GITHUB . COM {}

Matching Content Categories {📚}

• Graphic Design
• Environment
• Technology & Computing

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is github.com built with?

Github.com is built with WORDPRESS.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?

🚀🌠 Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,000,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Github.com Make Money? {💸}

Subscription Packages {💳}

How Much Does Github.com Make? {💰}

Subscription Packages {💳}

Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($). They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 4,989,889 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $20,957,532.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $251,490,385.

Wordpress Themes and Plugins {🎨}

What WordPress theme does this site use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.

What WordPress plugins does this website use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.

Keywords {🔍}

grid, baseline, track, change, matspalmgren, item, row, container, items, commented, javifernandez, content, div, fantasai, dont, unintentional, issue, sense, remove, alignment, sign, cssgrid, synthesize, tracks, style, added, makes, condition, projects, closed, doesnt, csswg, resolution, testcase, border, adiv, author, synthesizing, empty, edits, contributor, step, area, scheme, cssmeetingbot, navigation, pull, requests, actions, security,

Topics {✒️}

css working group content-based alignment scheme javifernandez edits contributor csswg meeting discussed unintentional change full irc log grid container baselines abstract concept outlined type projects general text box' comment metadata assignees grid container box unintentional change baseline set parallel content/block/margin grid container baseline single grid item projects milestone csswg resolution synthesizing makes sense grid content grid lines author intentionally grid container' grid container change made advanced scheme removed inline-grid grid-area grid order unintentional inline-block separate concept baseline alignment alignment-baseline grid item empty grid 1px solid bit inconsistent falling back area intersecting stated originally relevant axis area intersects feel strongly intrinsically sized definite size interpreted reading milestone relationships

Payment Methods {📊}

• Braintree

Questions {❓}

• @jensimmons @rachelandrew @LeaVerou What would you expect in @MatsPalmgren example (baseline aligning a grid that contains only a single grid item in 2nd row)?
• Already have an account?
• I'd like clarification if the change to ignore all items except those in the first(last) track was intentional or not?
• The CSS Working Group just discussed Unintentional change to grid container baseline?
• [css-grid] Unintentional change to grid container baseline?

Schema {🗺️}

DiscussionForumPosting:
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:[css-grid] Unintentional change to grid container baseline?
      articleBody:There was [a change](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/15fe334dc4aeea8dbf1a26497fc7b65cb626fd05#diff-d55daa50088af378e4c59fea0f0d01b8) made in the last bullet point under [§10.6. Grid Container Baselines](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#grid-baselines) that looks unintentional. It used to say that the first item should be used, but now it doesn't. It appears that part of this edit was not discussed in the [CSSWG meeting](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0000.html), nor mentioned in the resolution, AFAICT, so it looks like an unintentional change to me. It appears that the discussion is mostly about which box (content/block/margin) to use to synthesize the baseline, not that items in other tracks should be ignored. That edit was for issue #373 BTW. Testcase: ```html <style> .grid { display: inline-grid; grid: 100px 100px 100px / 10px; border: 1px solid; } .item { background: lime; } </style> A<div class="grid"> <div class="item">B</div> </div> A<div class="grid"> <div class="item" style="grid-area:2/1">B</div> </div> ``` Firefox takes the item in the 2nd row into account while Chrome doesn't so we now disagree on this testcase. I'd like clarification if the change to ignore all items except those in the first(last) track was intentional or not?
      author:
         url:https://github.com/MatsPalmgren
         type:Person
         name:MatsPalmgren
      datePublished:2019-02-11T21:27:50.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:7
      url:https://github.com/3645/csswg-drafts/issues/3645
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:[css-grid] Unintentional change to grid container baseline?
      articleBody:There was [a change](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/15fe334dc4aeea8dbf1a26497fc7b65cb626fd05#diff-d55daa50088af378e4c59fea0f0d01b8) made in the last bullet point under [§10.6. Grid Container Baselines](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#grid-baselines) that looks unintentional. It used to say that the first item should be used, but now it doesn't. It appears that part of this edit was not discussed in the [CSSWG meeting](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0000.html), nor mentioned in the resolution, AFAICT, so it looks like an unintentional change to me. It appears that the discussion is mostly about which box (content/block/margin) to use to synthesize the baseline, not that items in other tracks should be ignored. That edit was for issue #373 BTW. Testcase: ```html <style> .grid { display: inline-grid; grid: 100px 100px 100px / 10px; border: 1px solid; } .item { background: lime; } </style> A<div class="grid"> <div class="item">B</div> </div> A<div class="grid"> <div class="item" style="grid-area:2/1">B</div> </div> ``` Firefox takes the item in the 2nd row into account while Chrome doesn't so we now disagree on this testcase. I'd like clarification if the change to ignore all items except those in the first(last) track was intentional or not?
      author:
         url:https://github.com/MatsPalmgren
         type:Person
         name:MatsPalmgren
      datePublished:2019-02-11T21:27:50.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:7
      url:https://github.com/3645/csswg-drafts/issues/3645
Person:
      url:https://github.com/MatsPalmgren
      name:MatsPalmgren
      url:https://github.com/MatsPalmgren
      name:MatsPalmgren
InteractionCounter:
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:7
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:7

External Links {🔗}(6)

• How much profit does https://github.blog make?
• How much profit is https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#grid-baselines making per month?
• How much does https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0000.html pull in?
• What's https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#example-ff8d888d's gross income?
• How much profit does https://www.w3.org/TR/css-inline-3/#alignment-baseline-property make?
• https://www.githubstatus.com/ income

Analytics and Tracking {📊}

• Site Verification - Google

Libraries {📚}

• Clipboard.js
• D3.js
• Lodash

Emails and Hosting {✉️}

Mail Servers:

• aspmx.l.google.com
• alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

Name Servers:

• dns1.p08.nsone.net
• dns2.p08.nsone.net
• dns3.p08.nsone.net
• dns4.p08.nsone.net
• ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
• ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
• ns-421.awsdns-52.com
• ns-520.awsdns-01.net