DRAFTS . CSSWG . ORG {}

Analyzed Page
Matching Content Categories
CMS
Monthly Traffic Estimate
How Does Drafts.csswg.org Make Money
Keywords
Topics
External Links

We are analyzing https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/issues-cr-2018.

Title:
CSS Values and Units Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2018-08-14 CR
Description:
No description found...
Website Age:
16 years and 11 months (reg. 2008-08-03).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

Video & Online Content
Social Networks
Non-Profit & Charity

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is drafts.csswg.org built with?

Custom-built

No common CMS systems were detected on Drafts.csswg.org, and no known web development framework was identified.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of drafts.csswg.org audience?

✈️ Decent Traffic: 20k - 50k visitors per month

Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 21,480 visitors per month in the current month.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Drafts.csswg.org Make Money? {💸}

We can't tell how the site generates income.

Not all websites are made for profit; some exist to inform or educate users. Or any other reason why people make websites. And this might be the case. Drafts.csswg.org has a secret sauce for making money, but we can't detect it yet.

Keywords {🔍}

response, accepted, rejected, verified, issue, comment, httpsgithubcomwccsswgdraftsissuesissuecomment, invalid, closed, summary, httpsgithubcomwccsswgdraftsissues, resolved, comments, draft, outofscope, editorial, css, values, units, level, disposition, dated, httpswwwworgtrcrcssvalues, editors, httpdraftscsswgorgcssvalues, color, coding, convention, positive, negative, deferred, open, issues, marked, retracted, commentors, acceptance, define, propertyname, notation, exclude, listification, fantasai, httpsgithubcomwccsswgdraftscommitaafabbdacefcddbefac, commenter, editor, httpslistsworgarchivespublicwwwstyleocthtml, clarify, properties, override,

Topics {✒️}

org/archives/public/www-style/2018oct/0005 /w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/5a4a12f26ab9bdac96e06fcd3088d88befa72c57 closed /w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/e01d805b252d1e4ac5201d2b4330f45d705f967c closed /w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c1c4508e35bff3e29eb9d5b6f3ba2d390adb7866 verified org/tr/2018/cr-css-values-3-20180814/ editor' /w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3482 response /w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3146 /w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3270 org/css-values-3/ negative response deferred florian rivoal comment emilio álvarez comment color coding convention positive response rejected editor resolved css values fantasai comment response rejected //drafts csswg accepted resolved accepted verified closed exclude listification response //www verified editorial issue 3 draft rejected accepted issue issue 1 editorial comments https w3 http scope invalid marked outofscope retracted commentor' acceptance //github commenter //lists clarify properties

External Links {🔗}(14)

1.31s.