GITHUB . COM {}

Matching Content Categories {📚}

• Social Networks
• Education
• TV

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is github.com built with?

Github.com operates using WORDPRESS.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?

🚀🌠 Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,653,974 visitors per month in the current month.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Github.com Make Money? {💸}

Subscription Packages {💳}

How Much Does Github.com Make? {💰}

Subscription Packages {💳}

Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($). They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 5,316,204 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $22,328,057.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $267,936,687.

Wordpress Themes and Plugins {🎨}

What WordPress theme does this site use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.

What WordPress plugins does this website use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.

Keywords {🔍}

warnings, sequence, warning, pytestwarns, pytestwarnsnone, commented, bashtage, empty, error, raised, code, issue, block, nicoddemus, zachd, pytest, context, ensure, raise, docs, change, feature, tests, meaning, sign, projects, users, deprecation, catchwarnings, pytestdoesnotwarn, comment, type, proposal, accept, pytestraises, member, issues, pull, manager, inside, raising, added, mentioned, clarify, doesnt, design, record, make, react, feels,

Topics {✒️}

context manager pytest context code special-case alternative meaning pull request consequent test bugs support user learning type projects error checking based projects milestone 7 context managers pytest-based method feels helpful bashtage edits code produces reading code terms issues code inside feature type empty sequence dynamic check projects design issue special cases improve pytest sequence interpretation common mistake current suggestion apply directly work properly worth reaching proposal proposal gather opinions dynamic pattern upstream dependencies undocumented iirc strongly opposed forward-compatible bit painful test runner clear scope 100% complete relationships earlier error users assumed [prerelease] pytest revert pytest changing pytest clarify difference runtime scenarios runtime yep

Payment Methods {📊}

• Braintree

Questions {❓}

• Already have an account?
• What happens now with an empty sequence?
• Raises(), though I think that's a typo?
• Warns()?

Schema {🗺️}

DiscussionForumPosting:
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:Context manager to ensure no warnings are issued
      articleBody:Follow up to https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/9386, starting this thread to discuss how to support the use case of "inside the given with block, no warning should be generated". Seems most users assumed this idiom: ```python with pytest.warns(None): ... ``` Would ensure that the code inside the `with` block would **not issue any warning**, raising an error if it did. However that was never the case, and `pytest.warns(None)` would do nothing (warning or no warning generated). To warn users about this common mistake, we added a deprecation warning when `None` was passed to `pytest.warns` (https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/pull/8677). When `7.0.0rc1` was released, some issues were reported about this: https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/9402, #9386. Users would like a way to ensure a block of code does not raise **any** warning, something which we never really supported. Our current suggestion is to use `warnings.catch_warnings()`, followed by `simplefilter("error")`: ```python with warnings.catch_warnings(): warnings.simplefilter("error") ... ``` However as mentioned in https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/9402, this does not apply directly if you have a dynamic check: ```python warn_typ = FutureWarning if input == "nc" else None with pytest.warns(warn_typ): ... ``` So far we have the following proposals: 1. Keep things as is, improving the docs and suggesting `catch_warnings` (https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/9002). 2. Introduce a new context manager, `pytest.does_not_warn()` (https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/9386#issuecomment-988800080). 3. Change `pytest.warns(None)` to mean that no warning should be raised (https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/9402#issuecomment-990777522). I think this is worth reaching a consensus before the `7.0.0` release is out.
      author:
         url:https://github.com/nicoddemus
         type:Person
         name:nicoddemus
      datePublished:2021-12-10T10:50:01.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:42
      url:https://github.com/9404/pytest/issues/9404
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:Context manager to ensure no warnings are issued
      articleBody:Follow up to https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/9386, starting this thread to discuss how to support the use case of "inside the given with block, no warning should be generated". Seems most users assumed this idiom: ```python with pytest.warns(None): ... ``` Would ensure that the code inside the `with` block would **not issue any warning**, raising an error if it did. However that was never the case, and `pytest.warns(None)` would do nothing (warning or no warning generated). To warn users about this common mistake, we added a deprecation warning when `None` was passed to `pytest.warns` (https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/pull/8677). When `7.0.0rc1` was released, some issues were reported about this: https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/9402, #9386. Users would like a way to ensure a block of code does not raise **any** warning, something which we never really supported. Our current suggestion is to use `warnings.catch_warnings()`, followed by `simplefilter("error")`: ```python with warnings.catch_warnings(): warnings.simplefilter("error") ... ``` However as mentioned in https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/9402, this does not apply directly if you have a dynamic check: ```python warn_typ = FutureWarning if input == "nc" else None with pytest.warns(warn_typ): ... ``` So far we have the following proposals: 1. Keep things as is, improving the docs and suggesting `catch_warnings` (https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/9002). 2. Introduce a new context manager, `pytest.does_not_warn()` (https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/9386#issuecomment-988800080). 3. Change `pytest.warns(None)` to mean that no warning should be raised (https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/9402#issuecomment-990777522). I think this is worth reaching a consensus before the `7.0.0` release is out.
      author:
         url:https://github.com/nicoddemus
         type:Person
         name:nicoddemus
      datePublished:2021-12-10T10:50:01.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:42
      url:https://github.com/9404/pytest/issues/9404
Person:
      url:https://github.com/nicoddemus
      name:nicoddemus
      url:https://github.com/nicoddemus
      name:nicoddemus
InteractionCounter:
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:42
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:42

External Links {🔗}(5)

• What's the financial outcome of https://github.blog?
• What's the monthly income of https://python.hotexamples.com/examples/numpy.testing/-/assert_no_warnings/python-assert_no_warnings-function-examples.html?
• https://docs.pytest.org/en/6.2.x/reference.html#pytest-warns's total income per month
• What are the total earnings of https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0020/?
• What is the monthly revenue of https://www.githubstatus.com/?

Analytics and Tracking {📊}

• Site Verification - Google

Libraries {📚}

• Clipboard.js
• D3.js
• Lodash

Emails and Hosting {✉️}

Mail Servers:

• aspmx.l.google.com
• alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

Name Servers:

• dns1.p08.nsone.net
• dns2.p08.nsone.net
• dns3.p08.nsone.net
• dns4.p08.nsone.net
• ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
• ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
• ns-421.awsdns-52.com
• ns-520.awsdns-01.net