GITHUB . COM {}

Matching Content Categories {📚}

• Technology & Computing
• Games
• Social Networks

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is github.com built with?

Github.com utilizes WORDPRESS.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?

🚀🌠 Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,000,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Github.com Make Money? {💸}

Subscription Packages {💳}

How Much Does Github.com Make? {💰}

Subscription Packages {💳}

Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($). They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 4,989,889 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $20,957,532.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $251,490,385.

Wordpress Themes and Plugins {🎨}

What WordPress theme does this site use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.

What WordPress plugins does this website use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.

Keywords {🔍}

setuptools, adamjstewart, package, dependencies, install, pip, build, commented, jaraco, packages, manager, source, spack, distutilscore, wheels, versions, author, react, issue, python, appdirs, import, dont, vendor, svenevs, sign, version, add, member, require, reason, prebuilt, general, compilers, dependency, tgamblin, things, builds, rely, java, projects, bootstrap, packaging, back, hard, correct, edited, edits, setup, developers,

Topics {✒️}

browsing related issues adamjstewart edits author setuptools monkey-patches distutils comment metadata assignees long-term strategy user installs python create reproducible builds package openjdk/icedtea site-packages directory discussion pushes spack os distro folks spack package manager package manager kind native package manager pre-import setuptools make minimal assumptions enable source builds pre-built version pre-built versions python packages depend setuptools import setup setuptools affect efforts pkg-config depends labels projects projects milestone require arbitrary dependencies declare build dependencies setuptools build recipe hard setuptools import package manager install core import setup adamjstewart mentioned people pip install setuptools build dependencies main issue python package pip install setuptools pkg-config thing spack supporting virtualenv spack traverses binary installs package manager enable dropping setuptools package require setuptools latest version mirror builds adamjstewart build setuptools

Payment Methods {📊}

• Braintree

Questions {❓}

• @jaraco: how do the plans for setuptools affect efforts by OS distro folks to create reproducible builds (podcast) of packages?
• AKA frown upon ye who pip install setuptools?
• Already have an account?
• Can you use pip to install the dependencies from wheels (which don't require setuptools to install)?
• Do you happen to know if there is a "safe" way of configuring pip to not install / touch anything underneath the site-packages directory?
• If you need a java compiler to build a java compiler, how do you install the first java compiler?
• Is there a reason your package manager can't have pre-built versions of these packages available or vendor them itself (into the setuptools build recipe)?
• Is there a reason your package manager can't have pre-built versions of these packages available or vendor them itself (into the setuptools build recipe)?
• Is this correct, or should pip be used to install setuptools as the preferred approach on systems that have it available in both their native package manager and they received pip out of the box?
• Is this correct?
• Or can your package manager install the wheels?
• Unfortunately, a package manager that requires another package manager kind of defeats the purpose, don't you think?
• Toml for setuptools?
• Toml is the thing spack should ultimately be checking for setuptools?

Schema {🗺️}

DiscussionForumPosting:
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:How to bootstrap setuptools from source
      articleBody:Hi, I'm a developer for the [Spack](https://spack.io/) package manager. We've had a [setuptools package](https://github.com/LLNL/spack/blob/develop/var/spack/repos/builtin/packages/py-setuptools/package.py) that has worked fine for a while now, and the vast majority of our Python packages depend on it. However, I went to update to the latest version of `setuptools` and noticed that it now depends on `six`, `packaging`, and `appdirs`. Unfortunately all 3 of these packages also depend on `setuptools`. `six` and `packaging` can fall back on `distutils.core` if necessary, but the `setup.py` for `appdirs` has a hard `setuptools` import. It seems to me like it is no longer possible to build setuptools from source. Is this correct??
      author:
         url:https://github.com/adamjstewart
         type:Person
         name:adamjstewart
      datePublished:2017-02-20T20:21:10.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:73
      url:https://github.com/980/setuptools/issues/980
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:How to bootstrap setuptools from source
      articleBody:Hi, I'm a developer for the [Spack](https://spack.io/) package manager. We've had a [setuptools package](https://github.com/LLNL/spack/blob/develop/var/spack/repos/builtin/packages/py-setuptools/package.py) that has worked fine for a while now, and the vast majority of our Python packages depend on it. However, I went to update to the latest version of `setuptools` and noticed that it now depends on `six`, `packaging`, and `appdirs`. Unfortunately all 3 of these packages also depend on `setuptools`. `six` and `packaging` can fall back on `distutils.core` if necessary, but the `setup.py` for `appdirs` has a hard `setuptools` import. It seems to me like it is no longer possible to build setuptools from source. Is this correct??
      author:
         url:https://github.com/adamjstewart
         type:Person
         name:adamjstewart
      datePublished:2017-02-20T20:21:10.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:73
      url:https://github.com/980/setuptools/issues/980
Person:
      url:https://github.com/adamjstewart
      name:adamjstewart
      url:https://github.com/adamjstewart
      name:adamjstewart
InteractionCounter:
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:73
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:73

External Links {🔗}(6)

• See how much https://github.blog makes per month
• How much money does https://spack.io/ make?
• How much does https://sourceforge.net/p/pyparsing/patches/10/ pull in?
• Revenue of https://reproducible-builds.org
• What is the monthly revenue of https://changelog.com/podcast/237?
• What's the monthly money flow for https://www.githubstatus.com/?

Analytics and Tracking {📊}

• Site Verification - Google

Libraries {📚}

• Clipboard.js
• D3.js
• Lodash

Emails and Hosting {✉️}

Mail Servers:

• aspmx.l.google.com
• alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
• alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

Name Servers:

• dns1.p08.nsone.net
• dns2.p08.nsone.net
• dns3.p08.nsone.net
• dns4.p08.nsone.net
• ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
• ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
• ns-421.awsdns-52.com
• ns-520.awsdns-01.net