, fantasai, tracks, added, sign, distribute, issue, closed, flexible, distributing, weights, projects, loirooriol, track, equally, distributed, case, algorithm, weight, handle, current, agenda, cssmeetingbot, navigation, pull, requests, actions, security, httpsdraftscsswgorgcssgridalgospanningflexitems, sizes, items, step, sizing, fraction, doesnt, nonflexible, share, special, behavior, factors, intrinsic, commented, distribution, target, revision, remove,

Topics {✒️}

/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/5a43ab7210d08c9a012a7697eb39a382f8133079 personal information [css-grid] completed loirooriol mentioned [css-grid-1] distribution css working group [css-grid] fantasai added flexible sizing function flexible sizing functions full irc log comment metadata assignees due date relationships type projects distributing space equally csswg resolution items flexible tracks flexible tracks flex factors agenda+ space distribution flex ratios flex fraction distributing space distributed equally distributing intrinsic … distribute space distributed space leftover space increase sizes slightly ambiguous make sense vague amendment bit harder current structure request review current remove accept change intrinsic sizes real algorithm weighting algorithm case space previous step track receives weight divided csswg assigns weights //drafts special behavior commit

Payment Methods {📊}

• Braintree

Questions {❓}

• Already have an account?
• The CSS Working Group just discussed How to distribute space using flex ratios when the sum is 0?
• What if the sum of ratios is 0?
• [css-grid] How to distribute space using flex ratios when the sum is 0?

Schema {🗺️}

DiscussionForumPosting:
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:[css-grid] How to distribute space using flex ratios when the sum is 0?
      articleBody:From https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#algo-spanning-flex-items, > Increase sizes to accommodate spanning items crossing flexible tracks: Next, repeat the previous step instead considering [...] all items that do span a track with a flexible sizing function while [...] > - distributing space to such tracks according to the ratios of their flexible sizing functions rather than distributing space equally This "according to the ratios" seems slightly ambiguous to me. What if the sum of ratios is 0? Then each track should get a 0/0 fraction of the distributed space, doesn't make sense. I guess in this case space is distributed equally, like for non-flexible tracks. I think it would be more clear if the algorithm said: - Non-flexible tracks have a weight of 0. - Flexible tracks have a weight of their flex fraction. - When distributing space among some tracks, sum their weights. If this is is 0, the space is distributed equally. Otherwise, each track receives a share of its weight divided by the sum of weights. This should be in the real algorithm, https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#extra-space, not as some kind of vague amendment in https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#algo-spanning-flex-items Alternatively, not sure if something special should happen when the sum of weights is less than 1, akin to > `<flex>` values between 0fr and 1fr have a somewhat special behavior: when the sum of the flex factors is less than 1, they will take up less than 100% of the leftover space.
      author:
         url:https://github.com/Loirooriol
         type:Person
         name:Loirooriol
      datePublished:2019-03-01T15:29:59.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:2
      url:https://github.com/3694/csswg-drafts/issues/3694
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:[css-grid] How to distribute space using flex ratios when the sum is 0?
      articleBody:From https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#algo-spanning-flex-items, > Increase sizes to accommodate spanning items crossing flexible tracks: Next, repeat the previous step instead considering [...] all items that do span a track with a flexible sizing function while [...] > - distributing space to such tracks according to the ratios of their flexible sizing functions rather than distributing space equally This "according to the ratios" seems slightly ambiguous to me. What if the sum of ratios is 0? Then each track should get a 0/0 fraction of the distributed space, doesn't make sense. I guess in this case space is distributed equally, like for non-flexible tracks. I think it would be more clear if the algorithm said: - Non-flexible tracks have a weight of 0. - Flexible tracks have a weight of their flex fraction. - When distributing space among some tracks, sum their weights. If this is is 0, the space is distributed equally. Otherwise, each track receives a share of its weight divided by the sum of weights. This should be in the real algorithm, https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#extra-space, not as some kind of vague amendment in https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#algo-spanning-flex-items Alternatively, not sure if something special should happen when the sum of weights is less than 1, akin to > `<flex>` values between 0fr and 1fr have a somewhat special behavior: when the sum of the flex factors is less than 1, they will take up less than 100% of the leftover space.
      author:
         url:https://github.com/Loirooriol
         type:Person
         name:Loirooriol
      datePublished:2019-03-01T15:29:59.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:2
      url:https://github.com/3694/csswg-drafts/issues/3694
Person:
      url:https://github.com/Loirooriol
      name:Loirooriol
      url:https://github.com/Loirooriol
      name:Loirooriol
InteractionCounter:
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:2
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:2

External Links {🔗}(4)

• How much profit is https://github.blog making per month?
• What's the financial outcome of https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#algo-spanning-flex-items?
• See how much https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#extra-space makes per month
• How much does https://www.githubstatus.com/ generate monthly?

Analytics and Tracking {📊}

• Site Verification - Google

Libraries {📚}

• Clipboard.js
• D3.js
• Lodash

Emails and Hosting {✉️}

Mail Servers:

• aspmx.l.google.com
• alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

Name Servers:

• dns1.p08.nsone.net
• dns2.p08.nsone.net
• dns3.p08.nsone.net
• dns4.p08.nsone.net
• ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
• ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
• ns-421.awsdns-52.com
• ns-520.awsdns-01.net