
GITHUB . COM {
}
Detected CMS Systems:
- Wordpress (2 occurrences)
Title:
pytest should use the `inspect.signature` algorithm to determine fixtures to use Β· Issue #2267 Β· pytest-dev/pytest
Description:
pytest 3.0.6 on python 3.6, Arch Linux (distro packages). Currently, pytest follows the entire __wrapped__ chain and uses low-level code introspection to determine the signature of the test function, and thus the fixtures to use (https:/...
Website Age:
17 years and 9 months (reg. 2007-10-09).
Matching Content Categories {π}
- Technology & Computing
- Mobile Technology & AI
- Education
Content Management System {π}
What CMS is github.com built with?
Github.com is based on WORDPRESS.
Traffic Estimate {π}
What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?
ππ Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month
Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,666,346 visitors per month in the current month.
check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush
How Does Github.com Make Money? {πΈ}
Subscription Packages {π³}
We've located a dedicated page on github.com that might include details about subscription plans or recurring payments. We identified it based on the word pricing in one of its internal links. Below, you'll find additional estimates for its monthly recurring revenues.How Much Does Github.com Make? {π°}
Subscription Packages {π³}
Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($).
They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 5,347,483 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $22,459,429.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $269,513,148.
Wordpress Themes and Plugins {π¨}
What WordPress theme does this site use?
It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.
What WordPress plugins does this website use?
It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.
Keywords {π}
pytest, code, commented, nicoddemus, type, ceridwen, inspectsignature, fixtures, member, sign, algorithm, anntzer, python, signature, test, import, def, flub, features, branch, funcsigs, dont, pull, projects, determine, issue, packages, wrapped, chain, function, case, return, work, mentioned, contributor, dependency, ronnypfannschmidt, navigation, pytestdev, issues, requests, actions, security, closed, lowlevel, preferable, attribute, decorator, time, image,
Topics {βοΈ}
/pytest-dev/pytest/blob/master/_pytest/compat open-source implementation low-level code introspection activity anntzer mentioned personal information pytest wrapper code calls low-level stuff pytest-dev refactoring internal improvements licensing issues comment metadata assignees pull request assigned labels type signature code introduces type projects features branch type entire __wrapped__ chain projects milestone installing python packages recent python versions org/pypi/funcsigs code type import reason pytest image_comparison decorator code base def test_foo def tester code objects features branch image files raylu mentioned test function http_timeout test pytest __wrapped__ chain dependencies low distro packages packages controlled matplotlib' arch linux follow_wrapped=false wrapped function argument 'x' plotting commands simplify mpl small chance general tendency define functions corner cases
Payment Methods {π}
- Braintree
Questions {β}
- Already have an account?
- Can I get a yes or no about whether you would accept a patch using funcsigs, either as an import or by vendoring?
- Would you be up to creating a pull request with the required changes?
- Org/pypi/funcsigs) be acceptable?
Schema {πΊοΈ}
DiscussionForumPosting:
context:https://schema.org
headline:pytest should use the `inspect.signature` algorithm to determine fixtures to use
articleBody:pytest 3.0.6 on python 3.6, Arch Linux (distro packages).
Currently, pytest follows the entire `__wrapped__` chain and uses low-level code introspection to determine the signature of the test function, and thus the fixtures to use (https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/blob/master/_pytest/compat.py#L84). It would be preferable if it used the algorithm of `inspect.signature` (follow the `__wrapped__` chain until either reaching an object with a `__signature__` attribute (use the attribute in that case), or the bottom of the chain) instead.
This would allow things such as
```
import functools
import inspect
import pytest
def decorator(func):
@functools.wraps(func)
def tester(x):
assert func()
tester.__signature__ = inspect.signature(tester, follow_wrapped=False)
print(inspect.signature(tester)) # prints "(x)"
return tester
@pytest.mark.parametrize("x", [1])
@decorator
def test_1(*args):
return args
```
(i.e., where the wrapper code calls the wrapped function but does the asserts on its return value) to work (currently, this fails at collection time with `ValueError: <function test_1 at 0x7fbb804841e0> uses no argument 'x'`).
An example use case of this pattern is matplotlib's image comparison test suite, which looks like
```
@image_comparison([image_filenames])
def test_foo():
# plotting commands
```
which runs some plotting commands and then compares the results to the image files specified by the `image_comparison` decorator.
author:
url:https://github.com/anntzer
type:Person
name:anntzer
datePublished:2017-02-19T23:53:15.000Z
interactionStatistic:
type:InteractionCounter
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:8
url:https://github.com/2267/pytest/issues/2267
context:https://schema.org
headline:pytest should use the `inspect.signature` algorithm to determine fixtures to use
articleBody:pytest 3.0.6 on python 3.6, Arch Linux (distro packages).
Currently, pytest follows the entire `__wrapped__` chain and uses low-level code introspection to determine the signature of the test function, and thus the fixtures to use (https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/blob/master/_pytest/compat.py#L84). It would be preferable if it used the algorithm of `inspect.signature` (follow the `__wrapped__` chain until either reaching an object with a `__signature__` attribute (use the attribute in that case), or the bottom of the chain) instead.
This would allow things such as
```
import functools
import inspect
import pytest
def decorator(func):
@functools.wraps(func)
def tester(x):
assert func()
tester.__signature__ = inspect.signature(tester, follow_wrapped=False)
print(inspect.signature(tester)) # prints "(x)"
return tester
@pytest.mark.parametrize("x", [1])
@decorator
def test_1(*args):
return args
```
(i.e., where the wrapper code calls the wrapped function but does the asserts on its return value) to work (currently, this fails at collection time with `ValueError: <function test_1 at 0x7fbb804841e0> uses no argument 'x'`).
An example use case of this pattern is matplotlib's image comparison test suite, which looks like
```
@image_comparison([image_filenames])
def test_foo():
# plotting commands
```
which runs some plotting commands and then compares the results to the image files specified by the `image_comparison` decorator.
author:
url:https://github.com/anntzer
type:Person
name:anntzer
datePublished:2017-02-19T23:53:15.000Z
interactionStatistic:
type:InteractionCounter
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:8
url:https://github.com/2267/pytest/issues/2267
Person:
url:https://github.com/anntzer
name:anntzer
url:https://github.com/anntzer
name:anntzer
InteractionCounter:
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:8
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:8
External Links {π}(3)
Analytics and Tracking {π}
- Site Verification - Google
Libraries {π}
- Clipboard.js
- D3.js
- GSAP
- Lodash
Emails and Hosting {βοΈ}
Mail Servers:
- aspmx.l.google.com
- alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
Name Servers:
- dns1.p08.nsone.net
- dns2.p08.nsone.net
- dns3.p08.nsone.net
- dns4.p08.nsone.net
- ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
- ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
- ns-421.awsdns-52.com
- ns-520.awsdns-01.net