Here's how GITHUB.COM makes money* and how much!

*Please read our disclaimer before using our estimates.
Loading...

GITHUB . COM {}

Detected CMS Systems:

  1. Analyzed Page
  2. Matching Content Categories
  3. CMS
  4. Monthly Traffic Estimate
  5. How Does Github.com Make Money
  6. How Much Does Github.com Make
  7. Wordpress Themes And Plugins
  8. Keywords
  9. Topics
  10. Payment Methods
  11. Questions
  12. Schema
  13. External Links
  14. Analytics And Tracking
  15. Libraries
  16. Hosting Providers

We are analyzing https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/849.

Title:
Since setuptools 28.5.0, a "global-exclude .pyc" no longer matches .pyc files Β· Issue #849 Β· pypa/setuptools
Description:
Since commit bb45468, if a project's MANIFEST.in contains global-exclude .py[co], the archive generated with python setup.py sdist will still contain all .pyc / .pyo files. The test below shows...
Website Age:
17 years and 8 months (reg. 2007-10-09).

Matching Content Categories {πŸ“š}

  • Technology & Computing
  • Mobile Technology & AI
  • DIY & Home Improvement

Content Management System {πŸ“}

What CMS is github.com built with?


Github.com operates using WORDPRESS.

Traffic Estimate {πŸ“ˆ}

What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?

πŸš€πŸŒ  Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,000,003 visitors per month in the current month.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Github.com Make Money? {πŸ’Έ}


Subscription Packages {πŸ’³}

We've located a dedicated page on github.com that might include details about subscription plans or recurring payments. We identified it based on the word pricing in one of its internal links. Below, you'll find additional estimates for its monthly recurring revenues.

How Much Does Github.com Make? {πŸ’°}


Subscription Packages {πŸ’³}

Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($). They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 4,989,880 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $20,957,498.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $251,489,970.

Wordpress Themes and Plugins {🎨}

What WordPress theme does this site use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.

What WordPress plugins does this website use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.

Keywords {πŸ”}

globalexclude, jaraco, issue, behaviour, rbarrois, mxmoth, setuptools, pyc, mentioned, globbing, sign, projects, commit, manifestin, commented, fix, barpy, pypa, pull, files, pyco, bug, change, changelog, filelistfiles, btxt, restore, added, references, simple, navigation, code, requests, actions, security, longer, matches, closed, test, patterns, anchoring, explicitly, wildcards, assert, filelist, apy, recursiveinclude, member, unit, agree,

Topics {βœ’οΈ}

diff --cc setuptools/tests/test_manifest 23aba91 mx-moth mentioned 980c2c5 mx-moth mentioned mx-moth added timheap/global-exclude-glob jaraco edits member 3e6669a jaraco mentioned /setuptools/tests/test_manifest global-exclude bar previous implementation looked explicitly include wildcards comment metadata assignees jaraco closed recursive-include explicitly globbing global-include properly anchoring patterns labels projects projects milestone global-exclude 'global-exclude global-exclude code exclude bar fix unit tests globbing issue longer matches archive generated python setup pyo files line worked forces users unintentional regression bash shell proper bugfix simply documenting assigned labels milestone relationships personal information assert file_list unit test surprisingly foo_bar github version changelog simple work longstanding bug commit bb45468 behaviour behaves

Payment Methods {πŸ“Š}

  • Braintree

Questions {❓}

  • @timheap How difficult would it be to restore this expectation?
  • Already have an account?

Schema {πŸ—ΊοΈ}

DiscussionForumPosting:
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:Since setuptools 28.5.0, a "global-exclude .pyc" no longer matches .pyc files
      articleBody:Since commit bb45468d27615c2ce9f9c9757a367c44d6ee80d2, if a project's MANIFEST.in contains ``global-exclude .py[co]``, the archive generated with ``python setup.py sdist`` will still contain all ``.pyc`` / ``.pyo`` files. The test below shows that this line worked in setuptools 28.4.0, and broke in setuptools 28.5.0. I'm not sure whether this can be considered a bug: the previous implementation looked up patterns without any anchoring, whereas the new one forces users to explicitly include wildcards in their ``MANIFEST.in``. However, I think this change should have been mentioned in the version Changelog. ```patch diff --cc setuptools/tests/test_manifest.py index 6360270,ef4beda..0000000 --- a/setuptools/tests/test_manifest.py +++ b/setuptools/tests/test_manifest.py @@@ -425,12 -464,22 +425,19 @@@ class TestFileListTest(TempDirTestCase) assert file_list.files == ['b.txt'] self.assertWarnings() + file_list = FileList() + file_list.files = ['a.py', 'b.txt', l('d/c.pyc'), 'e.pyo'] + file_list.process_template_line('global-exclude .py[co]') + file_list.sort() + assert file_list.files == ['a.py', 'b.txt'] + self.assertNoWarnings() + # recursive-include ```
      author:
         url:https://github.com/rbarrois
         type:Person
         name:rbarrois
      datePublished:2016-11-15T18:09:49.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:4
      url:https://github.com/849/setuptools/issues/849
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:Since setuptools 28.5.0, a "global-exclude .pyc" no longer matches .pyc files
      articleBody:Since commit bb45468d27615c2ce9f9c9757a367c44d6ee80d2, if a project's MANIFEST.in contains ``global-exclude .py[co]``, the archive generated with ``python setup.py sdist`` will still contain all ``.pyc`` / ``.pyo`` files. The test below shows that this line worked in setuptools 28.4.0, and broke in setuptools 28.5.0. I'm not sure whether this can be considered a bug: the previous implementation looked up patterns without any anchoring, whereas the new one forces users to explicitly include wildcards in their ``MANIFEST.in``. However, I think this change should have been mentioned in the version Changelog. ```patch diff --cc setuptools/tests/test_manifest.py index 6360270,ef4beda..0000000 --- a/setuptools/tests/test_manifest.py +++ b/setuptools/tests/test_manifest.py @@@ -425,12 -464,22 +425,19 @@@ class TestFileListTest(TempDirTestCase) assert file_list.files == ['b.txt'] self.assertWarnings() + file_list = FileList() + file_list.files = ['a.py', 'b.txt', l('d/c.pyc'), 'e.pyo'] + file_list.process_template_line('global-exclude .py[co]') + file_list.sort() + assert file_list.files == ['a.py', 'b.txt'] + self.assertNoWarnings() + # recursive-include ```
      author:
         url:https://github.com/rbarrois
         type:Person
         name:rbarrois
      datePublished:2016-11-15T18:09:49.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:4
      url:https://github.com/849/setuptools/issues/849
Person:
      url:https://github.com/rbarrois
      name:rbarrois
      url:https://github.com/rbarrois
      name:rbarrois
InteractionCounter:
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:4
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:4

Analytics and Tracking {πŸ“Š}

  • Site Verification - Google

Libraries {πŸ“š}

  • Clipboard.js
  • D3.js
  • Lodash

Emails and Hosting {βœ‰οΈ}

Mail Servers:

  • aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

Name Servers:

  • dns1.p08.nsone.net
  • dns2.p08.nsone.net
  • dns3.p08.nsone.net
  • dns4.p08.nsone.net
  • ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
  • ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
  • ns-421.awsdns-52.com
  • ns-520.awsdns-01.net
9.61s.