
GITHUB . COM {
}
Detected CMS Systems:
- Wordpress (2 occurrences)
Title:
Improve README.rst Β· Issue #446 Β· pydantic/pydantic
Description:
I've conducted a small survey amongst my colleagues about what they would like to be improved in pydantic as a github project. Many of them said that an almost blank README.rst make them think ...
Website Age:
17 years and 8 months (reg. 2007-10-09).
Matching Content Categories {π}
- Video & Online Content
- Social Networks
- Education
Content Management System {π}
What CMS is github.com built with?
Github.com employs WORDPRESS.
Traffic Estimate {π}
What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?
ππ Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month
Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,000,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.
check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush
How Does Github.com Make Money? {πΈ}
Subscription Packages {π³}
We've located a dedicated page on github.com that might include details about subscription plans or recurring payments. We identified it based on the word pricing in one of its internal links. Below, you'll find additional estimates for its monthly recurring revenues.How Much Does Github.com Make? {π°}
Subscription Packages {π³}
Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($).
They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 4,989,889 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $20,957,532.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $251,490,385.
Wordpress Themes and Plugins {π¨}
What WordPress theme does this site use?
It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.
What WordPress plugins does this website use?
It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.
Keywords {π}
github, pydantic, samuelcolvin, documentation, readmerst, sign, issue, pilosus, make, docs, link, readme, improve, projects, people, commented, navigation, source, star, code, issues, pull, requests, actions, security, closed, good, developers, follow, structure, contributing, links, test, status, version, member, added, type, milestone, footer, skip, content, menu, product, solutions, resources, open, enterprise, pricing, search,
Topics {βοΈ}
cheeseshop source code improve readme include download numbers comment metadata assignees github issues prominent incase people conda-forge link completedin e2e8e1e sign good point issue tracker pydantic docs blank readme richer readme github links great documentation documentation link type projects projects people saving people github project github users github link small survey social network quick introduction mouse clicks essential things concise manner draft version final version ~800px high projects milestone milestone relationships docs contributing section pypi/bigquery readme rst make documentation added pydantic github rst link sign star contributing pypi make skip
Payment Methods {π}
- Braintree
Questions {β}
- Already have an account?
Schema {πΊοΈ}
DiscussionForumPosting:
context:https://schema.org
headline:Improve README.rst
articleBody:I've conducted a small survey amongst my colleagues about what they would like to be improved in *pydantic* as a github project. Many of them said that an almost blank ``README.rst`` make them think the package is not really alive. I think it's a good point. As many developers use GitHub as a kind of social network, checking for projects people they follow like or star, we need a quick introduction to what *pydantic* is. I know it's already in the documentation. But saving people a few mouse clicks may make a difference.
`README.rst` should not copy or extend a great documentation we already have. Instead it should tell GitHub users (i.e. developers) the most essential things about *pydantic* in a concise manner.
I'd suggest the following structure:
* Intro (what's pydantic)
* Installation (pip)
* A Simple Example (a first example from the docs)
* Contributing (link to contributing section in the docs)
* Links
* Documentation
* License
* Releases in the CheeseShop
* Source code (GitHub link)
* Issue tracker (GitHub Issues)
* Test status
* Test coverage
author:
url:https://github.com/pilosus
type:Person
name:pilosus
datePublished:2019-03-31T18:01:51.000Z
interactionStatistic:
type:InteractionCounter
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:3
url:https://github.com/446/pydantic/issues/446
context:https://schema.org
headline:Improve README.rst
articleBody:I've conducted a small survey amongst my colleagues about what they would like to be improved in *pydantic* as a github project. Many of them said that an almost blank ``README.rst`` make them think the package is not really alive. I think it's a good point. As many developers use GitHub as a kind of social network, checking for projects people they follow like or star, we need a quick introduction to what *pydantic* is. I know it's already in the documentation. But saving people a few mouse clicks may make a difference.
`README.rst` should not copy or extend a great documentation we already have. Instead it should tell GitHub users (i.e. developers) the most essential things about *pydantic* in a concise manner.
I'd suggest the following structure:
* Intro (what's pydantic)
* Installation (pip)
* A Simple Example (a first example from the docs)
* Contributing (link to contributing section in the docs)
* Links
* Documentation
* License
* Releases in the CheeseShop
* Source code (GitHub link)
* Issue tracker (GitHub Issues)
* Test status
* Test coverage
author:
url:https://github.com/pilosus
type:Person
name:pilosus
datePublished:2019-03-31T18:01:51.000Z
interactionStatistic:
type:InteractionCounter
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:3
url:https://github.com/446/pydantic/issues/446
Person:
url:https://github.com/pilosus
name:pilosus
url:https://github.com/pilosus
name:pilosus
InteractionCounter:
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:3
interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
userInteractionCount:3
External Links {π}(2)
Analytics and Tracking {π}
- Site Verification - Google
Libraries {π}
- Clipboard.js
- D3.js
- Lodash
Emails and Hosting {βοΈ}
Mail Servers:
- aspmx.l.google.com
- alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
- alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
Name Servers:
- dns1.p08.nsone.net
- dns2.p08.nsone.net
- dns3.p08.nsone.net
- dns4.p08.nsone.net
- ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
- ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
- ns-421.awsdns-52.com
- ns-520.awsdns-01.net