DRAFTS . CSSWG . ORG {}

Analyzed Page
Matching Content Categories
CMS
Monthly Traffic Estimate
How Does Drafts.csswg.org Make Money
Keywords
Topics
External Links

We are analyzing https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/issues-cr-2013.

Title:
CSS Values and Units Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2013-07-30 CR
Description:
No description found...
Website Age:
16 years and 11 months (reg. 2008-08-03).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

Telecommunications
Video & Online Content
Non-Profit & Charity

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is drafts.csswg.org built with?

Custom-built

No common CMS systems were detected on Drafts.csswg.org, and no known web development framework was identified.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of drafts.csswg.org audience?

🚄 Respectable Traffic: 10k - 20k visitors per month

Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Drafts.csswg.org Make Money? {💸}

We see no obvious way the site makes money.

Some websites aren't about earning revenue; they're built to connect communities or raise awareness. There are numerous motivations behind creating websites. This might be one of them. Drafts.csswg.org might have a hidden revenue stream, but it's not something we can detect.

Keywords {🔍}

response, issue, accepted, closed, summary, comment, httplistsworgarchivespublicwwwstylemarhtml, resolved, rejected, editorial, level, verified, httplistsworgarchivespublicwwwstyleaprhtml, comments, outofscope, invalid, clarify, httplistsworgarchivespublicwwwstyleocthtml, unit, simon, sapin, httpslistsworgarchivespublicwwwstylemarhtml, add, spec, css, values, units, disposition, call, document, httpwwwworgtrcrcssvalues, editors, draft, httpdevworgcsswgcssvalues, color, coding, convention, positive, negative, deferred, open, issues, marked, retracted, commentors, acceptance, escaped, quotes, examples, dennis,

Topics {✒️}

org/archives/public/www-style/2013oct/0299 org/archives/public/www-style/2014mar/0183 org/archives/public/www-style/2013sep/0843 org/archives/public/www-style/2014mar/0184 org/archives/public/www-style/2013oct/0292 org/archives/public/www-style/2014mar/0182 org/archives/public/www-style/2014jan/0586 org/archives/public/www-style/2014mar/0129 org/archives/public/www-style/2014mar/0068 org/archives/public/www-style/2014mar/0127 org/archives/public/www-style/2015mar/0317 org/archives/public/www-style/2014apr/0114 org/archives/public/www-style/2014apr/0188 org/tr/2013/cr-css3-values-20130730/ editor' org/csswg/css3-values/ embedded style sheets clarify base url color coding convention provide historical definitions dennis german comment cameron mccormack comment wallace hermano comment simon sapin comment alan stearns comment tab atkins comment cr-level specs negative response deferred org/mid/20131117193837 positive response rejected css values //www shinyu comment html response jp response call document html resolved restricting length private feedback trivial addition concrete plans lc due response rejected rejected resolved html closed editorial issue 2 editorial issue 3 editorial issue 4 editorial issue 5 html issue 6 accepted resolved

External Links {🔗}(15)

1.82s.