
GITHUB . COM {
}
Detected CMS Systems:
- Wordpress (2 occurrences)
Title:
TOML as an RFC? Β· Issue #870 Β· toml-lang/toml
Description:
Have you considered publishing v1.0.0 as an RFC? I can see two immediate benefits: The format would be easier to use / reference from other RFCs and by other standards efforts. You could get application/toml registered1 -- done If you
Website Age:
17 years and 8 months (reg. 2007-10-09).
Matching Content Categories {π}
- Video & Online Content
- Careers
- Education
Content Management System {π}
What CMS is github.com built with?
Github.com relies on WORDPRESS.
Traffic Estimate {π}
What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?
ππ Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month
Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,000,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.
check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush
How Does Github.com Make Money? {πΈ}
Subscription Packages {π³}
We've located a dedicated page on github.com that might include details about subscription plans or recurring payments. We identified it based on the word pricing in one of its internal links. Below, you'll find additional estimates for its monthly recurring revenues.How Much Does Github.com Make? {π°}
Subscription Packages {π³}
Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($).
They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 4,989,889 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $20,957,532.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $251,490,385.
Wordpress Themes and Plugins {π¨}
What WordPress theme does this site use?
It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.
What WordPress plugins does this website use?
It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.
Keywords {π}
commented, rfc, toml, paulehoffman, eksortso, mnot, process, contributor, sign, happy, pradyunsg, mentioned, react, mcarans, issue, standards, christiansi, hidden, offtopic, navigation, open, issues, pull, requests, actions, security, considered, publishing, format, rfcs, dont, full, task, paperwork, author, agree, project, release, github, type, projects, milestone, footer, skip, content, menu, product, solutions, resources, source,
Topics {βοΈ}
application/toml registered1 personal information toml comment metadata assignees process issues considered publishing v1 full standards process toml v1 toml project primary author type projects standards efforts standards publication independent stream comparatively lightweight full format written dozens language grammer authors figuring main contributors bit player toml' make sense toml 1 foreseeable future future-proof control characters mechanical part markdown stuff millisecond precision projects milestone milestone relationships github rfc process v1 process format project rfc skip jump sign benefits easier / reference rfcs happy footnotes registration require sort
Payment Methods {π}
- Braintree
Questions {β}
- 0 as an RFC?
- Already have an account?
- Is there an immediate demand for an RFC to be filed now, or can we take the time to propose one with TOML's new features?
- TOML as an RFC?
Schema {πΊοΈ}
DiscussionForumPosting:
context:https://schema.org
headline:TOML as an RFC?
articleBody:Have you considered publishing v1.0.0 as an [RFC](https://rfc-editor.org/)?
I can see two immediate benefits:
- [ ] The format would be easier to use / reference from other RFCs and by other standards efforts.
- [x] You could get `application/toml` [registered](https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xhtml)[^1] -- [done](https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/toml)
If you'd consider it, I'd be happy to help - you don't have to go through the full standards process, the independent stream would be very appropriate for this and comparatively lightweight.
[^1]: You don't need an RFC for the full format to get the registration -- but it does require some sort of standards publication.
author:
url:https://github.com/mnot
type:Person
name:mnot
datePublished:2022-01-24T04:48:31.000Z
interactionStatistic:
type:InteractionCounter
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:33
url:https://github.com/870/toml/issues/870
context:https://schema.org
headline:TOML as an RFC?
articleBody:Have you considered publishing v1.0.0 as an [RFC](https://rfc-editor.org/)?
I can see two immediate benefits:
- [ ] The format would be easier to use / reference from other RFCs and by other standards efforts.
- [x] You could get `application/toml` [registered](https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xhtml)[^1] -- [done](https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/toml)
If you'd consider it, I'd be happy to help - you don't have to go through the full standards process, the independent stream would be very appropriate for this and comparatively lightweight.
[^1]: You don't need an RFC for the full format to get the registration -- but it does require some sort of standards publication.
author:
url:https://github.com/mnot
type:Person
name:mnot
datePublished:2022-01-24T04:48:31.000Z
interactionStatistic:
type:InteractionCounter
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:33
url:https://github.com/870/toml/issues/870
Person:
url:https://github.com/mnot
name:mnot
url:https://github.com/mnot
name:mnot
InteractionCounter:
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:33
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:33
External Links {π}(5)
- How much revenue does https://github.blog bring in?
- How much money does https://rfc-editor.org/ generate?
- How much revenue does https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xhtml bring in?
- How much revenue does https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/toml generate?
- Learn how profitable https://www.githubstatus.com/ is on a monthly basis
Analytics and Tracking {π}
- Site Verification - Google
Libraries {π}
- Clipboard.js
- D3.js
- Lodash
Emails and Hosting {βοΈ}
Mail Servers:
- aspmx.l.google.com
- alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
Name Servers:
- dns1.p08.nsone.net
- dns2.p08.nsone.net
- dns3.p08.nsone.net
- dns4.p08.nsone.net
- ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
- ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
- ns-421.awsdns-52.com
- ns-520.awsdns-01.net