GITHUB . COM {}

Matching Content Categories {📚}

• Social Networks
• Crafts
• Cryptocurrency

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is github.com built with?

Github.com is powered by WORDPRESS.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?

🚀🌠 Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,000,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Github.com Make Money? {💸}

Subscription Packages {💳}

How Much Does Github.com Make? {💰}

Subscription Packages {💳}

Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($). They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 4,989,889 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $20,957,532.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $251,490,385.

Wordpress Themes and Plugins {🎨}

What WordPress theme does this site use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.

What WordPress plugins does this website use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.

Keywords {🔍}

flowroot, block, runin, blockify, inlineblock, closed, commented, sign, cssdisplay, issue, inline, flow, fantasai, added, tabatkins, agenda, projects, loirooriol, type, member, frivoal, astearns, cssmeetingbot, navigation, pull, requests, actions, security, display, resolutions, resolved, blockifies, make, sense, change, formatting, context, consistency, current, work, full, table, accepted, csswg, resolution, tracked, doc, github, milestone, footer,

Topics {✒️}

personal information [css-display] css display transformations tabatkins closed outer display type csswg resolution tracked inline flow-root blockifies full irc log special tree munging formatting context comment metadata assignees hypothetical ruby-root flow-root blockifies type projects inline flow-root discussed blockifying 'run [css block flow-root frivoal mentioned flow-root' blockify projects milestone make sense 'flow-root' flow-root flow-root' flow root updated table inline-block block flow syntactically equivalent backwards compatibility expect blockifications affect getcomputedstyle strong opinion verify making issue working group milestone relationships prefer consistency github f2f resolutions 'block' block blockify f2f consistency resolutions sign 'run run skip

Payment Methods {📊}

• Braintree

Questions {❓}

• Already have an account?
• [css-display] Should 'run-in flow-root' blockify to 'block' or 'flow-root'?

Schema {🗺️}

DiscussionForumPosting:
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:[css-display] Should 'run-in flow-root' blockify to 'block' or 'flow-root'?
      articleBody:I was drawing a diagram to understand the CSS Display transformations after the F2F resolutions and how a hypothetical `ruby-root` could fit in there. [](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7477678/29187009-96422abe-7e0e-11e7-8bdf-1c4dbee2481f.png) I noticed that it's not clear how `run-in flow-root` should blockify, and you didn't discuss this in the F2F. It was resolved that `inline flow-root` blockifies to `block flow` because `inline flow-root` is syntactically equivalent to `inline-block`, and `inline-block` must blockify to `block` because of backwards compatibility. A `run-in flow-root` is basically an inline-block with some special tree munging. So it could make sense to let `run-in flow-root` be consistent with `inline-block` and also blockify to `block flow`. The other possibility would be to keep it simple and only change the outer display type, i.e. blockify to `block flow-root`. In practice, the difference should not matter much because I expect blockifications to trigger becoming a formatting context. But it will affect `getComputedStyle`, of course. I don't have a strong opinion, but maybe I prefer consistency with `inline flow-root`.
      author:
         url:https://github.com/Loirooriol
         type:Person
         name:Loirooriol
      datePublished:2017-08-10T19:25:15.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:5
      url:https://github.com/1715/csswg-drafts/issues/1715
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:[css-display] Should 'run-in flow-root' blockify to 'block' or 'flow-root'?
      articleBody:I was drawing a diagram to understand the CSS Display transformations after the F2F resolutions and how a hypothetical `ruby-root` could fit in there. [](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7477678/29187009-96422abe-7e0e-11e7-8bdf-1c4dbee2481f.png) I noticed that it's not clear how `run-in flow-root` should blockify, and you didn't discuss this in the F2F. It was resolved that `inline flow-root` blockifies to `block flow` because `inline flow-root` is syntactically equivalent to `inline-block`, and `inline-block` must blockify to `block` because of backwards compatibility. A `run-in flow-root` is basically an inline-block with some special tree munging. So it could make sense to let `run-in flow-root` be consistent with `inline-block` and also blockify to `block flow`. The other possibility would be to keep it simple and only change the outer display type, i.e. blockify to `block flow-root`. In practice, the difference should not matter much because I expect blockifications to trigger becoming a formatting context. But it will affect `getComputedStyle`, of course. I don't have a strong opinion, but maybe I prefer consistency with `inline flow-root`.
      author:
         url:https://github.com/Loirooriol
         type:Person
         name:Loirooriol
      datePublished:2017-08-10T19:25:15.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:5
      url:https://github.com/1715/csswg-drafts/issues/1715
Person:
      url:https://github.com/Loirooriol
      name:Loirooriol
      url:https://github.com/Loirooriol
      name:Loirooriol
InteractionCounter:
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:5
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:5

External Links {🔗}(4)

• What is the monthly revenue of https://github.blog?
• Check the income stats for https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7477678/29187009-96422abe-7e0e-11e7-8bdf-1c4dbee2481f.png
• How much profit does https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7477678/38340146-2b961fee-3872-11e8-82b5-f2d893eba466.png generate?
• How much profit is https://www.githubstatus.com/ making per month?

Analytics and Tracking {📊}

• Site Verification - Google

Libraries {📚}

• Clipboard.js
• D3.js
• Lodash

Emails and Hosting {✉️}

Mail Servers:

• aspmx.l.google.com
• alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

Name Servers:

• dns1.p08.nsone.net
• dns2.p08.nsone.net
• dns3.p08.nsone.net
• dns4.p08.nsone.net
• ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
• ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
• ns-421.awsdns-52.com
• ns-520.awsdns-01.net