Here's how GITHUB.COM makes money* and how much!

*Please read our disclaimer before using our estimates.
Loading...

GITHUB . COM {}

Detected CMS Systems:

  1. Analyzed Page
  2. Matching Content Categories
  3. CMS
  4. Monthly Traffic Estimate
  5. How Does Github.com Make Money
  6. How Much Does Github.com Make
  7. Wordpress Themes And Plugins
  8. Keywords
  9. Topics
  10. Payment Methods
  11. Questions
  12. Schema
  13. External Links
  14. Analytics And Tracking
  15. Libraries
  16. Hosting Providers

We are analyzing https://github.com/pypa/pipenv/issues/4992.

Title:
Refactor utils.py into a utils module to reduce code complexity and prune out unused utils. Β· Issue #4992 Β· pypa/pipenv
Description:
Placeholder for news item for PR Ref: #4990 The issue The pipenv/utils.py has grown to 2338 lines of code, which makes it unwieldy and disorganized. When trying to consider larger bugs and refactors this is problematic because of the log...
Website Age:
17 years and 8 months (reg. 2007-10-09).

Matching Content Categories {πŸ“š}

  • Technology & Computing
  • Mobile Technology & AI
  • Education

Content Management System {πŸ“}

What CMS is github.com built with?


Github.com is powered by WORDPRESS.

Traffic Estimate {πŸ“ˆ}

What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?

πŸš€πŸŒ  Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,000,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Github.com Make Money? {πŸ’Έ}


Subscription Packages {πŸ’³}

We've located a dedicated page on github.com that might include details about subscription plans or recurring payments. We identified it based on the word pricing in one of its internal links. Below, you'll find additional estimates for its monthly recurring revenues.

How Much Does Github.com Make? {πŸ’°}


Subscription Packages {πŸ’³}

Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($). They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 4,989,889 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $20,957,532.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $251,490,385.

Wordpress Themes and Plugins {🎨}

What WordPress theme does this site use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.

What WordPress plugins does this website use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.

Keywords {πŸ”}

code, matteius, issue, utils, development, merged, sign, module, complexity, enhancement, related, projects, utilspy, unused, type, added, navigation, pull, requests, actions, security, refactor, reduce, prune, closed, lines, git, annotations, ultimately, unit, tests, removed, feature, request, awaitingreview, awaiting, review, maintainer, mentioned, category, affects, workflow, github, milestone, footer, skip, content, menu, product, solutions,

Topics {βœ’οΈ}

utils module organized code reorg utils reduce code complexity proposing reorg'ing test suite showing good code organization matteius closed removed pipenv/core projects milestone utils module unused code lines pipenv/utils activity matteius matteius mentioned unused utils existing utils logical complexity projects pr ref pr related development py code news item larger bugs fix move functionality type naming conventions draw back git annotations legacy annotations git history dropped due ide tipped awaiting-review awaiting review convert_deps_to_pip function milestone relationships enhancement request github issue code pr 2338 lines core type enhancement πŸ’‘ py skip jump sign

Payment Methods {πŸ“Š}

  • Braintree

Questions {❓}

  • Already have an account?

Schema {πŸ—ΊοΈ}

DiscussionForumPosting:
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:Refactor utils.py into a utils module to reduce code complexity and prune out unused utils.
      articleBody:Placeholder for news item for PR Ref: https://github.com/pypa/pipenv/pull/4990 ## The issue The pipenv/utils.py has grown to 2338 lines of code, which makes it unwieldy and disorganized. When trying to consider larger bugs and refactors this is problematic because of the logical complexity of navigating around and understanding what kind of util you are looking at. I would like to do something similar with core.py at some point as well, but this is my first iteration of proposing reorg'ing some of the code. ## The fix Move the existing utils.py code into a utils module organized by functionality type. This is a first pass at it, and I suspect there may be some tweaking to my naming conventions to make everyone happy. The only draw back I see to doing this is loosing some of the git annotations around this code, but ultimately that would happen whenever we get around to organizing the code better and I think good code organization is more important than legacy annotations which would still ultimately be in the git history. The only modifications to code being moved are the following methods have been dropped due to lack of use: escape_grouped_arguments + unit tests parse_python_version + unit tests add_to_set sys_version get_indexes_from_requirement interrupt_handled_subprocess rmtree Also two unused code lines were removed pipenv/core.py because I had already run the test suite showing they were not used after my IDE tipped me off about that.
      author:
         url:https://github.com/matteius
         type:Person
         name:matteius
      datePublished:2022-03-18T23:34:00.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:1
      url:https://github.com/4992/pipenv/issues/4992
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:Refactor utils.py into a utils module to reduce code complexity and prune out unused utils.
      articleBody:Placeholder for news item for PR Ref: https://github.com/pypa/pipenv/pull/4990 ## The issue The pipenv/utils.py has grown to 2338 lines of code, which makes it unwieldy and disorganized. When trying to consider larger bugs and refactors this is problematic because of the logical complexity of navigating around and understanding what kind of util you are looking at. I would like to do something similar with core.py at some point as well, but this is my first iteration of proposing reorg'ing some of the code. ## The fix Move the existing utils.py code into a utils module organized by functionality type. This is a first pass at it, and I suspect there may be some tweaking to my naming conventions to make everyone happy. The only draw back I see to doing this is loosing some of the git annotations around this code, but ultimately that would happen whenever we get around to organizing the code better and I think good code organization is more important than legacy annotations which would still ultimately be in the git history. The only modifications to code being moved are the following methods have been dropped due to lack of use: escape_grouped_arguments + unit tests parse_python_version + unit tests add_to_set sys_version get_indexes_from_requirement interrupt_handled_subprocess rmtree Also two unused code lines were removed pipenv/core.py because I had already run the test suite showing they were not used after my IDE tipped me off about that.
      author:
         url:https://github.com/matteius
         type:Person
         name:matteius
      datePublished:2022-03-18T23:34:00.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:1
      url:https://github.com/4992/pipenv/issues/4992
Person:
      url:https://github.com/matteius
      name:matteius
      url:https://github.com/matteius
      name:matteius
InteractionCounter:
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:1
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:1

Analytics and Tracking {πŸ“Š}

  • Site Verification - Google

Libraries {πŸ“š}

  • Clipboard.js
  • D3.js
  • Lodash

Emails and Hosting {βœ‰οΈ}

Mail Servers:

  • aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

Name Servers:

  • dns1.p08.nsone.net
  • dns2.p08.nsone.net
  • dns3.p08.nsone.net
  • dns4.p08.nsone.net
  • ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
  • ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
  • ns-421.awsdns-52.com
  • ns-520.awsdns-01.net
8.7s.