Here's how LINK.SPRINGER.COM makes money* and how much!

*Please read our disclaimer before using our estimates.
Loading...

LINK . SPRINGER . COM {}

  1. Analyzed Page
  2. Matching Content Categories
  3. CMS
  4. Monthly Traffic Estimate
  5. How Does Link.springer.com Make Money
  6. Keywords
  7. Topics
  8. Questions
  9. Schema
  10. External Links
  11. Analytics And Tracking
  12. Libraries
  13. CDN Services

We are analyzing https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13361-011-0139-3.

Title:
Target-Decoy Approach and False Discovery Rate: When Things May Go Wrong | Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry
Description:
The target-decoy approach (TDA) has done the field of proteomics a great service by filling in the need to estimate the false discovery rates (FDR) of peptide identifications. While TDA is often viewed as a universal solution to the problem of FDR evaluation, we argue that the time has come to critically re-examine TDA and to acknowledge not only its merits but also its demerits. We demonstrate that some popular MS/MS search tools are not TDA-compliant and that it is easy to develop a non-TDA compliant tool that outperforms all TDA-compliant tools. Since the distinction between TDA-compliant and non-TDA compliant tools remains elusive, we are concerned about a possible proliferation of non-TDA-compliant tools in the future (developed with the best intentions). We are also concerned that estimation of the FDR by TDA awkwardly depends on a virtual coin toss and argue that it is important to take the coin toss factor out of our estimation of the FDR. Since computing FDR via TDA suffers from various restrictions, we argue that TDA is not needed when accurate p-values of individual Peptide-Spectrum Matches are available.
Website Age:
28 years and 1 months (reg. 1997-05-29).

Matching Content Categories {πŸ“š}

  • Education
  • Technology & Computing
  • Science

Content Management System {πŸ“}

What CMS is link.springer.com built with?

Custom-built

No common CMS systems were detected on Link.springer.com, and no known web development framework was identified.

Traffic Estimate {πŸ“ˆ}

What is the average monthly size of link.springer.com audience?

🌠 Phenomenal Traffic: 5M - 10M visitors per month


Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 5,000,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Link.springer.com Make Money? {πŸ’Έ}

The income method remains a mystery to us.

Many websites are intended to earn money, but some serve to share ideas or build connections. Websites exist for all kinds of purposes. This might be one of them. Link.springer.com could have a money-making trick up its sleeve, but it's undetectable for now.

Keywords {πŸ”}

sigma, tda, database, fdr, peptide, tools, search, scoring, peptides, decoy, oplus, article, scoreleft, mass, identifications, google, scholar, target, tool, fprs, databases, random, proteomics, fpr, cas, false, statistical, spectra, functions, tdacompliant, protein, left, function, msms, spectrum, sequest, ddleft, spectrometry, discovery, compute, computing, mascot, score, number, psms, approach, argue, xtandem, footnote, psm,

Topics {βœ’οΈ}

{\mathop{{\widehat{{fdr}}}}\nolimits_{{tda}} } false-positive rate determination false positive rate health grant 1-p41-rr024851 semi-supervised learning tda-compliant remains open ms/ms search algorithms typical ms/ms searches target-decoy search strategy popular ms/ms tools high-throughput mass spectrometry ms/ms search tool molecular sequence features ms-based peptide sequencing mass spectrometry-based proteomics large-scale proteomics experiments database-dependent scoring functions multi-stage search tools false discovery rate newly found n-myristoylated database-dependent scoring function 6th n-acetylated protein fpr-noncompliant scoring functions $$ \widehat{{fdr}}_{{etda}} high-throughput proteomics experiment large-scale protein identifications combined target-decoy database compute accurate p-values perfect peptide-spectrum match privacy choices/manage cookies ms/ms algorithms ms/ms searches ms-gf outperforms sequest ms/ms tools tda-compliant scoring functions ms-gf scoring {\left[ {1_{{score{\left fpr-compliant scoring function mass spectrometry literature precision mass spectrometry false discovery rates cid+etd spectral datasets related statistical concepts related subjects words multi-stage option individual peptide-spectrum matches {\left[ {{\sum\limits_{\sigma target-decoy approach scoring functions employed

Questions {❓}

  • , lead to new biological discoveries), should they be switched off?
  • 1 Can TDA be Exploited to Disguise Bogus Peptide Identifications as Good Ones?
  • 2 Can Tools That Do Not Comply with TDA be Useful?
  • 2 False Positive Rate and eTDA:Is TDA Needed if Accurate FPRs are Available?
  • 3 Can the Decoy and Target Databases Contain Shared Peptides?
  • 3 What are the Disadvantages of TDA?
  • 4 Can Computing FDR via FPR Substitute Approximating FDR via TDA?
  • 5 Are Individual FPRs Useful in the Context of High-Throughput Mass Spectrometry?
  • Does it mean that (i) Sequest is not TDA compliant, (ii) TDA only works correctly for a 50–50 split between the sizes of the target and decoy databases, or (iii) TDA does not provide a reliable estimate of FDR in the case of 50–50 split and should be practiced with decoy databases that are larger than the target database?
  • However, since such tests are difficult to do in case of commercial software (without access to the source code), multi-stage search tools, or complex tools like InsPecT, should TDA be avoided in conjunction with such tools?
  • Should Mascot (a useful tool whose source code is not available for a test of TDA compliance) be excluded from TDA studies?
  • Should TDA be run with decoy databases that are much larger than target databases to accurately measure FDRs of highly reliable peptide identifications?
  • Should we therefore declare eTDA as impractical?
  • What are the limits of TDA applicability when it comes to lowering the size of the database?
  • What are the limits of TDA applicability when it comes to lowering the size of the spectral dataset?
  • Would it be better to setup an FPR (rather than FDR) threshold for individual PSMs (that would clearly separate reliable and unreliable identifications) and avoid contaminating the output of the TDA approach with β‰ˆ 30 bogus peptide identifications?
  • Coli with 1% FDR, would it be a good reason to write a paper about a new N-acetylated protein and discuss its biological function?

Schema {πŸ—ΊοΈ}

WebPage:
      mainEntity:
         headline:Target-Decoy Approach and False Discovery Rate: When Things May Go Wrong
         description:The target-decoy approach (TDA) has done the field of proteomics a great service by filling in the need to estimate the false discovery rates (FDR) of peptide identifications. While TDA is often viewed as a universal solution to the problem of FDR evaluation, we argue that the time has come to critically re-examine TDA and to acknowledge not only its merits but also its demerits. We demonstrate that some popular MS/MS search tools are not TDA-compliant and that it is easy to develop a non-TDA compliant tool that outperforms all TDA-compliant tools. Since the distinction between TDA-compliant and non-TDA compliant tools remains elusive, we are concerned about a possible proliferation of non-TDA-compliant tools in the future (developed with the best intentions). We are also concerned that estimation of the FDR by TDA awkwardly depends on a virtual coin toss and argue that it is important to take the coin toss factor out of our estimation of the FDR. Since computing FDR via TDA suffers from various restrictions, we argue that TDA is not needed when accurate p-values of individual Peptide-Spectrum Matches are available.
         datePublished:2011-05-05T00:00:00Z
         dateModified:2011-05-05T00:00:00Z
         pageStart:1111
         pageEnd:1120
         sameAs:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13361-011-0139-3
         keywords:
            Computational proteomics
            Target-decoy approach
            False discovery rate
            False positive rate
            Database search
            Decoy database
            P-value
            Analytical Chemistry
            Biotechnology
            Organic Chemistry
            Proteomics
            Bioinformatics
         image:
            https://media.springernature.com/lw1200/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13361-011-0139-3/MediaObjects/13361_2011_139_Fig1_HTML.gif
         isPartOf:
            name:Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry
            issn:
               1879-1123
               1044-0305
            volumeNumber:22
            type:
               Periodical
               PublicationVolume
         publisher:
            name:Springer-Verlag
            logo:
               url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
               type:ImageObject
            type:Organization
         author:
               name:Nitin Gupta
               affiliation:
                     name:University of California San Diego
                     address:
                        name:Bioinformatics Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
                        type:PostalAddress
                     type:Organization
               type:Person
               name:Nuno Bandeira
               affiliation:
                     name:University of California San Diego
                     address:
                        name:Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
                        type:PostalAddress
                     type:Organization
                     name:University of California San Diego
                     address:
                        name:Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
                        type:PostalAddress
                     type:Organization
               type:Person
               name:Uri Keich
               affiliation:
                     name:University of Sydney
                     address:
                        name:School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
                        type:PostalAddress
                     type:Organization
               type:Person
               name:Pavel A. Pevzner
               affiliation:
                     name:University of California San Diego
                     address:
                        name:Bioinformatics Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
                        type:PostalAddress
                     type:Organization
                     name:University of California San Diego
                     address:
                        name:Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
                        type:PostalAddress
                     type:Organization
               email:[email protected]
               type:Person
         isAccessibleForFree:1
         type:ScholarlyArticle
      context:https://schema.org
ScholarlyArticle:
      headline:Target-Decoy Approach and False Discovery Rate: When Things May Go Wrong
      description:The target-decoy approach (TDA) has done the field of proteomics a great service by filling in the need to estimate the false discovery rates (FDR) of peptide identifications. While TDA is often viewed as a universal solution to the problem of FDR evaluation, we argue that the time has come to critically re-examine TDA and to acknowledge not only its merits but also its demerits. We demonstrate that some popular MS/MS search tools are not TDA-compliant and that it is easy to develop a non-TDA compliant tool that outperforms all TDA-compliant tools. Since the distinction between TDA-compliant and non-TDA compliant tools remains elusive, we are concerned about a possible proliferation of non-TDA-compliant tools in the future (developed with the best intentions). We are also concerned that estimation of the FDR by TDA awkwardly depends on a virtual coin toss and argue that it is important to take the coin toss factor out of our estimation of the FDR. Since computing FDR via TDA suffers from various restrictions, we argue that TDA is not needed when accurate p-values of individual Peptide-Spectrum Matches are available.
      datePublished:2011-05-05T00:00:00Z
      dateModified:2011-05-05T00:00:00Z
      pageStart:1111
      pageEnd:1120
      sameAs:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13361-011-0139-3
      keywords:
         Computational proteomics
         Target-decoy approach
         False discovery rate
         False positive rate
         Database search
         Decoy database
         P-value
         Analytical Chemistry
         Biotechnology
         Organic Chemistry
         Proteomics
         Bioinformatics
      image:
         https://media.springernature.com/lw1200/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13361-011-0139-3/MediaObjects/13361_2011_139_Fig1_HTML.gif
      isPartOf:
         name:Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry
         issn:
            1879-1123
            1044-0305
         volumeNumber:22
         type:
            Periodical
            PublicationVolume
      publisher:
         name:Springer-Verlag
         logo:
            url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
            type:ImageObject
         type:Organization
      author:
            name:Nitin Gupta
            affiliation:
                  name:University of California San Diego
                  address:
                     name:Bioinformatics Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
                     type:PostalAddress
                  type:Organization
            type:Person
            name:Nuno Bandeira
            affiliation:
                  name:University of California San Diego
                  address:
                     name:Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
                     type:PostalAddress
                  type:Organization
                  name:University of California San Diego
                  address:
                     name:Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
                     type:PostalAddress
                  type:Organization
            type:Person
            name:Uri Keich
            affiliation:
                  name:University of Sydney
                  address:
                     name:School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
                     type:PostalAddress
                  type:Organization
            type:Person
            name:Pavel A. Pevzner
            affiliation:
                  name:University of California San Diego
                  address:
                     name:Bioinformatics Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
                     type:PostalAddress
                  type:Organization
                  name:University of California San Diego
                  address:
                     name:Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
                     type:PostalAddress
                  type:Organization
            email:[email protected]
            type:Person
      isAccessibleForFree:1
["Periodical","PublicationVolume"]:
      name:Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry
      issn:
         1879-1123
         1044-0305
      volumeNumber:22
Organization:
      name:Springer-Verlag
      logo:
         url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
         type:ImageObject
      name:University of California San Diego
      address:
         name:Bioinformatics Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
         type:PostalAddress
      name:University of California San Diego
      address:
         name:Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
         type:PostalAddress
      name:University of California San Diego
      address:
         name:Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
         type:PostalAddress
      name:University of Sydney
      address:
         name:School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
         type:PostalAddress
      name:University of California San Diego
      address:
         name:Bioinformatics Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
         type:PostalAddress
      name:University of California San Diego
      address:
         name:Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
         type:PostalAddress
ImageObject:
      url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
Person:
      name:Nitin Gupta
      affiliation:
            name:University of California San Diego
            address:
               name:Bioinformatics Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
               type:PostalAddress
            type:Organization
      name:Nuno Bandeira
      affiliation:
            name:University of California San Diego
            address:
               name:Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
               type:PostalAddress
            type:Organization
            name:University of California San Diego
            address:
               name:Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
               type:PostalAddress
            type:Organization
      name:Uri Keich
      affiliation:
            name:University of Sydney
            address:
               name:School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
               type:PostalAddress
            type:Organization
      name:Pavel A. Pevzner
      affiliation:
            name:University of California San Diego
            address:
               name:Bioinformatics Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
               type:PostalAddress
            type:Organization
            name:University of California San Diego
            address:
               name:Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
               type:PostalAddress
            type:Organization
      email:[email protected]
PostalAddress:
      name:Bioinformatics Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
      name:Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
      name:Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
      name:School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
      name:Bioinformatics Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
      name:Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA

External Links {πŸ”—}(97)

Analytics and Tracking {πŸ“Š}

  • Google Tag Manager

Libraries {πŸ“š}

  • Clipboard.js
  • Prism.js

CDN Services {πŸ“¦}

  • Crossref

4.35s.