DOCS . MICROSOFT . COM {}

Analyzed Page
Matching Content Categories
CMS
Monthly Traffic Estimate
How Does Docs.microsoft.com Make Money
Keywords
Topics
Questions
Schema
Social Networks
External Links
Analytics And Tracking

We began analyzing https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/nuget/nuget-org/id-prefix-reservation, but it redirected us to https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/nuget/nuget-org/id-prefix-reservation. The analysis below is for the second page.

Title[redir]:
ID Prefix Reservation | Microsoft Learn
Description:
Package ID Prefix Reservation feature description and author guide.

Matching Content Categories {📚}

Shopping
Travel
Music

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is docs.microsoft.com built with?

Custom-built

No common CMS systems were detected on Docs.microsoft.com, and no known web development framework was identified.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of docs.microsoft.com audience?

🌠 Phenomenal Traffic: 5M - 10M visitors per month

Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 5,002,338 visitors per month in the current month.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Docs.microsoft.com Make Money? {💸}

We don't see any clear sign of profit-making.

Many websites are intended to earn money, but some serve to share ideas or build connections. Websites exist for all kinds of purposes. This might be one of them. Docs.microsoft.com could be secretly minting cash, but we can't detect the process.

Keywords {🔍}

prefix, package, reserved, reservation, owners, owner, visual, nugetorg, packages, indicator, feed, criteria, studio, scenarios, application, advanced, search, prefixes, addition, reservations, subsets, remove, microsoft, service, reserve, additional, identifying, version, submitted, matches, gallery, public, originates, contributors, metadata, element, party, provider, identity, reserving, information, properties, details, happen, delegating, multiple, submissions, existing, note, source,

Topics {✒️}

party feed provider id prefix reservation prefix id reservation package id prefix id prefix reservations feed search service assigned prefix reservation reserved id prefix advanced prefix reservations visual studio appears provide prefix reservations full package authoring delegating prefix subsets prefix reservation reserving id prefixes including subprefix delegation visual indicator showing advanced scenarios id prefix license metadata element iconurl metadata element icon metadata element additional identifying questions open source projects 'microsoft' owns 'microsoft visual studio search service previously existing packages owner display names reservation owner org gallery package submissions confirm owner identity single feed versions v2 feed prefix subsets package source reserved prefix prefix reserved package consumers package author visual indicator visual indicators prefix public package matches package originates id request delegation avoid common

Questions {❓}

Are the identifying properties of the packages that match the package ID prefix clear and consistent (especially the package author)?
Do the packages have a license (using the license metadata element and NOT licenseUrl which is being deprecated)?
Does the package ID prefix properly and clearly identify the reservation owner?
If the packages have an icon (using the iconUrl metadata element), are they also using the icon metadata element?
Is the package ID prefix something common that should not belong to any individual owner or organization?
Was this page helpful?
Would not reserving the package ID prefix cause ambiguity, confusion, or other harm to the community?

Schema {🗺️}

BreadcrumbList:
      context:https://schema.org
      itemListElement:
            name:Learn
            position:1
            type:ListItem
            item:https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/
ListItem:
      name:Learn
      position:1
      item:https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/