GITHUB . COM {}

Matching Content Categories {📚}

• Video & Online Content
• Social Networks
• Family & Parenting

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is github.com built with?

Github.com operates using WORDPRESS.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?

🚀🌠 Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,000,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Github.com Make Money? {💸}

Subscription Packages {💳}

How Much Does Github.com Make? {💰}

Subscription Packages {💳}

Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($). They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 4,989,889 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $20,957,532.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $251,490,385.

Wordpress Themes and Plugins {🎨}

What WordPress theme does this site use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.

What WordPress plugins does this website use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.

Keywords {🔍}

tabatkins, commented, selectors, webkit, valid, member, upsuper, issue, firefox, sign, behavior, pseudoelements, added, author, myakura, projects, browsers, quirk, compat, spec, things, navigation, issues, pull, requests, actions, security, pseudos, closed, parse, time, selector, list, apparently, whatwgcompat, webplatformtestswpt, ahead, current, work, frivoal, fix, contributor, hard, prefix, change, blinkwebkit, stop, recognizing, great, doubt,

Topics {✒️}

update webkit-pseudo-element test arbitrary webkit-prefixed pseudo-class wpt tests webkit-derived browsers personal information [selectors] whatwg/compat issue create compat problems selectors spec webkit- pseudo-elements webkit- pseudo-elements change blink/webkit comment metadata assignees hard places make webkit- parsing quirk webkit-specific things type projects added text projects milestone upsuper mentioned compat issues pseudo-elements resolution / edits pseudo-classes webkit- pseudos webkit- prefix added spec make shim selectors 4 parse time compatibility appendix stop recognizing page loads websites broken webcompat directly vh unit past prefix muddy present milestone relationships firefox implementing firefox feels firefox due apparently begun github browsers considered valid selector list webkit webkit blink

Payment Methods {📊}

• Braintree

Questions {❓}

• Already have an account?
• Is it hard to limit the list to the currently exposed ::-webkit- pseudo-elements?

Schema {🗺️}

DiscussionForumPosting:
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:[selectors] Specify the "all ::-webkit-* pseudos are valid" behavior
      articleBody:For a while, WebKit-derived browsers have had a quirk where *all* `::-webkit-*` pseudo-elements are considered valid at parse time (and thus won't invalidate a selector list if they appear in only one selector). This has apparently begun to create compat problems for Firefox (see <https://github.com/whatwg/compat/issues/103>), so they're adding that behavior themselves. This behavior is being tracked in WPT tests in <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/12673>. We should go ahead and inline that into the Selectors spec, probably in a compatibility appendix.
      author:
         url:https://github.com/tabatkins
         type:Person
         name:tabatkins
      datePublished:2018-08-24T17:54:32.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:15
      url:https://github.com/3051/csswg-drafts/issues/3051
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:[selectors] Specify the "all ::-webkit-* pseudos are valid" behavior
      articleBody:For a while, WebKit-derived browsers have had a quirk where *all* `::-webkit-*` pseudo-elements are considered valid at parse time (and thus won't invalidate a selector list if they appear in only one selector). This has apparently begun to create compat problems for Firefox (see <https://github.com/whatwg/compat/issues/103>), so they're adding that behavior themselves. This behavior is being tracked in WPT tests in <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/12673>. We should go ahead and inline that into the Selectors spec, probably in a compatibility appendix.
      author:
         url:https://github.com/tabatkins
         type:Person
         name:tabatkins
      datePublished:2018-08-24T17:54:32.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:15
      url:https://github.com/3051/csswg-drafts/issues/3051
Person:
      url:https://github.com/tabatkins
      name:tabatkins
      url:https://github.com/tabatkins
      name:tabatkins
InteractionCounter:
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:15
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:15

External Links {🔗}(3)

• Get to know what's the income of https://github.blog
• Income figures for https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors-4/#compat
• What's the monthly money flow for https://www.githubstatus.com/?

Analytics and Tracking {📊}

• Site Verification - Google

Libraries {📚}

• Clipboard.js
• D3.js
• Lodash

Emails and Hosting {✉️}

Mail Servers:

• aspmx.l.google.com
• alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

Name Servers:

• dns1.p08.nsone.net
• dns2.p08.nsone.net
• dns3.p08.nsone.net
• dns4.p08.nsone.net
• ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
• ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
• ns-421.awsdns-52.com
• ns-520.awsdns-01.net