Here's how LISTS.W3.ORG makes money* and how much!

*Please read our disclaimer before using our estimates.
Loading...

LISTS . W3 . ORG {}

  1. Analyzed Page
  2. Matching Content Categories
  3. CMS
  4. Monthly Traffic Estimate
  5. How Does Lists.w3.org Make Money
  6. Keywords
  7. Topics
  8. Questions
  9. External Links

We are analyzing https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0217.html.

Title:
Re: [css-flexbox] static position of absolutely-positioned flex items still "at-risk"? from fantasai on 2013-09-11 ([email protected] from September 2013)
Description:
No description found...
Website Age:
31 years and 0 months (reg. 1994-07-06).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

  • Social Networks
  • Telecommunications
  • Shopping

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is lists.w3.org built with?

Website use hypermail 3.0.0, see https://github.com/hypermail-project/hypermail/.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of lists.w3.org audience?

🚄 Respectable Traffic: 10k - 20k visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 10,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Lists.w3.org Make Money? {💸}

We can't figure out the monetization strategy.

While profit motivates many websites, others exist to inspire, entertain, or provide valuable resources. Websites have a variety of goals. And this might be one of them. Lists.w3.org could have a money-making trick up its sleeve, but it's undetectable for now.

Keywords {🔍}

message, flex, static, position, atrisk, absolutelypositioned, items, fantasai, cssflexbox, reply, thread, spec, layout, wwwstyleworg, september, body, respond, messages, previous, date, container, utc, mail, archives, home, mailing, lists, public, options, related, replies, fantasailistsinkedbladenet, wed, sep, messageid, eainkedbladenet, daniel, holbert, wrote, flexbox, features, calculation, versions, httpwwwworgtrcssflexboxstatus, httpdevworgcsswgcssflexboxstatus, staticposition, chunk, remained, considered, discussed,

Topics {✒️}

[css-shapes] shape-image-threshold absolutely-positioned flex items [css-flexbox] static position fixed-size flex container static-position chunk options related messages sole flex item org message-id daniel holbert wrote insanely long sentence message previous message message body respond static position flex container flexbox spec org september 2013 flex layout resulting size message body previous message message archived message mail ed versions //www wg discussed alan stearns mail actions grid layout spec ends tr archives search thread replies w3 message respond spec layout fantasai date archives thread risk reply wed 58 pm features //dev remained considered today

Questions {❓}

  • > while now -- is it still considered to be "at-risk"?
  • Next in thread: fantasai: "Re: [css-flexbox] static position of absolutely-positioned flex items still "at-risk"?
  • Next message: fantasai: "Re: [css-flexbox] static position of absolutely-positioned flex items still "at-risk"?
  • Re: [css-flexbox] static position of absolutely-positioned flex items still "at-risk"?
  • Reply: fantasai: "Re: [css-flexbox] static position of absolutely-positioned flex items still "at-risk"?

2s.