Here's how GITHUB.COM makes money* and how much!

*Please read our disclaimer before using our estimates.
Loading...

GITHUB . COM {}

Detected CMS Systems:

  1. Analyzed Page
  2. Matching Content Categories
  3. CMS
  4. Monthly Traffic Estimate
  5. How Does Github.com Make Money
  6. How Much Does Github.com Make
  7. Wordpress Themes And Plugins
  8. Keywords
  9. Topics
  10. Payment Methods
  11. Questions
  12. Schema
  13. External Links
  14. Analytics And Tracking
  15. Libraries
  16. Hosting Providers

We are analyzing https://github.com/squidfunk/mkdocs-material/issues/2492.

Title:
Inline code style for admonition seems odd due to override Β· Issue #2492 Β· squidfunk/mkdocs-material
Description:
I've read the [contribution guidelines][1] and agree with them I've found a bug and checked that ... ... the problem doesn't occur with the default MkDocs template ... the problem is no...
Website Age:
17 years and 8 months (reg. 2007-10-09).

Matching Content Categories {πŸ“š}

  • Graphic Design
  • Technology & Computing
  • Mobile Technology & AI

Content Management System {πŸ“}

What CMS is github.com built with?


Github.com is based on WORDPRESS.

Traffic Estimate {πŸ“ˆ}

What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?

πŸš€πŸŒ  Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,000,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Github.com Make Money? {πŸ’Έ}


Subscription Packages {πŸ’³}

We've located a dedicated page on github.com that might include details about subscription plans or recurring payments. We identified it based on the word pricing in one of its internal links. Below, you'll find additional estimates for its monthly recurring revenues.

How Much Does Github.com Make? {πŸ’°}


Subscription Packages {πŸ’³}

Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($). They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 4,989,889 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $20,957,532.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $251,490,385.

Wordpress Themes and Plugins {🎨}

What WordPress theme does this site use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.

What WordPress plugins does this website use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.

Keywords {πŸ”}

squidfunk, code, override, issue, backgroundcolor, inline, color, currentcolor, alpha, open, sign, requests, admonition, problem, commented, removed, mixblendmode, resolved, projects, style, closed, polarathene, ive, initial, concern, owner, react, navigation, issues, pull, actions, security, odd, due, description, template, css, dont, background, applied, contrast, wouldnt, behavior, comparison, project, information, block, current, difference, colorburn,

Topics {βœ’οΈ}

mkdocs-material/src/assets/stylesheets/main/extensions/markdown/_admonition project demo site inline code blocks inline code syntax inline code block current upstream style default mkdocs template pymdownx-inline method open projects closed issues code block colors improvement resolved issue table-based solution long time ago comment metadata assignees mix-blend-mode referenced css rules projects milestone color-burn color override removed current override open code { code blend modes problem description overrides removed //squidfunk override visually color-burn overrides applied opaque colors odd due [contribution guidelines][1] border-radius box-shadow 2nd message light bg line numbers users prefer longer true milestone relationships background-color // omit background alpha values alpha approach difference color luminosity color multiply color admonition titles

Payment Methods {πŸ“Š}

  • Braintree

Questions {❓}

  • Already have an account?
  • How is the override visually better?
  • I don't quite get the reasoning for this override?
  • If the concern is with contrast, wouldn't it be better to instead use alpha?

Schema {πŸ—ΊοΈ}

DiscussionForumPosting:
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:Inline code style for admonition seems odd due to override
      articleBody:- [x] I've read the [contribution guidelines][1] and agree with them __I've found a bug and checked that ...__ - [x] ... the problem doesn't occur with the default MkDocs template - [x] ... the problem is not in any of my customizations (CSS, JS, template) - [x] ... the documentation does not mention anything about my problem - [x] ... there are no open or closed issues that are related to my problem ## Description I don't quite get the reasoning for this override?: https://github.com/squidfunk/mkdocs-material/blob/414ffe14cd880eabb234bd6d7ce884a62e0ca7d3/src/assets/stylesheets/main/extensions/markdown/_admonition.scss#L154-L163 How is the override visually better? If it was a concern for the user they might as well at that point just not use the `inline code syntax`? If the concern is with contrast, wouldn't it be better to instead use alpha? ### Expected behavior **EDIT:** See the comparison images below in the 2nd message. <details> <summary>original examples</summary> Any of the following: 1. Restore bg-color: ![Screenshot_20210326_191218](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5098581/112590140-3496b600-8e67-11eb-83bc-3dbae7c6ff58.png) 2. Full restore: ![Screenshot_20210326_191806](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5098581/112590847-59d7f400-8e68-11eb-8257-94e2164109b4.png) 3. Change bg-color to brighter shade with opacity (`#ffffffbf`): ![Screenshot_20210326_192119](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5098581/112591040-9d326280-8e68-11eb-8dc7-dade7737aa63.png) 4. Change bg-color to darker shade with opacity (`#3a3a3a30`): ![Screenshot_20210326_193014](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5098581/112591776-c56e9100-8e69-11eb-80b2-acd5c680e71b.png) 5. Change bg-color to better match admonition colour (`#d7d7d7ad` with CSS [`mix-blend-mode: multiply`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/mix-blend-mode)): ![Screenshot_20210326_193301](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5098581/112592112-4e85c800-8e6a-11eb-8575-6aba3eed57a8.png) 6. or with `mix-blend-mode: luminosity`: ![Screenshot_20210326_193734](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5098581/112592406-c9e77980-8e6a-11eb-9f20-d6848b9c0686.png) Personally 3 or 6 look quite nice. </details> ### Actual behavior ![Screenshot_20210326_191133](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5098581/112590096-2052b900-8e67-11eb-9e32-62fce2bb5d4a.png) ### Package versions / Project configuration / System information Active release used for project demo site (if modified to use an inline code block in admonition title): https://squidfunk.github.io/mkdocs-material/reference/admonitions
      author:
         url:https://github.com/polarathene
         type:Person
         name:polarathene
      datePublished:2021-03-26T07:00:02.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:4
      url:https://github.com/2492/mkdocs-material/issues/2492
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:Inline code style for admonition seems odd due to override
      articleBody:- [x] I've read the [contribution guidelines][1] and agree with them __I've found a bug and checked that ...__ - [x] ... the problem doesn't occur with the default MkDocs template - [x] ... the problem is not in any of my customizations (CSS, JS, template) - [x] ... the documentation does not mention anything about my problem - [x] ... there are no open or closed issues that are related to my problem ## Description I don't quite get the reasoning for this override?: https://github.com/squidfunk/mkdocs-material/blob/414ffe14cd880eabb234bd6d7ce884a62e0ca7d3/src/assets/stylesheets/main/extensions/markdown/_admonition.scss#L154-L163 How is the override visually better? If it was a concern for the user they might as well at that point just not use the `inline code syntax`? If the concern is with contrast, wouldn't it be better to instead use alpha? ### Expected behavior **EDIT:** See the comparison images below in the 2nd message. <details> <summary>original examples</summary> Any of the following: 1. Restore bg-color: ![Screenshot_20210326_191218](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5098581/112590140-3496b600-8e67-11eb-83bc-3dbae7c6ff58.png) 2. Full restore: ![Screenshot_20210326_191806](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5098581/112590847-59d7f400-8e68-11eb-8257-94e2164109b4.png) 3. Change bg-color to brighter shade with opacity (`#ffffffbf`): ![Screenshot_20210326_192119](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5098581/112591040-9d326280-8e68-11eb-8dc7-dade7737aa63.png) 4. Change bg-color to darker shade with opacity (`#3a3a3a30`): ![Screenshot_20210326_193014](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5098581/112591776-c56e9100-8e69-11eb-80b2-acd5c680e71b.png) 5. Change bg-color to better match admonition colour (`#d7d7d7ad` with CSS [`mix-blend-mode: multiply`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/mix-blend-mode)): ![Screenshot_20210326_193301](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5098581/112592112-4e85c800-8e6a-11eb-8575-6aba3eed57a8.png) 6. or with `mix-blend-mode: luminosity`: ![Screenshot_20210326_193734](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5098581/112592406-c9e77980-8e6a-11eb-9f20-d6848b9c0686.png) Personally 3 or 6 look quite nice. </details> ### Actual behavior ![Screenshot_20210326_191133](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5098581/112590096-2052b900-8e67-11eb-9e32-62fce2bb5d4a.png) ### Package versions / Project configuration / System information Active release used for project demo site (if modified to use an inline code block in admonition title): https://squidfunk.github.io/mkdocs-material/reference/admonitions
      author:
         url:https://github.com/polarathene
         type:Person
         name:polarathene
      datePublished:2021-03-26T07:00:02.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:4
      url:https://github.com/2492/mkdocs-material/issues/2492
Person:
      url:https://github.com/polarathene
      name:polarathene
      url:https://github.com/polarathene
      name:polarathene
InteractionCounter:
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:4
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:4

External Links {πŸ”—}(19)

Analytics and Tracking {πŸ“Š}

  • Site Verification - Google

Libraries {πŸ“š}

  • Clipboard.js
  • D3.js
  • Lodash

Emails and Hosting {βœ‰οΈ}

Mail Servers:

  • aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

Name Servers:

  • dns1.p08.nsone.net
  • dns2.p08.nsone.net
  • dns3.p08.nsone.net
  • dns4.p08.nsone.net
  • ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
  • ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
  • ns-421.awsdns-52.com
  • ns-520.awsdns-01.net
8.95s.