GITHUB . COM {}

Matching Content Categories {📚}

• Family & Parenting
• Video & Online Content
• Dating & Relationships

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is github.com built with?

Github.com employs WORDPRESS.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?

🚀🌠 Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,000,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Github.com Make Money? {💸}

Subscription Packages {💳}

How Much Does Github.com Make? {💰}

Subscription Packages {💳}

Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($). They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 4,989,889 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $20,957,532.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $251,490,385.

Wordpress Themes and Plugins {🎨}

What WordPress theme does this site use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.

What WordPress plugins does this website use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.

Keywords {🔍}

selectors, commented, behavior, matches, errorrecovery, selector, browsers, normal, work, cyberap, exeboss, fantasai, sign, tabatkins, current, error, invalid, write, supports, selenit, match, projects, issue, minor, added, rule, edits, support, react, contributor, ewilligers, cssmeetingbot, webcompat, nthchild, unsupported, recovery, gibberish, navigation, menu, open, code, pull, requests, actions, security, syntax, ignore, feature, bar, test,

Topics {✒️}

exe-boss edits contributor top-level comma tokens css working group fantasai added unknown pseudo‑classes bad selectors behavior personal information [selectors] remember earlier speculation vendor prefix exemption full irc log web-compat implications web-compat problem web-compat risk preserved raw text comment metadata assignees multi‑argument form hover part work cover selector check accept selector lists css extensions error-recovery behavior fantasai changed pseudo-classes single‑argument form avoid developers' confusion type projects complex selector invalidates normal selectors ignore unknown arguments link inside projects milestone current spec error recovery selectors extensively custom selectors [selectors-4] rename single argument single selector syntax error selector separately worthwhile idea spec-wise official syntax newer feature bloated stylesheet default transformed hamburger icon proven wrong great explanation great feature

Payment Methods {📊}

• Braintree

Questions {❓}

• Already have an account?
• Do we still think this is a worthwhile idea to pursue?
• How can this be solved with @supports (even if extended to test for selectors)?
• Shouldn't this belong to @supports rule?
• You mean like #3082, except without the vendor prefix exemption?

Schema {🗺️}

DiscussionForumPosting:
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:[selectors] Let :is() have better error-recovery behavior than normal Selectors
      articleBody:This isn't captured in the current spec, but I remember earlier speculation that we could use `:matches()` as a way to get around the bad Selectors behavior of "a syntax error in one complex selector invalidates the whole sequence" that we're stuck with. Do we still think this is a worthwhile idea to pursue? Spec-wise, what this would mean is defining the official syntax as `:matches( <any-value> )`, then split the result on top-level comma tokens, then attempt to parse each item as a `<complex-selector>`, and just ignore any invalid ones. (If all of them are invalid, the selector matches nothing.) Then, if you're concerned about using a newer feature, you can just write your selectors like: ``` :matches( .foo || .bar, td.foo:first-child ) { /* styles for the bar cell */ ``` An unfortunately, but relatively minor, tax for getting better error-recovery behavior. (If we *do* end up renaming it to `:is()`, it's even more minor.)
      author:
         url:https://github.com/tabatkins
         type:Person
         name:tabatkins
      datePublished:2018-10-29T19:03:57.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:29
      url:https://github.com/3264/csswg-drafts/issues/3264
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:[selectors] Let :is() have better error-recovery behavior than normal Selectors
      articleBody:This isn't captured in the current spec, but I remember earlier speculation that we could use `:matches()` as a way to get around the bad Selectors behavior of "a syntax error in one complex selector invalidates the whole sequence" that we're stuck with. Do we still think this is a worthwhile idea to pursue? Spec-wise, what this would mean is defining the official syntax as `:matches( <any-value> )`, then split the result on top-level comma tokens, then attempt to parse each item as a `<complex-selector>`, and just ignore any invalid ones. (If all of them are invalid, the selector matches nothing.) Then, if you're concerned about using a newer feature, you can just write your selectors like: ``` :matches( .foo || .bar, td.foo:first-child ) { /* styles for the bar cell */ ``` An unfortunately, but relatively minor, tax for getting better error-recovery behavior. (If we *do* end up renaming it to `:is()`, it's even more minor.)
      author:
         url:https://github.com/tabatkins
         type:Person
         name:tabatkins
      datePublished:2018-10-29T19:03:57.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:29
      url:https://github.com/3264/csswg-drafts/issues/3264
Person:
      url:https://github.com/tabatkins
      name:tabatkins
      url:https://github.com/tabatkins
      name:tabatkins
InteractionCounter:
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:29
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:29

External Links {🔗}(3)

• Explore the financials of https://github.blog
• Earnings of https://drafts.csswg.org/css-extensions/#custom-selectors
• Check the income stats for https://www.githubstatus.com/

Analytics and Tracking {📊}

• Site Verification - Google

Libraries {📚}

• Clipboard.js
• D3.js
• Lodash

Emails and Hosting {✉️}

Mail Servers:

• aspmx.l.google.com
• alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

Name Servers:

• dns1.p08.nsone.net
• dns2.p08.nsone.net
• dns3.p08.nsone.net
• dns4.p08.nsone.net
• ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
• ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
• ns-421.awsdns-52.com
• ns-520.awsdns-01.net