W3CTAG . GITHUB . IO {}

Analyzed Page
Matching Content Categories
CMS
Monthly Traffic Estimate
How Does W3ctag.github.io Make Money
Keywords
Topics
Questions
External Links

We are analyzing https://w3ctag.github.io/capability-urls/.

Title:
Good Practices for Capability URLs
Description:
No description found...
Website Age:
12 years and 3 months (reg. 2013-03-08).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

Mobile Technology & AI
Technology & Computing
Telecommunications

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is w3ctag.github.io built with?

Custom-built

No common CMS systems were detected on W3ctag.github.io, and no known web development framework was identified.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of w3ctag.github.io audience?

🚦 Initial Traffic: less than 1k visitors per month

Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 119 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does W3ctag.github.io Make Money? {💸}

We can't tell how the site generates income.

The purpose of some websites isn't monetary gain; they're meant to inform, educate, or foster collaboration. Everyone has unique reasons for building websites. This could be an example. W3ctag.github.io might be cashing in, but we can't detect the method they're using.

Keywords {🔍}

capability, urls, url, access, user, resource, users, password, page, email, accessed, application, pages, http, provide, security, web, account, document, content, link, private, browser, secret, people, links, capabilities, normal, history, site, applications, information, figure, calendar, create, authentication, design, reset, share, shared, accounts, header, public, include, risks, control, permissions, api, pass, system,

Topics {✒️}

io/capability-urls/ editor web-key proposal unique capability key tahoe-lafs recognised string org/${dir-capability}/path/ linden lab tracks support destructive acts cross-site request forgery current guest pass secret key guest pass history account-based access control tag finding exchanges fairly secure capability-based http servers normal account-based method accidentally added whitespace sequentially increasing integer web-based email service ui design considerations raise security concerns high entropy random suitably secure means world wide web google calendar encode access permissions org/access/{number} alternative security measures web-based services intended group websites private gists content-security-policy registration api life api requires authentication tokens avoid authentication overheads discussing versioned code dir2-mdmf-ro supporting user accounts unlike normal urls content design considerations provide acceptable security sufficiently high entropy incorporate capability urls capability urls areas capability urls evident supporting capability urls capability urls arising deploying capability urls

Questions {❓}

Could access be restricted using an account-based mechanism instead?
Should you use a protocol other than HTTP?

External Links {🔗}(23)

1.97s.