
GITHUB . COM {
}
Detected CMS Systems:
- Wordpress (2 occurrences)
Title:
[selectors] decide on :blank ยท Issue #1967 ยท w3c/csswg-drafts
Description:
Is :whitespace-only really that bad? It's a more niche case so longer names seem acceptable then? Or just decide on :blank and remove the issue marker, allowing implementations to remove the pr...
Website Age:
17 years and 8 months (reg. 2007-10-09).
Matching Content Categories {๐}
- Dating & Relationships
- Social Networks
- Technology & Computing
Content Management System {๐}
What CMS is github.com built with?
Github.com operates using WORDPRESS.
Traffic Estimate {๐}
What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?
๐๐ Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month
Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,000,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.
check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush
How Does Github.com Make Money? {๐ธ}
Subscription Packages {๐ณ}
We've located a dedicated page on github.com that might include details about subscription plans or recurring payments. We identified it based on the word pricing in one of its internal links. Below, you'll find additional estimates for its monthly recurring revenues.How Much Does Github.com Make? {๐ฐ}
Subscription Packages {๐ณ}
Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($).
They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 4,989,889 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $20,957,532.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $251,490,385.
Wordpress Themes and Plugins {๐จ}
What WordPress theme does this site use?
It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.
What WordPress plugins does this website use?
It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.
Keywords {๐}
commented, elements, blank, fantasai, empty, cssmeetingbot, match, selectors, decide, issue, annevk, agenda, react, sign, whitespace, white, space, discussed, pre, projects, jschoi, css, github, collaborator, discussion, member, whileloopa, navigation, open, pull, requests, actions, security, whitespaceonly, niche, remove, implementations, edited, edits, wsonly, remaining, unambiguous, added, current, work, working, group, full, irc, log,
Topics {โ๏ธ}
adding agenda+ back js-choi edits [selectors] add selector css working group remaining semantically unambiguous considers โwhite spaceโ www-style archives full irc log ignores white space totally lost track comment metadata assignees whileloopa edits type projects issue marker csswg resolution css projects milestone white space discussed decide github repository working group discussion ๐ react longer names prefixed variant word phrase tedious bikeshedding typed โambiguousโ main question functional notation breaking spaces thin spaces match elements descendant elements path forward milestone relationships decide niche case allowing implementations web-compat cover whitespace discussion github blank ๏ฟฝunambiguousโ discussed web niche implementations whitespace ๐ react
Payment Methods {๐}
- Braintree
Questions {โ}
- Already have an account?
- Is :whitespace-only really that bad?
- Is there a particular reason why :ws-only would be unacceptable?
Schema {๐บ๏ธ}
DiscussionForumPosting:
context:https://schema.org
headline:[selectors] decide on :blank
articleBody:Is `:whitespace-only` really that bad? It's a more niche case so longer names seem acceptable then? Or just decide on `:blank` and remove the issue marker, allowing implementations to remove the prefixed variant (if still feasible).
author:
url:https://github.com/annevk
type:Person
name:annevk
datePublished:2017-11-10T11:02:16.000Z
interactionStatistic:
type:InteractionCounter
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:56
url:https://github.com/1967/csswg-drafts/issues/1967
context:https://schema.org
headline:[selectors] decide on :blank
articleBody:Is `:whitespace-only` really that bad? It's a more niche case so longer names seem acceptable then? Or just decide on `:blank` and remove the issue marker, allowing implementations to remove the prefixed variant (if still feasible).
author:
url:https://github.com/annevk
type:Person
name:annevk
datePublished:2017-11-10T11:02:16.000Z
interactionStatistic:
type:InteractionCounter
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:56
url:https://github.com/1967/csswg-drafts/issues/1967
Person:
url:https://github.com/annevk
name:annevk
url:https://github.com/annevk
name:annevk
InteractionCounter:
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:56
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:56
External Links {๐}(2)
Analytics and Tracking {๐}
- Site Verification - Google
Libraries {๐}
- Clipboard.js
- D3.js
- Lodash
Emails and Hosting {โ๏ธ}
Mail Servers:
- aspmx.l.google.com
- alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
Name Servers:
- dns1.p08.nsone.net
- dns2.p08.nsone.net
- dns3.p08.nsone.net
- dns4.p08.nsone.net
- ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
- ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
- ns-421.awsdns-52.com
- ns-520.awsdns-01.net