Here's how LINK.SPRINGER.COM makes money* and how much!

*Please read our disclaimer before using our estimates.
Loading...

LINK . SPRINGER . COM {}

  1. Analyzed Page
  2. Matching Content Categories
  3. CMS
  4. Monthly Traffic Estimate
  5. How Does Link.springer.com Make Money
  6. Keywords
  7. Topics
  8. Questions
  9. Schema
  10. External Links
  11. Analytics And Tracking
  12. Libraries
  13. CDN Services

We are analyzing https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1471-2148-7-s1-s4.

Title:
Suppression of long-branch attraction artefacts in the animal phylogeny using a site-heterogeneous model | BMC Ecology and Evolution
Description:
Background Thanks to the large amount of signal contained in genome-wide sequence alignments, phylogenomic analyses are converging towards highly supported trees. However, high statistical support does not imply that the tree is accurate. Systematic errors, such as the Long Branch Attraction (LBA) artefact, can be misleading, in particular when the taxon sampling is poor, or the outgroup is distant. In an otherwise consistent probabilistic framework, systematic errors in genome-wide analyses can be traced back to model mis-specification problems, which suggests that better models of sequence evolution should be devised, that would be more robust to tree reconstruction artefacts, even under the most challenging conditions. Methods We focus on a well characterized LBA artefact analyzed in a previous phylogenomic study of the metazoan tree, in which two fast-evolving animal phyla, nematodes and platyhelminths, emerge either at the base of all other Bilateria, or within protostomes, depending on the outgroup. We use this artefactual result as a case study for comparing the robustness of two alternative models: a standard, site-homogeneous model, based on an empirical matrix of amino-acid replacement (WAG), and a site-heterogeneous mixture model (CAT). In parallel, we propose a posterior predictive test, allowing one to measure how well a model acknowledges sequence saturation. Results Adopting a Bayesian framework, we show that the LBA artefact observed under WAG disappears when the site-heterogeneous model CAT is used. Using cross-validation, we further demonstrate that CAT has a better statistical fit than WAG on this data set. Finally, using our statistical goodness-of-fit test, we show that CAT, but not WAG, correctly accounts for the overall level of saturation, and that this is due to a better estimation of site-specific amino-acid preferences. Conclusion The CAT model appears to be more robust than WAG against LBA artefacts, essentially because it correctly anticipates the high probability of convergences and reversions implied by the small effective size of the amino-acid alphabet at each site of the alignment. More generally, our results provide strong evidence that site-specificities in the substitution process need be accounted for in order to obtain more reliable phylogenetic trees.
Website Age:
28 years and 1 months (reg. 1997-05-29).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

  • Education
  • Photography
  • Insurance

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is link.springer.com built with?

Custom-built

No common CMS systems were detected on Link.springer.com, and no known web development framework was identified.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of link.springer.com audience?

🌠 Phenomenal Traffic: 5M - 10M visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 5,000,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Link.springer.com Make Money? {💸}

We don't see any clear sign of profit-making.

Many websites are intended to earn money, but some serve to share ideas or build connections. Websites exist for all kinds of purposes. This might be one of them. Link.springer.com might be plotting its profit, but the way they're doing it isn't detectable yet.

Keywords {🔍}

model, article, cat, google, scholar, wag, observed, pubmed, models, posterior, site, data, number, distribution, cas, aminoacid, probability, predictive, phylogenetic, saturation, biol, artefacts, size, figure, methods, nematodes, process, tree, substitutions, evol, outgroup, case, sites, aminoacids, trees, lba, evolution, evolutionary, philippe, long, likelihood, state, sequence, reconstruction, obtained, protein, mol, sampling, level, sitespecific,

Topics {✒️}

site-specific amino-acid preferences small-orbit pseudo-model investigated amino-acid replacement process site-specific selective forces higher cross-validated log-likelihood amino-acid replacement processes long-branch attraction artefacts article download pdf site-specific biochemical preferences long-branch attraction artefact article number s4 cross-validation approach explained bona-fide statistical model slow-evolving close relatives including gamma-distributed rates cross-validatory comparison performed site-specific relative rates model mis-specification problems spread-versus-peaked tendencies genome-wide phylogenetic analysis genome-wide sequence alignments fast-evolving animal phyla context-dependent substitution rates encode amino-acid specificities n-step homoplasy probability broad amino-acid profile phylobayes home page empirical amino-acid profiles long branch attraction long-branch attraction dirichlet process device fr/mab/article posterior predictive p-values site-heterogeneous mixture model amino-acid patterns observed privacy choices/manage cookies bmc evol biol amino-acid replacement amino acid replacement substitution process returns small-orbit configuration leads long branch separating nematode/fungi taxon configuration computing bayes factors site-homogeneous model based poncelin de raucourt département de biochimie large-orbit model yields issue=s1 site-specific rates

Questions {❓}

  • Jeffroy O, Brinkmann H, Delsuc F, Philippe H: Phylogenomics: the beginning of incongruence?
  • Philippe H, Laurent J: How good are deep phylogenetic trees?
  • Philippe H, Lopez P, Brinkmann H, Budin K, Germot A, Laurent J, Moreira D, Müller M, Le Guyader H: Early-branching or fast-evolving eukaryotes?
  • Stefanovic S, Rice D, Palmer J: Long branch attraction, taxon sampling, and the earliest angiosperms: Amborella or monocots?
  • What exactly makes CAT more able to detect homoplasy?
  • Com/bmcevolbiol/7?

Schema {🗺️}

WebPage:
      mainEntity:
         headline:Suppression of long-branch attraction artefacts in the animal phylogeny using a site-heterogeneous model
         description:Thanks to the large amount of signal contained in genome-wide sequence alignments, phylogenomic analyses are converging towards highly supported trees. However, high statistical support does not imply that the tree is accurate. Systematic errors, such as the Long Branch Attraction (LBA) artefact, can be misleading, in particular when the taxon sampling is poor, or the outgroup is distant. In an otherwise consistent probabilistic framework, systematic errors in genome-wide analyses can be traced back to model mis-specification problems, which suggests that better models of sequence evolution should be devised, that would be more robust to tree reconstruction artefacts, even under the most challenging conditions. We focus on a well characterized LBA artefact analyzed in a previous phylogenomic study of the metazoan tree, in which two fast-evolving animal phyla, nematodes and platyhelminths, emerge either at the base of all other Bilateria, or within protostomes, depending on the outgroup. We use this artefactual result as a case study for comparing the robustness of two alternative models: a standard, site-homogeneous model, based on an empirical matrix of amino-acid replacement (WAG), and a site-heterogeneous mixture model (CAT). In parallel, we propose a posterior predictive test, allowing one to measure how well a model acknowledges sequence saturation. Adopting a Bayesian framework, we show that the LBA artefact observed under WAG disappears when the site-heterogeneous model CAT is used. Using cross-validation, we further demonstrate that CAT has a better statistical fit than WAG on this data set. Finally, using our statistical goodness-of-fit test, we show that CAT, but not WAG, correctly accounts for the overall level of saturation, and that this is due to a better estimation of site-specific amino-acid preferences. The CAT model appears to be more robust than WAG against LBA artefacts, essentially because it correctly anticipates the high probability of convergences and reversions implied by the small effective size of the amino-acid alphabet at each site of the alignment. More generally, our results provide strong evidence that site-specificities in the substitution process need be accounted for in order to obtain more reliable phylogenetic trees.
         datePublished:2007-02-08T00:00:00Z
         dateModified:2007-02-08T00:00:00Z
         pageStart:1
         pageEnd:14
         license:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0
         sameAs:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-S1-S4
         keywords:
            Effective Size
            Dirichlet Process
            Substitution Process
            Long Branch Attraction
            Posterior Predictive Distribution
            Evolutionary Biology
            Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography
            Entomology
            Genetics and Population Dynamics
            Life Sciences
            general
         image:
            https://media.springernature.com/lw1200/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-7-S1-S4/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_544_Fig1_HTML.jpg
            https://media.springernature.com/lw1200/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-7-S1-S4/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_544_Fig2_HTML.jpg
            https://media.springernature.com/lw1200/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-7-S1-S4/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_544_Fig3_HTML.jpg
            https://media.springernature.com/lw1200/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-7-S1-S4/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_544_Fig4_HTML.jpg
            https://media.springernature.com/lw1200/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-7-S1-S4/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_544_Fig5_HTML.jpg
         isPartOf:
            name:BMC Evolutionary Biology
            issn:
               1471-2148
            volumeNumber:7
            type:
               Periodical
               PublicationVolume
         publisher:
            name:BioMed Central
            logo:
               url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
               type:ImageObject
            type:Organization
         author:
               name:Nicolas Lartillot
               affiliation:
                     name:CNRS-Université de Montpellier 2
                     address:
                        name:Laboratoire d'Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier, UMR 5506, CNRS-Université de Montpellier 2, Montpellier Cedex 5, France
                        type:PostalAddress
                     type:Organization
               email:[email protected]
               type:Person
               name:Henner Brinkmann
               affiliation:
                     name:Université de Montréal
                     address:
                        name:Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
                        type:PostalAddress
                     type:Organization
               type:Person
               name:Hervé Philippe
               affiliation:
                     name:Université de Montréal
                     address:
                        name:Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
                        type:PostalAddress
                     type:Organization
               type:Person
         isAccessibleForFree:1
         type:ScholarlyArticle
      context:https://schema.org
ScholarlyArticle:
      headline:Suppression of long-branch attraction artefacts in the animal phylogeny using a site-heterogeneous model
      description:Thanks to the large amount of signal contained in genome-wide sequence alignments, phylogenomic analyses are converging towards highly supported trees. However, high statistical support does not imply that the tree is accurate. Systematic errors, such as the Long Branch Attraction (LBA) artefact, can be misleading, in particular when the taxon sampling is poor, or the outgroup is distant. In an otherwise consistent probabilistic framework, systematic errors in genome-wide analyses can be traced back to model mis-specification problems, which suggests that better models of sequence evolution should be devised, that would be more robust to tree reconstruction artefacts, even under the most challenging conditions. We focus on a well characterized LBA artefact analyzed in a previous phylogenomic study of the metazoan tree, in which two fast-evolving animal phyla, nematodes and platyhelminths, emerge either at the base of all other Bilateria, or within protostomes, depending on the outgroup. We use this artefactual result as a case study for comparing the robustness of two alternative models: a standard, site-homogeneous model, based on an empirical matrix of amino-acid replacement (WAG), and a site-heterogeneous mixture model (CAT). In parallel, we propose a posterior predictive test, allowing one to measure how well a model acknowledges sequence saturation. Adopting a Bayesian framework, we show that the LBA artefact observed under WAG disappears when the site-heterogeneous model CAT is used. Using cross-validation, we further demonstrate that CAT has a better statistical fit than WAG on this data set. Finally, using our statistical goodness-of-fit test, we show that CAT, but not WAG, correctly accounts for the overall level of saturation, and that this is due to a better estimation of site-specific amino-acid preferences. The CAT model appears to be more robust than WAG against LBA artefacts, essentially because it correctly anticipates the high probability of convergences and reversions implied by the small effective size of the amino-acid alphabet at each site of the alignment. More generally, our results provide strong evidence that site-specificities in the substitution process need be accounted for in order to obtain more reliable phylogenetic trees.
      datePublished:2007-02-08T00:00:00Z
      dateModified:2007-02-08T00:00:00Z
      pageStart:1
      pageEnd:14
      license:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0
      sameAs:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-S1-S4
      keywords:
         Effective Size
         Dirichlet Process
         Substitution Process
         Long Branch Attraction
         Posterior Predictive Distribution
         Evolutionary Biology
         Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography
         Entomology
         Genetics and Population Dynamics
         Life Sciences
         general
      image:
         https://media.springernature.com/lw1200/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-7-S1-S4/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_544_Fig1_HTML.jpg
         https://media.springernature.com/lw1200/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-7-S1-S4/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_544_Fig2_HTML.jpg
         https://media.springernature.com/lw1200/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-7-S1-S4/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_544_Fig3_HTML.jpg
         https://media.springernature.com/lw1200/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-7-S1-S4/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_544_Fig4_HTML.jpg
         https://media.springernature.com/lw1200/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-7-S1-S4/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_544_Fig5_HTML.jpg
      isPartOf:
         name:BMC Evolutionary Biology
         issn:
            1471-2148
         volumeNumber:7
         type:
            Periodical
            PublicationVolume
      publisher:
         name:BioMed Central
         logo:
            url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
            type:ImageObject
         type:Organization
      author:
            name:Nicolas Lartillot
            affiliation:
                  name:CNRS-Université de Montpellier 2
                  address:
                     name:Laboratoire d'Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier, UMR 5506, CNRS-Université de Montpellier 2, Montpellier Cedex 5, France
                     type:PostalAddress
                  type:Organization
            email:[email protected]
            type:Person
            name:Henner Brinkmann
            affiliation:
                  name:Université de Montréal
                  address:
                     name:Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
                     type:PostalAddress
                  type:Organization
            type:Person
            name:Hervé Philippe
            affiliation:
                  name:Université de Montréal
                  address:
                     name:Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
                     type:PostalAddress
                  type:Organization
            type:Person
      isAccessibleForFree:1
["Periodical","PublicationVolume"]:
      name:BMC Evolutionary Biology
      issn:
         1471-2148
      volumeNumber:7
Organization:
      name:BioMed Central
      logo:
         url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
         type:ImageObject
      name:CNRS-Université de Montpellier 2
      address:
         name:Laboratoire d'Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier, UMR 5506, CNRS-Université de Montpellier 2, Montpellier Cedex 5, France
         type:PostalAddress
      name:Université de Montréal
      address:
         name:Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
         type:PostalAddress
      name:Université de Montréal
      address:
         name:Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
         type:PostalAddress
ImageObject:
      url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
Person:
      name:Nicolas Lartillot
      affiliation:
            name:CNRS-Université de Montpellier 2
            address:
               name:Laboratoire d'Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier, UMR 5506, CNRS-Université de Montpellier 2, Montpellier Cedex 5, France
               type:PostalAddress
            type:Organization
      email:[email protected]
      name:Henner Brinkmann
      affiliation:
            name:Université de Montréal
            address:
               name:Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
               type:PostalAddress
            type:Organization
      name:Hervé Philippe
      affiliation:
            name:Université de Montréal
            address:
               name:Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
               type:PostalAddress
            type:Organization
PostalAddress:
      name:Laboratoire d'Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier, UMR 5506, CNRS-Université de Montpellier 2, Montpellier Cedex 5, France
      name:Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
      name:Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada

External Links {🔗}(174)

Analytics and Tracking {📊}

  • Google Tag Manager

Libraries {📚}

  • Clipboard.js
  • Prism.js

CDN Services {📦}

  • Crossref

4.79s.