We are analyzing https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/bf01840887.

Title:
Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data | Journal of Molecular Evolution
Description:
The accuracies and efficiencies of four different methods for constructing phylogenetic trees from molecular data were examined by using computer simulation. The methods examined are UPGMA, Fitch and Margoliash
Website Age:
28 years and 1 months (reg. 1997-05-29).

Matching Content Categories {📚}

Science
Education
Technology & Computing

Content Management System {📝}

What CMS is link.springer.com built with?

Custom-built

No common CMS systems were detected on Link.springer.com, and no known web development framework was identified.

Traffic Estimate {📈}

What is the average monthly size of link.springer.com audience?

🌠 Phenomenal Traffic: 5M - 10M visitors per month

Based on our best estimate, this website will receive around 5,000,019 visitors per month in the current month.
However, some sources were not loaded, we suggest to reload the page to get complete results.

check SE Ranking
check Ahrefs
check Similarweb
check Ubersuggest
check Semrush

How Does Link.springer.com Make Money? {💸}

We can't figure out the monetization strategy.

Not all websites are made for profit; some exist to inform or educate users. Or any other reason why people make websites. And this might be the case. Link.springer.com could be secretly minting cash, but we can't detect the process.

Keywords {🔍}

google, scholar, method, evolution, phylogenetic, molecular, farris, data, nei, mol, article, trees, evol, tateno, tree, evolutionary, nucleotide, genetic, methods, sequence, distance, york, privacy, cookies, content, journal, biol, analysis, information, publish, research, search, tajima, simulation, upgma, modified, rate, substitutions, branch, access, genetics, goodman, academic, press, usa, eds, proteins, amino, acid, wilson,

Topics {✒️}

cavalli-sforza ll month download article/chapter modified farris method maximum parsimony method amino-acid sequence investigations tree-making method nucleotide substitution amino acid sequences stochastic farris transform farris method related subjects distance wagner procedure privacy choices/manage cookies nauka publishing office true model tree molecular population genetics observed genetic distances genetic distance check access fitch wm instant access constructing phylogenetic trees full article pdf phylogenetic tree upgma shows molecular data sets european economic area dendrogram problem posed micro-complement fixation evaluating systematic relationships true tree molecular evolution aims nucleotide sequences conditions privacy policy negative binomial distribution immunological cross-reactivity estimated phylogenetic trees mammalian protein metabolism model tree tree obtained molecular evolution considered alternative matrix methods accepting optional cookies sokal rr journal finder publish genetic data main content log simple method statistical method estimating phylogenetic trees

Schema {🗺️}

WebPage:
      mainEntity:
         headline:Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data
         description:The accuracies and efficiencies of four different methods for constructing phylogenetic trees from molecular data were examined by using computer simulation. The methods examined are UPGMA, Fitch and Margoliash's (1967) (F/M) method, Farris' (1972) method, and the modified Farris method (Tateno, Nei, and Tajima, this paper). In the computer simulation, eight OTUs (32 OTUs in one case) were assumed to evolve according to a given model tree, and the evolutionary change of a sequence of 300 nucleotides was followed. The nucleotide substitution in this sequence was assumed to occur following the Poisson distribution, negative binomial distribution or a model of temporally varying rate. Estimates of nucleotide substitutions (genetic distances) were then computed for all pairs of the nucleotide sequences that were generated at the end of the evolution considered, and from these estimates a phylogenetic tree was reconstructed and compared with the true model tree. The results of this comparison indicate that when the coefficient of variation of branch length is large the Farris and modified Farris methods tend to be better than UPGMA and the F/M method for obtaining a good topology. For estimating the number of nucleotide substitutions for each branch of the tree, however, the modified Farris method shows a better performance than the Farris method. When the coefficient of variation of branch length is small, however, UPGMA shows the best performance among the four methods examined. Nevertheless, any tree-making method is likely to make errors in obtaining the correct topology with a high probability, unless all branch lengths of the true tree are sufficiently long. It is also shown that the agreement between patristic and observed genetic distances is not a good indicator of the goodness of the tree obtained.
         datePublished:
         dateModified:
         pageStart:387
         pageEnd:404
         sameAs:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01840887
         keywords:
            Nucleotide substitution
            Genetic distance
            Species tree
            Gene tree
            UPGMA
            Fitch/Margoliash method
            Farris method
            Modified Farris method
            Evolutionary Biology
            Microbiology
            Plant Sciences
            Plant Genetics and Genomics
            Animal Genetics and Genomics
            Cell Biology
         image:
         isPartOf:
            name:Journal of Molecular Evolution
            issn:
               1432-1432
               0022-2844
            volumeNumber:18
            type:
               Periodical
               PublicationVolume
         publisher:
            name:Springer-Verlag
            logo:
               url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
               type:ImageObject
            type:Organization
         author:
               name:Yoshio Tateno
               affiliation:
                     name:University of Texas at Houston
                     address:
                        name:Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, USA
                        type:PostalAddress
                     type:Organization
               type:Person
               name:Masatoshi Nei
               affiliation:
                     name:University of Texas at Houston
                     address:
                        name:Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, USA
                        type:PostalAddress
                     type:Organization
               type:Person
               name:Fumio Tajima
               affiliation:
                     name:University of Texas at Houston
                     address:
                        name:Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, USA
                        type:PostalAddress
                     type:Organization
               type:Person
         isAccessibleForFree:
         hasPart:
            isAccessibleForFree:
            cssSelector:.main-content
            type:WebPageElement
         type:ScholarlyArticle
      context:https://schema.org
ScholarlyArticle:
      headline:Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data
      description:The accuracies and efficiencies of four different methods for constructing phylogenetic trees from molecular data were examined by using computer simulation. The methods examined are UPGMA, Fitch and Margoliash's (1967) (F/M) method, Farris' (1972) method, and the modified Farris method (Tateno, Nei, and Tajima, this paper). In the computer simulation, eight OTUs (32 OTUs in one case) were assumed to evolve according to a given model tree, and the evolutionary change of a sequence of 300 nucleotides was followed. The nucleotide substitution in this sequence was assumed to occur following the Poisson distribution, negative binomial distribution or a model of temporally varying rate. Estimates of nucleotide substitutions (genetic distances) were then computed for all pairs of the nucleotide sequences that were generated at the end of the evolution considered, and from these estimates a phylogenetic tree was reconstructed and compared with the true model tree. The results of this comparison indicate that when the coefficient of variation of branch length is large the Farris and modified Farris methods tend to be better than UPGMA and the F/M method for obtaining a good topology. For estimating the number of nucleotide substitutions for each branch of the tree, however, the modified Farris method shows a better performance than the Farris method. When the coefficient of variation of branch length is small, however, UPGMA shows the best performance among the four methods examined. Nevertheless, any tree-making method is likely to make errors in obtaining the correct topology with a high probability, unless all branch lengths of the true tree are sufficiently long. It is also shown that the agreement between patristic and observed genetic distances is not a good indicator of the goodness of the tree obtained.
      datePublished:
      dateModified:
      pageStart:387
      pageEnd:404
      sameAs:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01840887
      keywords:
         Nucleotide substitution
         Genetic distance
         Species tree
         Gene tree
         UPGMA
         Fitch/Margoliash method
         Farris method
         Modified Farris method
         Evolutionary Biology
         Microbiology
         Plant Sciences
         Plant Genetics and Genomics
         Animal Genetics and Genomics
         Cell Biology
      image:
      isPartOf:
         name:Journal of Molecular Evolution
         issn:
            1432-1432
            0022-2844
         volumeNumber:18
         type:
            Periodical
            PublicationVolume
      publisher:
         name:Springer-Verlag
         logo:
            url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
            type:ImageObject
         type:Organization
      author:
            name:Yoshio Tateno
            affiliation:
                  name:University of Texas at Houston
                  address:
                     name:Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, USA
                     type:PostalAddress
                  type:Organization
            type:Person
            name:Masatoshi Nei
            affiliation:
                  name:University of Texas at Houston
                  address:
                     name:Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, USA
                     type:PostalAddress
                  type:Organization
            type:Person
            name:Fumio Tajima
            affiliation:
                  name:University of Texas at Houston
                  address:
                     name:Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, USA
                     type:PostalAddress
                  type:Organization
            type:Person
      isAccessibleForFree:
      hasPart:
         isAccessibleForFree:
         cssSelector:.main-content
         type:WebPageElement
["Periodical","PublicationVolume"]:
      name:Journal of Molecular Evolution
      issn:
         1432-1432
         0022-2844
      volumeNumber:18
Organization:
      name:Springer-Verlag
      logo:
         url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
         type:ImageObject
      name:University of Texas at Houston
      address:
         name:Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, USA
         type:PostalAddress
      name:University of Texas at Houston
      address:
         name:Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, USA
         type:PostalAddress
      name:University of Texas at Houston
      address:
         name:Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, USA
         type:PostalAddress
ImageObject:
      url:https://www.springernature.com/app-sn/public/images/logo-springernature.png
Person:
      name:Yoshio Tateno
      affiliation:
            name:University of Texas at Houston
            address:
               name:Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, USA
               type:PostalAddress
            type:Organization
      name:Masatoshi Nei
      affiliation:
            name:University of Texas at Houston
            address:
               name:Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, USA
               type:PostalAddress
            type:Organization
      name:Fumio Tajima
      affiliation:
            name:University of Texas at Houston
            address:
               name:Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, USA
               type:PostalAddress
            type:Organization
PostalAddress:
      name:Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, USA
      name:Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, USA
      name:Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, USA
WebPageElement:
      isAccessibleForFree:
      cssSelector:.main-content

External Links {🔗}(68)

Analytics and Tracking {📊}

Google Tag Manager

Libraries {📚}

Clipboard.js
Prism.js

CDN Services {📦}

Crossref

4.52s.

LINK . SPRINGER . COM {}