Here's how GITHUB.COM makes money* and how much!

*Please read our disclaimer before using our estimates.
Loading...

GITHUB . COM {}

Detected CMS Systems:

  1. Analyzed Page
  2. Matching Content Categories
  3. CMS
  4. Monthly Traffic Estimate
  5. How Does Github.com Make Money
  6. How Much Does Github.com Make
  7. Wordpress Themes And Plugins
  8. Keywords
  9. Topics
  10. Payment Methods
  11. Questions
  12. Schema
  13. External Links
  14. Analytics And Tracking
  15. Libraries
  16. Hosting Providers

We are analyzing https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/449.

Title:
better indicate that there were xpassed test results in a test run · Issue #449 · pytest-dev/pytest
Description:
Originally reported by: Jurko Gospodnetić (BitBucket: jurko, GitHub: jurko) This is a usability related enhancement suggestion. When running tests what I really want to know first is: Did anything unexpected happen? which includes both: ...
Website Age:
17 years and 8 months (reg. 2007-10-09).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

  • Education
  • Transportation
  • Technology & Computing

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is github.com built with?


Github.com employs WORDPRESS.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?

🚀🌠 Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,653,974 visitors per month in the current month.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Github.com Make Money? {💸}


Subscription Packages {💳}

We've located a dedicated page on github.com that might include details about subscription plans or recurring payments. We identified it based on the word pricing in one of its internal links. Below, you'll find additional estimates for its monthly recurring revenues.

How Much Does Github.com Make? {💰}


Subscription Packages {💳}

Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($). They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 5,316,204 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $22,328,057.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $267,936,687.

Wordpress Themes and Plugins {🎨}

What WordPress theme does this site use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.

What WordPress plugins does this website use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.

Keywords {🔍}

xpassed, test, tests, blueyed, results, issue, summary, pytestbot, added, merge, verified, sign, projects, jurko, github, enhancement, running, line, color, result, type, yellow, run, closed, bitbucket, marked, xfail, lot, possibly, commented, contributor, features, terminal, navigation, code, pull, requests, actions, security, gospodnetić, related, suggestion, started, option, final, greenred, indicators, letter, read, red,

Topics {✒️}

comment metadata assignees 13baab7 blueyed mentioned xpassed test result tests marked xfail test failures/errors features branch type assigned labels type exit code xpassed test results blueyed closed blueyed added type projects projects milestone test results test summary summary line xfail marker xpassed test summary displays jurko gospodnetić unexpected happen capital letter expected xfailed lower letter projects flow & concentration simple 0=success disabled assertions made configurable floris bruynooghe pycon sprin xfails/xfails real regression api change good fit milestone relationships personal information green/red red/green red/blue x' option started running tests marked lot harder run possibly results features suggestion

Payment Methods {📊}

  • Braintree

Questions {❓}

  • Already have an account?
  • Did anything unexpected happen?
  • Whether any tests marked xfail suddenly started passing?
  • Whether there were any test failures/errors?

Schema {🗺️}

DiscussionForumPosting:
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:better indicate that there were xpassed test results in a test run
      articleBody:Originally reported by: **Jurko Gospodnetić (BitBucket: [jurko](http://bitbucket.org/jurko), GitHub: [jurko](http://github.com/jurko))** --- This is a usability related enhancement suggestion. When running tests what I really want to know first is: - Did anything unexpected happen? which includes both: - Whether there were any test failures/errors? - Whether any tests marked `xfail` suddenly started passing? The first I can get easily at first glance - either by running the tests with the `-x` option or by checking the final summary line color (green/red). The latter is a problem though because in order to find whether there were any `xpassed` test I have to concentrate a lot harder and either: - Scan the test summary for `xpassed` test result indicators (capital letter `X`) which can be difficult to discern from expected `xfailed` (lower letter `x`) results. - Read the final colored summary line to see if any `xpassed` test results occurred. - Run the tests with the '-r X' option and read whether the summary displays any `xpassed` test results. One of my projects has a lot of tests marked `xfail` and it started to bug me that I often waste a lot of time and interrupt my flow & concentration by having to check the test results in detail just to see if there were any `xpassed` test results. My suggestion would be to: - Use a different color (e.g. blue?) if you would otherwise color it green by at least one `xpassed` test result was encountered. - Use an exit code other that a simple 0=success in such cases. - Possibly color individual `error` (`E`), `failed` (`F`) & `xpassed` (`X`) test result indicators red or red/blue. You might not want to use the new `xpassed` result related coloring when running with disabled assertions (`-O`) and you displayed a warning about this possibly causing failing tests to be marked as passed, e.g. when running using an older Python interpreter version. The whole enhancement could possibly be made configurable as well. Hope this helps. Best regards, Jurko Gospodnetić --- - Bitbucket: https://bitbucket.org/pytest-dev/pytest/issue/449
      author:
         url:https://github.com/pytestbot
         type:Person
         name:pytestbot
      datePublished:2014-02-08T11:06:14.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:3
      url:https://github.com/449/pytest/issues/449
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:better indicate that there were xpassed test results in a test run
      articleBody:Originally reported by: **Jurko Gospodnetić (BitBucket: [jurko](http://bitbucket.org/jurko), GitHub: [jurko](http://github.com/jurko))** --- This is a usability related enhancement suggestion. When running tests what I really want to know first is: - Did anything unexpected happen? which includes both: - Whether there were any test failures/errors? - Whether any tests marked `xfail` suddenly started passing? The first I can get easily at first glance - either by running the tests with the `-x` option or by checking the final summary line color (green/red). The latter is a problem though because in order to find whether there were any `xpassed` test I have to concentrate a lot harder and either: - Scan the test summary for `xpassed` test result indicators (capital letter `X`) which can be difficult to discern from expected `xfailed` (lower letter `x`) results. - Read the final colored summary line to see if any `xpassed` test results occurred. - Run the tests with the '-r X' option and read whether the summary displays any `xpassed` test results. One of my projects has a lot of tests marked `xfail` and it started to bug me that I often waste a lot of time and interrupt my flow & concentration by having to check the test results in detail just to see if there were any `xpassed` test results. My suggestion would be to: - Use a different color (e.g. blue?) if you would otherwise color it green by at least one `xpassed` test result was encountered. - Use an exit code other that a simple 0=success in such cases. - Possibly color individual `error` (`E`), `failed` (`F`) & `xpassed` (`X`) test result indicators red or red/blue. You might not want to use the new `xpassed` result related coloring when running with disabled assertions (`-O`) and you displayed a warning about this possibly causing failing tests to be marked as passed, e.g. when running using an older Python interpreter version. The whole enhancement could possibly be made configurable as well. Hope this helps. Best regards, Jurko Gospodnetić --- - Bitbucket: https://bitbucket.org/pytest-dev/pytest/issue/449
      author:
         url:https://github.com/pytestbot
         type:Person
         name:pytestbot
      datePublished:2014-02-08T11:06:14.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:3
      url:https://github.com/449/pytest/issues/449
Person:
      url:https://github.com/pytestbot
      name:pytestbot
      url:https://github.com/pytestbot
      name:pytestbot
InteractionCounter:
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:3
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:3

External Links {🔗}(5)

Analytics and Tracking {📊}

  • Site Verification - Google

Libraries {📚}

  • Clipboard.js
  • D3.js
  • Lodash

Emails and Hosting {✉️}

Mail Servers:

  • aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

Name Servers:

  • dns1.p08.nsone.net
  • dns2.p08.nsone.net
  • dns3.p08.nsone.net
  • dns4.p08.nsone.net
  • ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
  • ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
  • ns-421.awsdns-52.com
  • ns-520.awsdns-01.net
9.7s.