Here's how GITHUB.COM makes money* and how much!

*Please read our disclaimer before using our estimates.
Loading...

GITHUB . COM {}

Detected CMS Systems:

  1. Analyzed Page
  2. Matching Content Categories
  3. CMS
  4. Monthly Traffic Estimate
  5. How Does Github.com Make Money
  6. How Much Does Github.com Make
  7. Wordpress Themes And Plugins
  8. Keywords
  9. Topics
  10. Payment Methods
  11. Questions
  12. Schema
  13. External Links
  14. Analytics And Tracking
  15. Libraries
  16. Hosting Providers

We are analyzing https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/issues/4106.

Title:
1.9.1 breaks backward compatibility Β· Issue #4106 Β· pydantic/pydantic
Description:
Checks I added a descriptive title to this issue I have searched (google, github) for similar issues and couldn't find anything I have read and followed the docs and still think this is a bug B...
Website Age:
17 years and 8 months (reg. 2007-10-09).

Matching Content Categories {πŸ“š}

  • News & Politics
  • Technology & Computing
  • Dating & Relationships

Content Management System {πŸ“}

What CMS is github.com built with?


Github.com relies on WORDPRESS.

Traffic Estimate {πŸ“ˆ}

What is the average monthly size of github.com audience?

πŸš€πŸŒ  Tremendous Traffic: 10M - 20M visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,653,731 visitors per month in the current month.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Github.com Make Money? {πŸ’Έ}


Subscription Packages {πŸ’³}

We've located a dedicated page on github.com that might include details about subscription plans or recurring payments. We identified it based on the word pricing in one of its internal links. Below, you'll find additional estimates for its monthly recurring revenues.

How Much Does Github.com Make? {πŸ’°}


Subscription Packages {πŸ’³}

Prices on github.com are in US Dollars ($). They range from $4.00/month to $21.00/month.
We estimate that the site has approximately 5,316,083 paying customers.
The estimated monthly recurring revenue (MRR) is $22,327,549.
The estimated annual recurring revenues (ARR) are $267,930,588.

Wordpress Themes and Plugins {🎨}

What WordPress theme does this site use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any theme on the page.

What WordPress plugins does this website use?

It is strange but we were not able to detect any plugins on the page.

Keywords {πŸ”}

pydantic, issue, bug, change, sign, backward, pvicente, added, add, fix, samuelcolvin, breaks, compatibility, github, version, mentioned, eigenein, require, hramezani, commented, navigation, issues, pull, requests, actions, security, closed, docs, python, clang, mypy, complaining, patch, str, related, commit, references, member, breaking, prettywood, log, type, projects, milestone, footer, skip, content, menu, product, solutions,

Topics {βœ’οΈ}

/users/pedrovicente/cytora/risk-stream-service/ completed hramezani mentioned venv/lib/python3 matches argument types comment metadata assignees pvicente mentioned similar issues add breaking change add breaking change samuelcolvin closed pydantic version pydantic v1 backward compatible docs fix issue import pydantic model = pydantic change log add cls_kwargs={} added descriptive title ['email-validator' 'typing-extensions'] field_definitions kwargs __module__=__name__ overload variant regression compared update history projects milestone milestone relationships personal information 1 tuple[type type projects issue pydantic python v1 dict[str github patch add change fix type sign str skip jump searched google

Payment Methods {πŸ“Š}

  • Braintree

Questions {❓}

  • @samuelcolvin shall we add **Breaking Change in the change of 42acd8f as well?
  • Already have an account?

Schema {πŸ—ΊοΈ}

DiscussionForumPosting:
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:1.9.1 breaks backward compatibility
      articleBody:### Checks * [X] I added a descriptive title to this issue * [X] I have searched (google, github) for similar issues and couldn't find anything * [X] I have read and followed [the docs](https://pydantic-docs.helpmanual.io/) and still think this is a bug <!-- Sorry to sound so draconian, but every second saved replying to issues is time spend improving pydantic :-) --> # Bug Output of `python -c "import pydantic.utils; print(pydantic.utils.version_info())"`: ``` pydantic version: 1.9.1 pydantic compiled: True install path: /Users/pedrovicente/cytora/risk-stream-service/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pydantic python version: 3.9.11 (main, May 4 2022, 15:54:04) [Clang 13.1.6 (clang-1316.0.21.2.3)] platform: macOS-12.3.1-arm64-arm-64bit optional deps. installed: ['email-validator', 'typing-extensions'] ... ``` <!-- or if you're using pydantic prior to v1.3, manually include: OS, python version and pydantic version --> <!-- Please read the [docs](https://pydantic-docs.helpmanual.io/) and search through issues to confirm your bug hasn't already been reported. --> #3713 [PR](https://github.com/samuelcolvin/pydantic/pull/3713/files#r878228704) breaks backward compatibility. I think it should have been released as 2.0 and not as 1.9.1. No matter it has a default value because there are **field_definitions** kwargs after it. Mypy was complaining and I had to add cls_kwargs={}, when calling it after updating from 1.9.0 to 1.9.1, so the change is not backward compatible and shouldn't have been a semver patch version release. <!-- Where possible please include a self-contained code snippet describing your bug: --> ```py model = pydantic.create_model( model_name, __config__=None, __base__=None, __module__=__name__, __validators__={}, **{k: (v, ...) for k, v in attributes.items()}, ... ``` After upgrade from 1.9.0 to 1.9.1 mypy is complaining with: ``` error: No overload variant of "create_model" matches argument types "str", "None", "None", "str", "Dict[<nothing>, <nothing>]", "Dict[str, Tuple[type, ellipsis]]" ```
      author:
         url:https://github.com/pvicente
         type:Person
         name:pvicente
      datePublished:2022-05-23T08:32:29.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:3
      url:https://github.com/4106/pydantic/issues/4106
      context:https://schema.org
      headline:1.9.1 breaks backward compatibility
      articleBody:### Checks * [X] I added a descriptive title to this issue * [X] I have searched (google, github) for similar issues and couldn't find anything * [X] I have read and followed [the docs](https://pydantic-docs.helpmanual.io/) and still think this is a bug <!-- Sorry to sound so draconian, but every second saved replying to issues is time spend improving pydantic :-) --> # Bug Output of `python -c "import pydantic.utils; print(pydantic.utils.version_info())"`: ``` pydantic version: 1.9.1 pydantic compiled: True install path: /Users/pedrovicente/cytora/risk-stream-service/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pydantic python version: 3.9.11 (main, May 4 2022, 15:54:04) [Clang 13.1.6 (clang-1316.0.21.2.3)] platform: macOS-12.3.1-arm64-arm-64bit optional deps. installed: ['email-validator', 'typing-extensions'] ... ``` <!-- or if you're using pydantic prior to v1.3, manually include: OS, python version and pydantic version --> <!-- Please read the [docs](https://pydantic-docs.helpmanual.io/) and search through issues to confirm your bug hasn't already been reported. --> #3713 [PR](https://github.com/samuelcolvin/pydantic/pull/3713/files#r878228704) breaks backward compatibility. I think it should have been released as 2.0 and not as 1.9.1. No matter it has a default value because there are **field_definitions** kwargs after it. Mypy was complaining and I had to add cls_kwargs={}, when calling it after updating from 1.9.0 to 1.9.1, so the change is not backward compatible and shouldn't have been a semver patch version release. <!-- Where possible please include a self-contained code snippet describing your bug: --> ```py model = pydantic.create_model( model_name, __config__=None, __base__=None, __module__=__name__, __validators__={}, **{k: (v, ...) for k, v in attributes.items()}, ... ``` After upgrade from 1.9.0 to 1.9.1 mypy is complaining with: ``` error: No overload variant of "create_model" matches argument types "str", "None", "None", "str", "Dict[<nothing>, <nothing>]", "Dict[str, Tuple[type, ellipsis]]" ```
      author:
         url:https://github.com/pvicente
         type:Person
         name:pvicente
      datePublished:2022-05-23T08:32:29.000Z
      interactionStatistic:
         type:InteractionCounter
         interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
         userInteractionCount:3
      url:https://github.com/4106/pydantic/issues/4106
Person:
      url:https://github.com/pvicente
      name:pvicente
      url:https://github.com/pvicente
      name:pvicente
InteractionCounter:
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:3
      interactionType:https://schema.org/CommentAction
      userInteractionCount:3

Analytics and Tracking {πŸ“Š}

  • Site Verification - Google

Libraries {πŸ“š}

  • Clipboard.js
  • D3.js
  • Lodash

Emails and Hosting {βœ‰οΈ}

Mail Servers:

  • aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
  • alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

Name Servers:

  • dns1.p08.nsone.net
  • dns2.p08.nsone.net
  • dns3.p08.nsone.net
  • dns4.p08.nsone.net
  • ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
  • ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
  • ns-421.awsdns-52.com
  • ns-520.awsdns-01.net
8.87s.